This Is What Diplomacy Has Come To: Obama and Putin Bump Into Each Other at Lunch

And a few words signal a big news moment.

Russian President Vladimir Putin and President Obama smile for the cameras during an official welcome of G20 leaders in St. Petersburg in September.
National Journal
Marina Koren
June 6, 2014, 7:53 a.m.

To un­der­stand the cur­rent state of af­fairs between Wash­ing­ton and Mo­scow, take a gander at this tweet:

Dip­lo­mat­ic ties between Pres­id­ent Obama and Rus­si­an Pres­id­ent Vladi­mir Putin are so strained, a brief ex­change has be­come break­ing news.

Deputy Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Ad­viser Ben Rhodes said the two pres­id­ents spoke to each oth­er for about 15 minutes dur­ing a lead­ers lunch on Fri­day at the G-7 sum­mit in Brus­sels. Ac­cord­ing to Rhodes, Obama “un­der­scored that the suc­cess­ful Ukra­ni­an elec­tion provides an op­por­tun­ity” for Putin “that should be taken.” If it is taken, Obama told Putin, “there could be open­ings to re­duce ten­sions.”

Now we have proof, from the French pres­id­ency’s Vine ac­count, of all places:

{{third­PartyEmbed type:vine id:MD5Lu5LK­vrT}}

The day be­fore, Obama told re­port­ers that he had no doubt he would see Putin, with whom he has “al­ways had a busi­ness­like re­la­tion­ship,” dur­ing this week’s events. “Keep in mind that al­though we haven’t had form­al meet­ings, I’ve spoken to him by phone re­peatedly from the out­set of the protests,” he said dur­ing a press con­fer­ence. “And my mes­sage has been very con­sist­ent — and that is that Rus­sia has a le­git­im­ate in­terest in what hap­pens in Ukraine, giv­en that it’s on its bor­der and giv­en its his­tor­ic­al ties. But ul­ti­mately, it is up to the people of Ukraine to make their own de­cisions.”

Obama said that if Rus­sia de­cides not to pur­sue dip­lo­mat­ic en­gage­ment with Petro Poroshen­ko, Ukraine’s newly elec­ted pres­id­ent, then the U.S. has “no choice but to re­spond.”

“But I think we have to see what he does and not what he says,” the pres­id­ent ad­ded. Un­til then, much of the back-and-forth between the na­tions will re­main “on the mar­gins” — and break­ing news.

Face-to-face in­ter­ac­tions between the two world lead­ers have al­ways been closely watched, however. Re­call how the hand­shake the pair shared last Septem­ber, when they met dur­ing the G-20 sum­mit in St. Peters­burg, was dis­sec­ted for hints of mean­ing (and clues of awk­ward­ness).

This post has been up­dated with more de­tails of the meet­ing.

What We're Following See More »
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
19 hours ago

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
20 hours ago

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.