Obama on Bergdahl Swap: I Make No Apologies

“We do not leave anybody wearing the American uniform behind,” the president said at a press conference Thursday morning.

National Journal
Marina Koren
June 5, 2014, 6:34 a.m.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 5008) }}

An Amer­ic­an sol­dier’s re­lease from Taliban cap­tiv­ity first drew cel­eb­ra­tion, then cri­ti­cism, and now, a lot of con­fu­sion.

The White House, however, knows where it stands.

“We do not leave any­body wear­ing the Amer­ic­an uni­form be­hind. We had a pris­on­er of war whose health had de­teri­or­ated, and we were deeply con­cerned about, and we saw an op­por­tun­ity, and we seized it,” Pres­id­ent Obama said Thursday dur­ing a press con­fer­ence from the G-7 sum­mit in Brus­sels. “And I make no apo­lo­gies for that.”

The pub­lic is still learn­ing the de­tails of the Guantanamo Bay pris­on­er swap that brought Army Sgt. Bowe Ber­g­dahl in­to U.S. mil­it­ary hands after five years in Afgh­anistan. And no one — not even those who knew him — seems able to de­cide wheth­er Ber­g­dahl’s al­leged ac­tions be­fore he was kid­napped mat­ter in the con­text of his re­turn.

“I be­lieve that he totally deser­ted — not only his fel­low sol­diers — but his lead­er­ship that wanted the best for him and for our coun­try,” Justin Ger­leve, Ber­g­dahl’s former squad lead­er, told CNN on Wed­nes­day. But Ger­leve be­lieves the sol­dier should have been res­cued. “My opin­ion is yes; no Amer­ic­an needs to be left be­hind.”

In Wash­ing­ton, out­rage is brew­ing as Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­an law­makers won­der why Con­gress was not con­sul­ted 30 days in ad­vance about the de­cision to free Ber­g­dahl in ex­change for five Taliban op­er­at­ives.

“We had dis­cussed with Con­gress the pos­sib­il­ity that something like this might oc­cur, but be­cause of the nature of the folks that we were deal­ing with and the fra­gile nature of these ne­go­ti­ations, we felt it was im­port­ant to go ahead and do what we did,” Obama said Thursday. “And we’re now ex­plain­ing to Con­gress the de­tails of how we moved for­ward.”

Con­gress looks pre­pared to hear them, but some are more in­ter­ested in the pres­id­ent’s role in the situ­ation. “There’s too much em­phas­is on Ber­g­dahl. That is not that im­port­ant,” Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee rank­ing mem­ber James In­hofe said Wed­nes­day after a clas­si­fied White House brief­ing on the swap. “What is im­port­ant is what the pres­id­ent did.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 5004) }}

What We're Following See More »
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.