The Surveillance State Is Well Protected and Winning

The president is on the right track but still needs to bring the NSA to heel.

President Barack Obama looks through binoculars towards North Korea from Observation Post Ouellette during a visit to the Joint Security Area of the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) near Panmunjom on the border between North and South Korea on March 25, 2012.
National Journal
Ron Fournier
March 25, 2014, 6:05 a.m.

Bul­lied in­to ac­tion by Ed­ward Snowden — no hero or trait­or, he — Pres­id­ent Obama might fi­nally get one thing right about the Sur­veil­lance State. To bor­row a fa­vor­ite phrase, he might be on the right side of his­tory.

The New York Times re­por­ted today that the White House will ask Con­gress to end the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s open-ended col­lec­tion of data about Amer­ic­ans’ call­ing habits. Un­der the pro­pos­al, the bulk re­cords would stay in the hands of phone com­pan­ies, which would not be re­quired to re­tain the data for any longer than they nor­mally would. The NSA could seize spe­cif­ic re­cords only with a judge’s per­mis­sion.

It’s an im­port­ant step, but Obama still must show he can be trans­par­ent, trus­ted, and ef­fect­ive. Will he be bet­ter about re­veal­ing and ex­plain­ing the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s na­tion­al se­cur­ity meth­ods?

Will his ad­min­is­tra­tion stop pars­ing, de­ceiv­ing, and ly­ing un­ne­ces­sar­ily about in­tel­li­gence pro­grams? Will the worst of­fend­ers (read: James Clap­per) be held ac­count­able?

Will his bill be­come law? It could track the Obama-era pat­tern: a pub­lic-re­la­tions salve fol­lowed by le­gis­lat­ive fail­ure.

Let’s hope Obama suc­ceeds. The na­tion­al se­cur­ity com­munity must be both well armed and fully sup­por­ted by the Amer­ic­an pub­lic to counter ex­ist­en­tial threats in a post-9/11 world. For in­stance, the abil­ity to trace and ana­lyze the phone re­cords of sus­pec­ted ter­ror­ists and their as­so­ci­ates could save lives — and in cer­tain cir­cum­stances, with prop­er checks and bal­ances, the pro­cess might in­clude the re­cords of Amer­ic­ans.

The Obama plan, as de­scribed by Charlie Sav­age of The Times, ad­justs the bal­ance between se­cur­ity and liberty:

The new type of sur­veil­lance court or­ders en­vi­sioned by the ad­min­is­tra­tion would re­quire phone com­pan­ies to swiftly provide re­cords in a tech­no­lo­gic­ally com­pat­ible data format, in­clud­ing mak­ing avail­able, on a con­tinu­ing basis, data about any new calls placed or re­ceived after the or­der is re­ceived, the of­fi­cials said.

They would also al­low the gov­ern­ment to swiftly seek re­lated re­cords for callers up to two phone calls, or “hops,” re­moved from the num­ber that has come un­der sus­pi­cion, even if those callers are cus­tom­ers of oth­er com­pan­ies.

The N.S.A. now re­tains the phone data for five years. But the ad­min­is­tra­tion con­sidered and re­jec­ted im­pos­ing a man­date on phone com­pan­ies that they hold on to their cus­tom­ers’ call­ing re­cords for a peri­od longer than the 18 months that fed­er­al reg­u­la­tions already gen­er­ally re­quire — a bur­den that the com­pan­ies had res­isted shoul­der­ing and that was seen as a ma­jor obstacle to keep­ing the data in their hands. A seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cial said that in­tel­li­gence agen­cies had con­cluded that the op­er­a­tion­al im­pact of that change would be small be­cause older data is less im­port­ant.

The in­tel­li­gence com­munity ar­gues that the cur­rent pro­gram does not con­sti­tute spy­ing on Amer­ic­ans, be­cause ac­tu­al tele­phone calls are not mon­itored. First, do you be­lieve them? Second, in a mega-data world, the bulk col­lec­tion and ana­lys­is of tele­phone re­cords yield to the gov­ern­ment vast amounts of per­son­al in­form­a­tion. It’s spy­ing. It needs to be done spar­ingly and un­der the type of check-and-bal­ance ap­proach sug­ges­ted in the new Obama plan.

Obama’s bill will com­pete with oth­ers on Cap­it­ol Hill that would au­thor­ize the cur­rent pro­gram with only minor changes. Minor fixes aren’t enough. To pro­tect the Con­sti­tu­tion and his leg­acy, Obama must do more than pro­pose a full over­haul. He must win it.

Pri­vacy ad­voc­ates and lib­er­als might call Obama’s ca­pit­u­la­tion a vic­tory for Snowden. I wouldn’t. I’m still where I was nine months ago, when I dis­missed the hero-or-trait­or de­bate and said the fo­cus should be on sur­veil­lance pro­grams launched by Pres­id­ent Bush after 9/11 and ex­pan­ded un­der Obama.

Love him or hate him, we all owe Snowden our thanks for for­cing upon the na­tion an im­port­ant de­bate. But the de­bate shouldn’t be about him. It should be about the gnaw­ing ques­tions his ac­tions raised from the shad­ows.

In the end, fear and polit­ics likely will pre­vail, as it has in Amer­ica’s past. Wash­ing­ton elites will close ranks to pro­tect the Sur­veil­lance State, to trample out trans­par­ency and to mis­lead the pub­lic. Maybe we can talk first?

So now we’ve talked, and now Obama has a bill, and not much else has been done. The Sur­veil­lance State is well pro­tec­ted and win­ning.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×