The ghost of mom jeans past has come back to haunt the president.
President Obama called into On Air With Ryan Seacrest on Friday to discuss his recent trip to a Gap store in New York. Seacrest jokingly asked the president if a Gap sales associate had suggested that the leader “update his jeans.”
“I’ve been fairly maligned about my jeans,” Obama told the host. “The truth is, generally, I look very sharp in jeans.”
The president then reminded listeners of the jeans that started it all. It was July 2009. Obama threw out the first pitch for the Major League Baseball All-Star game in St. Louis, wearing a 1990s-style of pant humorously parodied by a 2003 Saturday Night Live skit for a fake brand called Mom Jeans.
“Fashionistas accuse President Obama of wearing ‘mom jeans,’” a CNN story declared back then. The Huffington Post even polled its readers about the commander in chief’s casual look. “You are married to one of the most fashionable women in the world — do you want to defend the pants?” Meredith Vieira asked Obama on The Today Show a week later. “I’m a little frumpy,” the president responded.
The wardrobe choice earned Obama the nickname of President Mom Jeans, and critics have pointed to the jeans as a sign of weakness. The latest jab came last week from former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin, in response to a White House photograph of a jeans-clad Obama in the Oval Office, talking to Russian President Vladimir Putin on the phone.
“People are looking at Putin as one who wrestles bears and drills for oil,” Palin told Fox News’ Sean Hannity. “They look at our president as one who wears mom jeans and equivocates and bloviates.”
The joke has clearly stuck, and it has popped up any time a casually dressed Obama goes on a bike ride or visits a museum.
Sure, mom jeans don’t look good on just about everyone — the irrational above-the-navel waist, those big pockets that make behinds look disproportionately long, that glaring light-blue wash. In other words, solid joke material. Now forget about the president, and think about who actually wears mom jeans on a regular basis. When you do that, the implied insult of mom-jean jokes transcends the seams and hits at the people who actually wear them: moms.
So when, as Susan Orlean observed in The New Yorker in 2011, did “mom” become a swear word? And when did looking like one become almost offensive? Orlean went on:
I guess the current definition of “mom” is someone who wears their jeans high enough to hide their tramp stamp; is attractive but genderless; is, in other words, nice, slightly frumpy, has old cookie batter dried in her badly-in-need-of-an-updated-haircut hair, exudes not one jot of danger or adventure or abandon although somewhere, under her really-should-give-it-to-Goodwill-it-is-so-old-and-unstylish flowered top, you can detect a whiff of a once-exciting woman. In other words, please kill me now.
Moms, by virtue of pushing children out into the world and then raising them, are not weak. They often juggle work, hobbies, and their children’s hobbies. They are tough decision makers who don’t have time for nonsense or procrastination. Some serve in Congress, others medal at the Olympics. “Women who buy [mom jeans] are practical and likely too busy to care that fashion editors and designers have declared that skinny jeans are a ‘must’ for the fall season,” Jill Hudson Neal wrote in The Washington Post in 2006. In other words, mom-jeans wearers are the kinds of people who get stuff done.
Many moms are also, perhaps most importantly in this case, voters. Palin’s suggestion that people who wear mom jeans are weak isn’t likely to resonate with the female, child-bearing base.
If your eyes have welled up at all those P&G mom ads for the Olympics — and admit it, they have — then you know that moms are objectively some of the best — and strongest — people in the world.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."