Who Said It, Obama or Nixon?

The answer will be both when Obama delivers a State of the Union speech that uses language of past presidents.

National Journal
George E. Condon Jr.
Jan. 26, 2014, 10:05 a.m.

When Pres­id­ent Obama be­gins his State of the Uni­on ad­dress Tues­day night, listen closely and you’ll hear echoes of Richard Nix­on, Jimmy Carter, and many of the pres­id­ents who pre­ceded him to the po­di­um. Listen par­tic­u­larly hard when he says the word “new.” For when it comes to this an­nu­al ad­dress there is no word more favored by this pres­id­ent — and all his pre­de­cessors — than “new.”

In his pre­vi­ous four State of the Uni­on speeches, it popped up 132 times, top­ping out at 42 in­stances in 2011 and 34 last year. And that doesn’t even rank Obama at the top of the pres­id­en­tial heap over the last six dec­ades. Pres­id­ent Clin­ton was the cham­pi­on of “new” with 275 us­ages, in­clud­ing 53 in his 1998 ad­dress. Dwight Eis­en­hower was next with 171 cita­tions, then Obama, fol­lowed by Nix­on with 119 and George W. Bush with 101. At the bot­tom is Carter with only 36 “news” in his three speeches. Sur­pris­ingly, it was a two-term pres­id­ent, Ron­ald Re­agan, who shunned al­most all things “new” in his speeches. Re­agan said the word only 42 times in sev­en ad­dresses.

Ex­cept for Re­agan, all of the last 11 pres­id­ents have tried to use their an­nu­al trip to Cap­it­ol Hill to ap­pear act­iv­ist, en­gaged, and for­ward-look­ing — all things that speech­writers try to cap­ture with the word “new.” Com­bine that with pres­id­en­tial envy of Woo­drow Wilson’s New Free­dom, Frank­lin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal, and John F. Kennedy’s New Fron­ti­er, and you’ve got dozens of failed at­tempts to sell fresh and snappy terms.

But, as Obama has learned, “new” doesn’t al­ways mean new. Pres­id­ents — some­times without even real­iz­ing it — bor­row phrases and ideas from their pre­de­cessors. Ex­pect to hear this pres­id­ent use his speech this year to push Con­gress to make 2014 “a year of ac­tion.” It’s a phrase he pre­viewed earli­er this month. But there is noth­ing new here. It is bor­rowed. Cred­it Nix­on for this one. In his State of the Uni­on in 1972, he com­plained that Con­gress had ig­nored his le­gis­lat­ive agenda over the past 12 months. That, he said, had been “a year of con­sid­er­a­tion.” But, he ad­ded, “Now, let us join in mak­ing 1972 a year of ac­tion on them, ac­tion by the Con­gress, for the na­tion, and for the people of Amer­ica.”

Pres­id­ents are “al­ways look­ing for a simple, easy-to-re­mem­ber mes­sage on top of all their policy pro­pos­als,” said Wil­li­am Gal­ston, Clin­ton’s chief do­mest­ic policy ad­viser. “Something that not only gives some rhet­or­ic­al lift but gives the people listen­ing to the speech the im­pres­sion that it all ties to­geth­er, that all these spe­cif­ic ideas are in pur­suit of a com­mon goal or a com­mon vis­ion.” Gal­ston ad­ded, “Un­der­ly­ing that is the mes­sage of lead­er­ship — ‘Hey, I know what I am do­ing. I am here for a pur­pose. I’m a clear-eyed, goal-ori­ented, mis­sion-ori­ented lead­er.’ And a good slo­gan can con­vey all of that.”

That has giv­en us Clin­ton’s New Cov­en­ant, Nix­on’s New Fed­er­al­ism, and Carter’s New Found­a­tion, all terms un­veiled in a State of the Uni­on ad­dress. Carter’s was per­haps the most un­for­tu­nate in 1979. He used the term five times and the word “found­a­tion” 13 times. But only three days later — after much mock­ing that a “new found­a­tion” had something to do with wo­men’s un­der­gar­ments — Carter cast the cam­paign aside, telling re­port­ers, “I doubt it will sur­vive. We are not try­ing to es­tab­lish this as a per­man­ent slo­gan. It was the theme that was es­tab­lished … for one State of the Uni­on speech.” For­get that the White House had, in­deed, been selling it as a per­man­ent slo­gan.

Just as ad­vert­isers now use the Su­per Bowl to un­veil new products, pres­id­ents use the State of the Uni­on to pitch new slo­gans. Some that have failed al­most as miser­ably as New Found­a­tion in re­cent dec­ades have been New Part­ner­ship (offered by at least four pres­id­ents), New Fed­er­al­ism, New Be­gin­nings, New Road, New Ap­proach (paired by three pres­id­ents with policy to­ward Lat­in Amer­ica), New Dir­ec­tion, New Amer­ic­an Re­volu­tion, New Bal­ance, New Spir­it, New Spir­it of Part­ner­ship, New Chal­lenge, and New Cov­en­ant.

There has been so much re­pe­ti­tion that even Carter’s un­la­men­ted New Found­a­tion was re­cycled by none oth­er than the cur­rent pres­id­ent. In his first in­aug­ur­al ad­dress, Obama de­clared, “The state of our eco­nomy calls for ac­tion: bold and swift. And we will act not only to cre­ate new jobs but to lay a New Found­a­tion for growth.” Obama then de­voted a later speech to the concept of a New Found­a­tion and used the phrase dozens of times un­til the White House be­came con­vinced nobody knew what it meant and switched to “Win the Fu­ture.”

He is hop­ing for bet­ter luck with his bor­rowed “Year of Ac­tion.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4679) }}

What We're Following See More »
LEGACY PLAY
Sanders and Clinton Spar Over … President Obama
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama became a surprise topic of contention toward the end of the Democratic debate, as Hillary Clinton reminded viewers that Sanders had challenged the progressive bona fides of President Obama in 2011 and suggested that someone might challenge him from the left. “The kind of criticism that we’ve heard from Senator Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama,” she said. “Madame Secretary, that is a low blow,” replied Sanders, before getting in another dig during his closing statement: “One of us ran against Barack Obama. I was not that candidate.”

THE 1%
Sanders’s Appeals to Minorities Still Filtered Through Wall Street Talk
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”

DIRECT APPEAL TO MINORITIES, WOMEN
Clinton Already Pivoting Her Messaging
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.

THE QUESTION
How Many Jobs Would Be Lost Under Bernie Sanders’s Single-Payer System?
13 hours ago
THE ANSWER

More than 11 million, according to Manhattan Institute fellow Yevgeniy Feyman, writing in RealClearPolicy.

Source:
WEEKEND DATA DUMP
State to Release 550 More Clinton Emails on Saturday
13 hours ago
THE LATEST

Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.

Source:
×