NSA Report: Keep the Crown Jewels

President’s commission is only a narrow victory for surveillance opponents

A sign stands outside the National Security Administration (NSA) campus in Fort Meade, Md., Thursday, June 6, 2013.
National Journal
Michael Hirsh
See more stories about...
Michael Hirsh
Dec. 18, 2013, 12:21 p.m.

Don’t give up the crown jew­els of Amer­ica’s sur­veil­lance pro­gram, in­clud­ing bulk col­lec­tion of tele­phone data, but add enough new trans­par­ency and leg­al re­stric­tions to ful­fill the pub­lic’s right to pri­vacy and civil liber­ties. That’s the bot­tom line of a 304-page re­port re­leased late Wed­nes­day by Pres­id­ent Obama’s spe­cial re­view com­mis­sion on the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s con­tro­ver­sial spy­ing pro­grams.

The re­port, titled “Liberty and Se­cur­ity in A Chan­ging World,” sup­plies a nar­row vic­tory to NSA leak­er Ed­ward Snowden and his sup­port­ers, but not much more than that, in that its re­com­mend­a­tions would leave the NSA’s mass sur­veil­lance pro­grams largely in­tact.

Among the im­port­ant changes re­com­men­ded were that the con­tro­ver­sial col­lec­tion of mass amounts of data be con­duc­ted by the private sec­tor rather than the gov­ern­ment; that new rules re­strict the abil­ity of the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court (FISC) to com­pel tele­phone ser­vice pro­viders and oth­er third parties to dis­close private in­form­a­tion to the gov­ern­ment, and the abil­ity of the FBI to is­sue “Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Let­ters” com­pel­ling  in­di­vidu­als and or­gan­iz­a­tions to turn over private re­cords; and that a  pub­lic in­terest ad­voc­ate be cre­ated to ap­pear be­fore the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court.

White House spokes­man Jay Car­ney said the ad­min­is­tra­tion would likely ad­opt some re­com­mend­a­tions and re­ject oth­ers. The ad­min­is­tra­tion has already re­jec­ted the pan­el’s pro­pos­al to sep­ar­ate con­trol of the NSA and Cy­ber Com­mand, but it is likely to agree to its re­com­mend­a­tion to try to come to new agree­ments with for­eign lead­ers on lim­it­ing sur­veil­lance.

On the col­lec­tion of so-called “metadata,” the cur­rent sys­tem  “cre­ates po­ten­tial risks to pub­lic trust, per­son­al pri­vacy, and civil liberty,” the re­port says, adding that it en­dorsed “a broad prin­ciple for the fu­ture: as a gen­er­al rule and without seni­or policy re­view, the gov­ern­ment should not be per­mit­ted to col­lect and store mass, un­di­ges­ted, non-pub­lic per­son­al in­form­a­tion about US per­sons for the pur­pose of en­abling fu­ture quer­ies and data-min­ing for for­eign in­tel­li­gence pur­poses.”

Non­ethe­less, the pan­el em­braced the need to con­tin­ue the NSA pro­grams that use such data for sur­veil­lance, in par­tic­u­lar Sec­tion 215 of the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Act, which au­thor­izes searches of tele­phon­ic “metadata.” And by sug­gest­ing that re­quests for such data col­lec­tion meet only a rather vague stand­ard — “to serve an im­port­ant gov­ern­ment in­terest,” as the re­port says at one point — the pan­el ap­peared to leave the re­com­men­ded leg­al threshold for searches low enough that the NSA would likely be able to con­tin­ue most of what it cur­rently does, even if the agency would have to ask a judge’s per­mis­sion more of­ten.  The re­port also af­firmed the need for Sec­tion 702, which au­thor­izes the search of emails abroad.

The re­port was  pro­duced by a re­l­at­ively in­tel­li­gence-friendly group of former of­fi­cials and leg­al ex­perts con­sist­ing of ex-coun­terter­ror­ism co­ordin­at­or Richard A. Clarke;  Mi­chael  Mo­rell, the former deputy dir­ect­or of the CIA; Geof­frey Stone, a Uni­versity of Chica­go law pro­fess­or; Peter Swire, an ex­pert in pri­vacy law at the Geor­gia In­sti­tute of Tech­no­logy, and Obama’s former reg­u­la­tion czar, Cass Sun­stein.  

Sup­port­ers of the NSA pro­gram say that Sec­tion 215,  which al­lows for va­cu­um­ing of tele­phon­ic data, is needed as a dis­cov­ery tool in or­der to de­tect new ter­ror­ist plots at a time when the threat is far more dif­fuse and harder to un­cov­er.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4631) }}

What We're Following See More »
Trump to Meet with Ryan, Leadership Next Week
6 minutes ago

A day after saying he could not yet support Donald Trump's presidential bid, House Speaker Paul Ryan has invited the billionaire to a meeting in Washington next week with House leadership. Ryan and Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus will also meet separately with Trump. 

Obama on Trump: ‘This Is a Really Serious Job’
24 minutes ago

"President Obama used the White House podium on Friday to dismiss Donald Trump as an unserious candidate to succeed him, and said leading the country isn't a job that's suited to reality show antics." At a briefing with reporters, the president said, "I just want to emphasize the degree to which we are in serious times and this is a really serious job. This is not entertainment. This is not a reality show. This is a contest for the presidency of the United States. And what that means is that every candidate, every nominee needs to be subject to exacting standards and genuine scrutiny."

Panama Papers Spur White House to Crack Down on Evasion
2 hours ago

In the The White House on Thursday night unveiled a series of executive actions to combat money laundering—"among the most comprehensive response yet to the Panama Papers revelations." The president's orders will tighten transparency rules, close loopholes that allow "foreigners to hide financial activity behind anonymous entities in the U.S., and demand stricter “customer due diligence” rules for banks.

Who’s #NeverTrump Courting as Possible Candidates
2 hours ago

The #NeverTrump movement is now mulling the idea of recruiting a candidate to run as an independent or under a third-party banner. But who might it be? The Hill offers a preliminary list.

  • Sen. Ben Sasse (R-NE)
  • Mitt Romney
  • 2012 (and perhaps 2016) Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson
  • Former Marine Gen. John Kelly
  • Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI)
  • Former Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK)
  • South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley
  • Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY)
362,000 JOBS ADDED
‘Mildly Disappointing’ Jobs Report
3 hours ago

The U.S. economy added 160,000 jobs in April, a "mildly disappointing" result relative to the 200,000 expected, according to the New York Times' Neil Irwin. On the plus side, hourly earnings were up 2.5% from a year ago. But on the other hand, "the labor force shrank by 362,000 people and the labor force participation rate fell by 0.2 percentage points."