NSA Report: Keep the Crown Jewels

President’s commission is only a narrow victory for surveillance opponents

A sign stands outside the National Security Administration (NSA) campus in Fort Meade, Md., Thursday, June 6, 2013.
National Journal
Michael Hirsh
See more stories about...
Michael Hirsh
Dec. 18, 2013, 12:21 p.m.

Don’t give up the crown jew­els of Amer­ica’s sur­veil­lance pro­gram, in­clud­ing bulk col­lec­tion of tele­phone data, but add enough new trans­par­ency and leg­al re­stric­tions to ful­fill the pub­lic’s right to pri­vacy and civil liber­ties. That’s the bot­tom line of a 304-page re­port re­leased late Wed­nes­day by Pres­id­ent Obama’s spe­cial re­view com­mis­sion on the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s con­tro­ver­sial spy­ing pro­grams.

The re­port, titled “Liberty and Se­cur­ity in A Chan­ging World,” sup­plies a nar­row vic­tory to NSA leak­er Ed­ward Snowden and his sup­port­ers, but not much more than that, in that its re­com­mend­a­tions would leave the NSA’s mass sur­veil­lance pro­grams largely in­tact.

Among the im­port­ant changes re­com­men­ded were that the con­tro­ver­sial col­lec­tion of mass amounts of data be con­duc­ted by the private sec­tor rather than the gov­ern­ment; that new rules re­strict the abil­ity of the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court (FISC) to com­pel tele­phone ser­vice pro­viders and oth­er third parties to dis­close private in­form­a­tion to the gov­ern­ment, and the abil­ity of the FBI to is­sue “Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Let­ters” com­pel­ling  in­di­vidu­als and or­gan­iz­a­tions to turn over private re­cords; and that a  pub­lic in­terest ad­voc­ate be cre­ated to ap­pear be­fore the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court.

White House spokes­man Jay Car­ney said the ad­min­is­tra­tion would likely ad­opt some re­com­mend­a­tions and re­ject oth­ers. The ad­min­is­tra­tion has already re­jec­ted the pan­el’s pro­pos­al to sep­ar­ate con­trol of the NSA and Cy­ber Com­mand, but it is likely to agree to its re­com­mend­a­tion to try to come to new agree­ments with for­eign lead­ers on lim­it­ing sur­veil­lance.

On the col­lec­tion of so-called “metadata,” the cur­rent sys­tem  “cre­ates po­ten­tial risks to pub­lic trust, per­son­al pri­vacy, and civil liberty,” the re­port says, adding that it en­dorsed “a broad prin­ciple for the fu­ture: as a gen­er­al rule and without seni­or policy re­view, the gov­ern­ment should not be per­mit­ted to col­lect and store mass, un­di­ges­ted, non-pub­lic per­son­al in­form­a­tion about US per­sons for the pur­pose of en­abling fu­ture quer­ies and data-min­ing for for­eign in­tel­li­gence pur­poses.”

Non­ethe­less, the pan­el em­braced the need to con­tin­ue the NSA pro­grams that use such data for sur­veil­lance, in par­tic­u­lar Sec­tion 215 of the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Act, which au­thor­izes searches of tele­phon­ic “metadata.” And by sug­gest­ing that re­quests for such data col­lec­tion meet only a rather vague stand­ard — “to serve an im­port­ant gov­ern­ment in­terest,” as the re­port says at one point — the pan­el ap­peared to leave the re­com­men­ded leg­al threshold for searches low enough that the NSA would likely be able to con­tin­ue most of what it cur­rently does, even if the agency would have to ask a judge’s per­mis­sion more of­ten.  The re­port also af­firmed the need for Sec­tion 702, which au­thor­izes the search of emails abroad.

The re­port was  pro­duced by a re­l­at­ively in­tel­li­gence-friendly group of former of­fi­cials and leg­al ex­perts con­sist­ing of ex-coun­terter­ror­ism co­ordin­at­or Richard A. Clarke;  Mi­chael  Mo­rell, the former deputy dir­ect­or of the CIA; Geof­frey Stone, a Uni­versity of Chica­go law pro­fess­or; Peter Swire, an ex­pert in pri­vacy law at the Geor­gia In­sti­tute of Tech­no­logy, and Obama’s former reg­u­la­tion czar, Cass Sun­stein.  

Sup­port­ers of the NSA pro­gram say that Sec­tion 215,  which al­lows for va­cu­um­ing of tele­phon­ic data, is needed as a dis­cov­ery tool in or­der to de­tect new ter­ror­ist plots at a time when the threat is far more dif­fuse and harder to un­cov­er.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4631) }}

What We're Following See More »
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
2 days ago

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
3 days ago

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
3 days ago

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
3 days ago
California: It’s Not Over Yet
3 days ago

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.