NSA Report: Keep the Crown Jewels

President’s commission is only a narrow victory for surveillance opponents

A sign stands outside the National Security Administration (NSA) campus in Fort Meade, Md., Thursday, June 6, 2013.
National Journal
Michael Hirsh
See more stories about...
Michael Hirsh
Dec. 18, 2013, 12:21 p.m.

Don’t give up the crown jew­els of Amer­ica’s sur­veil­lance pro­gram, in­clud­ing bulk col­lec­tion of tele­phone data, but add enough new trans­par­ency and leg­al re­stric­tions to ful­fill the pub­lic’s right to pri­vacy and civil liber­ties. That’s the bot­tom line of a 304-page re­port re­leased late Wed­nes­day by Pres­id­ent Obama’s spe­cial re­view com­mis­sion on the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s con­tro­ver­sial spy­ing pro­grams.

The re­port, titled “Liberty and Se­cur­ity in A Chan­ging World,” sup­plies a nar­row vic­tory to NSA leak­er Ed­ward Snowden and his sup­port­ers, but not much more than that, in that its re­com­mend­a­tions would leave the NSA’s mass sur­veil­lance pro­grams largely in­tact.

Among the im­port­ant changes re­com­men­ded were that the con­tro­ver­sial col­lec­tion of mass amounts of data be con­duc­ted by the private sec­tor rather than the gov­ern­ment; that new rules re­strict the abil­ity of the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court (FISC) to com­pel tele­phone ser­vice pro­viders and oth­er third parties to dis­close private in­form­a­tion to the gov­ern­ment, and the abil­ity of the FBI to is­sue “Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Let­ters” com­pel­ling  in­di­vidu­als and or­gan­iz­a­tions to turn over private re­cords; and that a  pub­lic in­terest ad­voc­ate be cre­ated to ap­pear be­fore the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court.

White House spokes­man Jay Car­ney said the ad­min­is­tra­tion would likely ad­opt some re­com­mend­a­tions and re­ject oth­ers. The ad­min­is­tra­tion has already re­jec­ted the pan­el’s pro­pos­al to sep­ar­ate con­trol of the NSA and Cy­ber Com­mand, but it is likely to agree to its re­com­mend­a­tion to try to come to new agree­ments with for­eign lead­ers on lim­it­ing sur­veil­lance.

On the col­lec­tion of so-called “metadata,” the cur­rent sys­tem  “cre­ates po­ten­tial risks to pub­lic trust, per­son­al pri­vacy, and civil liberty,” the re­port says, adding that it en­dorsed “a broad prin­ciple for the fu­ture: as a gen­er­al rule and without seni­or policy re­view, the gov­ern­ment should not be per­mit­ted to col­lect and store mass, un­di­ges­ted, non-pub­lic per­son­al in­form­a­tion about US per­sons for the pur­pose of en­abling fu­ture quer­ies and data-min­ing for for­eign in­tel­li­gence pur­poses.”

Non­ethe­less, the pan­el em­braced the need to con­tin­ue the NSA pro­grams that use such data for sur­veil­lance, in par­tic­u­lar Sec­tion 215 of the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Act, which au­thor­izes searches of tele­phon­ic “metadata.” And by sug­gest­ing that re­quests for such data col­lec­tion meet only a rather vague stand­ard — “to serve an im­port­ant gov­ern­ment in­terest,” as the re­port says at one point — the pan­el ap­peared to leave the re­com­men­ded leg­al threshold for searches low enough that the NSA would likely be able to con­tin­ue most of what it cur­rently does, even if the agency would have to ask a judge’s per­mis­sion more of­ten.  The re­port also af­firmed the need for Sec­tion 702, which au­thor­izes the search of emails abroad.

The re­port was  pro­duced by a re­l­at­ively in­tel­li­gence-friendly group of former of­fi­cials and leg­al ex­perts con­sist­ing of ex-coun­terter­ror­ism co­ordin­at­or Richard A. Clarke;  Mi­chael  Mo­rell, the former deputy dir­ect­or of the CIA; Geof­frey Stone, a Uni­versity of Chica­go law pro­fess­or; Peter Swire, an ex­pert in pri­vacy law at the Geor­gia In­sti­tute of Tech­no­logy, and Obama’s former reg­u­la­tion czar, Cass Sun­stein.  

Sup­port­ers of the NSA pro­gram say that Sec­tion 215,  which al­lows for va­cu­um­ing of tele­phon­ic data, is needed as a dis­cov­ery tool in or­der to de­tect new ter­ror­ist plots at a time when the threat is far more dif­fuse and harder to un­cov­er.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4631) }}

What We're Following See More »
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
1 days ago

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
1 days ago

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
1 days ago

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
12 hours ago

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.