How Mega-Mergers Give the FCC Stealth Power for Net Neutrality

The agency can leverage approval of the massive marriages to achieve a range of policy goals.

National Journal
Brendan Sasso
May 29, 2014, 6:32 a.m.

En­act­ing new fed­er­al reg­u­la­tions can be hard work.

First, the agency has to make a form­al pro­pos­al. Then, after months of sift­ing through com­ments, the agency has to act again to im­pose the fi­nal rules. And it’s al­most a guar­an­tee that some­body will sue, res­ult­ing in more months of lit­ig­a­tion and the pos­sib­il­ity that the courts will force the agency back to square one.

But the Fed­er­al Com­mu­nic­a­tions Com­mis­sion now has a golden op­por­tun­ity to achieve some key policy goals without all the messi­ness of form­al reg­u­lat­ing — in­clud­ing on the con­tro­ver­sial is­sue of net neut­ral­ity.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4950) }}

The agency is set to re­view two ma­jor mer­gers, with a pos­sible third around the corner. The FCC can give the com­pan­ies the go-ahead or block the deals. But the com­mis­sion also has a third op­tion: It can ap­prove the mer­gers provided that the com­pan­ies com­ply with cer­tain con­di­tions — and therein lies the agency’s stealth power.

Be­cause these mer­gers are so massive, any con­di­tions the FCC im­poses could re­shape the in­dus­tries it reg­u­lates. And com­pan­ies aren’t likely to fight or sue over ob­lig­a­tions they have to ac­cept to get a mult­i­bil­lion-dol­lar deal ap­proved.

The first mer­ger be­fore the FCC is Com­cast’s $45 bil­lion bid to takeover Time Warner Cable. The com­bined con­glom­er­ate would con­trol just un­der 30 per­cent of the pay-TV mar­ket and a sim­il­ar share of the na­tion’s broad­band In­ter­net sub­scribers.

AT&T is seek­ing ap­prov­al to buy Dir­ecTV for $48.5 bil­lion, and Sprint has made no secret of the fact that it would like to ac­quire T-Mo­bile.

Those mer­gers give the FCC a new tool to ad­dress the con­ten­tious is­sue of net neut­ral­ity.

The FCC en­acted net-neut­ral­ity rules in 2010, but a fed­er­al Ap­peals Court struck down those rules earli­er this year. FCC Chair­man Tom Wheel­er is now try­ing to re­write the reg­u­la­tions in a way that can sur­vive fu­ture court chal­lenges.

But many lib­er­al law­makers, tech com­pan­ies, and act­iv­ists are out­raged that Wheel­er’s pro­pos­al could al­low In­ter­net ser­vice pro­viders to charge web­sites for faster ser­vice in some cases. They warn that “fast lanes” would tilt the In­ter­net in fa­vor of the richest cor­por­a­tions, leav­ing every­one else lag­ging be­hind. They ar­gue that In­ter­net pro­viders should be re­quired to treat all traffic equally.

Act­iv­ists camped out­side the FCC over the is­sue, and guards had to drag out sev­er­al pro­test­ers who stood up and began shout­ing at the com­mis­sion­ers at the FCC’s most re­cent pub­lic meet­ing.

The FCC can use mer­ger con­di­tions to soften some of that blow­back. Even though a court said the FCC lacked the leg­al au­thor­ity for the stronger net-neut­ral­ity rules, the agency could still force mer­ging com­pan­ies to abide by the now-de­funct reg­u­la­tions.

Com­cast is already bound by the old rules un­til 2018 as a con­di­tion of its 2011 pur­chase of NBC-Uni­ver­sal. The cable gi­ant has prom­ised to ex­tend that pro­tec­tion to Time Warner Cable cus­tom­ers if the mer­ger is ap­proved. AT&T has also offered to abide by the old reg­u­la­tions for three years if reg­u­lat­ors let it buy Dir­ecTV.

Those of­fers are really just open­ing bids in ne­go­ti­ations with reg­u­lat­ors, and the FCC could likely force the com­pan­ies to ac­cept even longer net-neut­ral­ity com­mit­ments.

Wal­ter Piecyk, an in­dustry ana­lyst with the firm BTIG, said the flurry of trans­ac­tions gives the FCC a “unique” op­por­tun­ity to ad­dress the pub­lic pres­sure over net neut­ral­ity.

“There’s a solu­tion sit­ting right in front of it,” he said.

The agency could even im­pose reg­u­la­tions that go well bey­ond its 2010 net-neut­ral­ity or­der. The old rules ap­plied min­im­al re­quire­ments for In­ter­net ser­vice on mo­bile devices. The FCC could force AT&T to ac­cept new net-neut­ral­ity re­quire­ments for cell-phone ser­vice as a con­di­tion of its Dir­ecTV deal, and Sprint would likely ac­cept tough­er rules if it were al­lowed to buy T-Mo­bile.

The mer­gers also give the FCC a chance to ex­per­i­ment with new reg­u­la­tions of net­work con­nec­tion deals — a sep­ar­ate but re­lated top­ic to net neut­ral­ity. The is­sue has promp­ted grow­ing con­cern in re­cent months after Net­flix had to pay Com­cast and Ve­r­i­zon to con­nect dir­ectly to their net­works.

The net-neut­ral­ity reg­u­la­tions gov­ern only how In­ter­net pro­viders handle traffic flow­ing over the last mile of cable in­to con­sumers’ homes — not how net­works con­nect to each oth­er. But by re­fus­ing to al­low Net­flix to con­nect dir­ectly to their net­works, the broad­band com­pan­ies can ef­fect­ively throttle Net­flix’s ser­vice, res­ult­ing in more buf­fer­ing and lower-qual­ity videos.

Wheel­er has said he wants to look in­to the is­sue, but he hasn’t spe­cified wheth­er he will push new reg­u­la­tions.

An­oth­er top pri­or­ity of the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion is uni­ver­sal In­ter­net ac­cess. Of­fi­cials ar­gue that a high-speed In­ter­net con­nec­tion is an es­sen­tial part of par­ti­cip­at­ing in the mod­ern eco­nomy. The FCC could ad­vance that goal by re­quir­ing com­pan­ies to build out to more rur­al areas and of­fer cheap plans to low-in­come con­sumers.

As part of the NBC deal, Com­cast agreed to of­fer an “In­ter­net Es­sen­tials” plan to low-in­come fam­il­ies, but con­sumer groups have ques­tioned the ef­fect­ive­ness of the pro­gram.

Wheel­er is clearly open to us­ing mer­ger con­di­tions as a policy tool. In a per­son­al blog post be­fore he was nom­in­ated to lead the agency, Wheel­er wrote that the FCC should use AT&T’s bid to buy T-Mo­bile as a “back­door to im­pos­ing a new reg­u­lat­ory re­gime” that “could ul­ti­mately spread to all wire­less car­ri­ers.” The FCC and the Justice De­part­ment blocked that deal out­right in 2011.

But Re­pub­lic­ans have cri­ti­cized the FCC in re­cent years for reg­u­lat­ing through mer­gers. They ar­gue that con­di­tions on deals should be nar­rowly tailored to ad­dress the pos­sible harms of the deal rather than pur­su­ing broad policy goals.

“Con­gress nev­er in­ten­ded for the FCC’s trans­ac­tion re­view au­thor­ity to be used as a ‘back­door’ poli­cy­mak­ing tool that lacks both trans­par­ency and ju­di­cial re­view,” Sen. John Thune, the top Re­pub­lic­an on the Sen­ate Com­merce Com­mit­tee, said last year dur­ing Wheel­er’s con­firm­a­tion hear­ing. “We already have too many fed­er­al agen­cies car­ry­ing out their own agen­das and over­step­ping their con­gres­sion­al man­dates — we don’t need the FCC to be an­oth­er one.”

John Bergmay­er, a seni­or staff at­tor­ney for the con­sumer ad­vocacy group Pub­lic Know­ledge, said mer­ger con­di­tions can be “tempt­ing” but that they’re “not really the best way to set policy.”

He ar­gued that net-neut­ral­ity rules should ap­ply in­dustry-wide and not ex­pire in a few years. He also ar­gued that no amount of con­di­tions would make the Com­cast pur­chase of Time Warner Cable good for con­sumers.

“The best way to pre­vent the mer­ger-spe­cif­ic harms is to just pre­vent the mer­ger,” he said.

What We're Following See More »
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
15 hours ago

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
1 days ago

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
1 days ago

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
1 days ago
California: It’s Not Over Yet
1 days ago

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.