Internet Providers Sent 1.3 Million Warnings to Alleged Pirates

Movie studios and record labels don’t need a court to go after copyright violations.

National Journal
Brendan Sasso
May 28, 2014, 10:06 a.m.

In­ter­net ser­vice pro­viders and the en­ter­tain­ment in­dustry are ramp­ing up their joint ini­ti­at­ive to crack down on on­line pir­acy without go­ing through lengthy court pro­ceed­ings.

In 2013, In­ter­net pro­viders sent 1.3 mil­lion no­tices over al­leged copy­right vi­ol­a­tions, ac­cord­ing to the first stat­ist­ics on the Copy­right Alert Sys­tem, which were re­leased Wed­nes­day. People who con­tin­ue to il­leg­ally share songs or movies face gradu­ally in­creas­ing sanc­tions.

Ac­cord­ing to the re­port, 60,477 people last year re­ceived a fifth “strike” and 37,456 re­ceived a sixth “strike.” Un­der the pro­gram, In­ter­net pro­viders en­force “mit­ig­a­tion” meas­ures for the fifth and sixth of­fenses. Of­fend­ers who reach those stages can be forced to re­view copy­right edu­ca­tion ma­ter­i­als be­fore ac­cess­ing the In­ter­net or have their In­ter­net speed re­duced.

The pro­gram is ex­pec­ted to double in size this year.

The ma­jor movie stu­di­os and re­cord la­bels ne­go­ti­ated with the five largest In­ter­net pro­viders to de­vel­op the pro­gram in a bid to curb on­line pir­acy, which they say is drain­ing bil­lions of dol­lars from their in­dustry. Un­der the sys­tem, the copy­right hold­ers identi­fy the IP ad­dress that is al­legedly shar­ing the ma­ter­i­al without per­mis­sion and then no­ti­fy the In­ter­net pro­vider as­signed to the ac­count. The en­ter­tain­ment com­pan­ies em­phas­ize that the pur­pose of the pro­gram is to bet­ter edu­cate the pub­lic about copy­right in­fringe­ment.

Al­though no judge or court is in­volved, con­sumers can ap­peal the alerts and sanc­tions for $35. Ac­cord­ing to the re­port, only 265 people ap­pealed any of the 1.3 mil­lion alerts. There were no in­val­id no­tices, but 47 people won their chal­lenges on the grounds that someone else was us­ing the ac­count to il­leg­ally share the ma­ter­i­al.

Jill Less­er, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Cen­ter for Copy­right In­form­a­tion, which over­sees the sys­tem, said the pro­gram has the po­ten­tial to “move the needle in de­ter­ring copy­right in­fringe­ment.”

Chris Dodd, the head of the Mo­tion Pic­ture As­so­ci­ation of Amer­ica, said the pro­gram is still in its early stages but that the res­ults are “en­cour­aging.”

“It is go­ing to take every­one work­ing to­geth­er — both here in the United States and abroad — to find a way to cre­ate an In­ter­net that works for every­one,” he said. “The Copy­right Alert Sys­tem shows that col­lab­or­a­tion is pos­sible in our ef­forts against pir­acy.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
4 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×