Why an Iranian Judge Summoned Mark Zuckerberg to Court

Weeks after an Iranian ban on WhatsApp was overturned, an Iranian judge wants “the Zionist director of Facebook” to answer privacy questions.

National Journal
Kaveh Waddell
See more stories about...
Kaveh Waddell
May 27, 2014, 11:36 a.m.

Con­ser­vat­ive and re­form­ist ele­ments of the Ir­a­ni­an polit­ic­al ma­chine clashed on Tues­day when a judge con­demned What­s­App and In­s­tagram just weeks after a pro­posed ban on What­s­App was over­turned by Ir­an’s pres­id­ent.

A court in the Fars province in south­ern Ir­an summoned Face­book CEO Mark Zuck­er­berg in re­sponse to “many cit­izens’ com­plaints” about the pri­vacy vi­ol­a­tions of two Face­book-owned ap­plic­a­tions, In­s­tagram and What­s­App, Ir­an’s se­mi­of­fi­cial ISNA news agency re­por­ted on Tues­day.

Ruhol­lah Mo­men-Nasab, an in­form­a­tion-tech­no­logy of­fi­cial with the para­mil­it­ary Basij or­gan­iz­a­tion, called for “the Zion­ist dir­ect­or of Face­book” or his at­tor­ney to ap­pear in the Ir­a­ni­an court to de­fend Face­book and pay pos­sible dam­ages. Zuck­er­berg is un­likely to vis­it Ir­an to stand tri­al: The United States and Ir­an do not have an ex­tra­di­tion agree­ment, and the Face­book CEO has no in­cent­ive to vol­un­tar­ily ap­pear in court.

In­s­tagram, a photo-shar­ing ser­vice, and What­s­App, an in­stant-mes­saging ap­plic­a­tion, are of­ten blocked in Ir­an, and some so­cial-me­dia ser­vices such as Face­book, You­Tube, and Twit­ter are al­most al­ways banned. Des­pite these In­ter­net fil­ters, high-level Ir­a­ni­an of­fi­cials such as Pres­id­ent Has­san Rouh­ani, For­eign Min­is­ter Javad Za­rif, and even Su­preme Lead­er Ali Khame­nei are act­ive on so­cial me­dia, and many Ir­a­ni­ans use proxy ser­vices to cir­cum­vent gov­ern­ment fil­ters.

In­con­sist­ent mes­saging with­in Ir­an over so­cial me­dia is rep­res­ent­at­ive of a per­sist­ent struggle in the coun­try between re­form-minded Rouh­ani and the hard-line politi­cians who op­pose him. Rouh­ani chal­lenged a ban on What­s­App that was ori­gin­ally pro­posed in early May, un­will­ing to block a widely used ser­vice without an al­tern­at­ive in place. “We should see the cy­ber­world as an op­por­tun­ity,” the Ir­a­ni­an pres­id­ent said earli­er this month. “Why are we so shaky? Why don’t we trust our youth?”

An­oth­er ex­plan­a­tion for Ir­an’s at­temp­ted ban on What­s­App and oth­er mes­saging ser­vices is that the coun­try’s tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions in­dustry is try­ing to pro­tect its pock­et­book. The na­tion­al Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions Com­pany of Ir­an has lost rev­en­ue to mes­saging ser­vices such as What­s­App, BBC Per­sian re­ports, and could be ap­ply­ing pres­sure to main­tain its hold over Ir­a­ni­ans’ com­mu­nic­a­tions.

As Ir­a­ni­an politi­cians work out their dif­fer­ences, then, Zuck­er­berg might do well to avoid the scen­ic Fars province.

What We're Following See More »
Clinton Campaign Also Hacked
10 hours ago
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
11 hours ago

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.