The Supreme Court Is About to Decide the Future of TV

Broadcasters are asking the Court to kill the video site Aereo.

National Journal
Brendan Sasso
April 20, 2014, 7:22 a.m.

The Su­preme Court will hear ar­gu­ments Tues­day in a case that could shape the fu­ture of tele­vi­sion and even the In­ter­net.

All of the ma­jor TV net­works are su­ing to shut down Aereo, a ser­vice that lets sub­scribers watch and re­cord loc­al TV chan­nels on their com­puters, tab­lets, phones, and In­ter­net-con­nec­ted TVs for as little as $8 per month. The prob­lem is that un­like cable pro­viders, Aereo doesn’t pay the TV sta­tions for their con­tent.

Every­one has the right to ac­cess over-the-air TV chan­nels us­ing an an­tenna. Aereo calls it­self a “mod­ern-day tele­vi­sion an­tenna and DVR.” But Aereo sub­scribers don’t have an­tenna arms stick­ing out of their tab­let com­puters. In­stead, Aereo uses a cluster of thou­sands of tiny an­ten­nas to de­liv­er video over the In­ter­net to all of the sub­scribers in an area. Tech­nic­ally, sub­scribers are rent­ing ac­cess to one of those an­ten­nas.

The com­pany says it’s just mak­ing it easi­er to watch over-the-air TV. The ser­vice, which is cur­rently avail­able in only 11 cit­ies, is es­pe­cially ap­peal­ing to young people who want to drop their pricey cable pack­ages for Net­flix, Amazon Prime, and oth­er on­line op­tions, but don’t want to miss out on sports and loc­al news.

But ABC, NBC, CBS, and Fox have all sued, claim­ing that Aereo is steal­ing their con­tent. The video site has won some de­cisions in the lower courts, but the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion has weighed in with a brief on the side of the broad­casters.

The TV net­works claim that their en­tire busi­ness mod­el is in danger if Aereo wins, and they’ve hired the best law­yers money can buy. Paul Clem­ent, a former so­li­cit­or gen­er­al who ar­gued be­fore the Su­preme Court to try to over­turn the pres­id­ent’s health care law, will rep­res­ent the TV sta­tions on Tues­day.

A host of tech­no­logy com­pan­ies have come to Aereo’s de­fense, warn­ing that a de­cision against the video ser­vice could threaten oth­er “cloud” stor­age sites like Drop­box.

What Hap­pens If Aereo Wins?

The TV broad­casters fear an Aereo vic­tory could doom their whole in­dustry. While broad­cast TV is free over the air, most people watch their loc­al TV chan­nels through a sub­scrip­tion from their cable or satel­lite pro­vider. Un­like Aereo, those pro­viders pay the TV broad­casters for their chan­nels.

Broad­casters have been ne­go­ti­at­ing for high­er and high­er pay­ments in re­cent years, and so-called “re­trans­mis­sion fees” now ac­count for an es­tim­ated $3.3 bil­lion in rev­en­ue every year.

The fear is that if Aereo wins, cable pro­viders could cut off those pay­ments, either by en­ter­ing in­to an agree­ment with Aereo or mim­ick­ing the com­pany’s tech­no­logy. Even if cable com­pan­ies don’t fol­low through with that threat, an Aereo vic­tory could give them lever­age to drive down pay­ments to broad­casters. Lower re­trans­mis­sion fees could mean lower cable bills for con­sumers (or just high­er profits for the cable com­pan­ies). (Stephanie Stamm)

Ex­ec­ut­ives at the ma­jor TV net­works say they can’t sur­vive without re­trans­mis­sion fees. In a fil­ing to the Su­preme Court, the net­works warned that Aereo “im­per­ils “¦ the vi­ab­il­ity of over-the-air broad­cast tele­vi­sion.”

If the Su­preme Court con­cludes that Aereo isn’t vi­ol­at­ing the law, the first thing the broad­casters will prob­ably try to do is get Con­gress to change the law. They ar­gue that Aereo is try­ing to ex­ploit a loop­hole in copy­right law, and if the Court doesn’t shut the com­pany down, then Con­gress should just close the loop­hole. Broad­casters con­tin­ue to have im­press­ive clout on Cap­it­ol Hill and are used to get­ting what they want.

The broad­casters have already threatened that if the Court and Con­gress re­fuse to stop Aereo, they may pull their pro­gram­ming off the air.

“If we can’t have our rights prop­erly pro­tec­ted through leg­al and polit­ic­al av­en­ues, we will pur­sue busi­ness solu­tions,” News Corp. Pres­id­ent Chase Carey said last year. “One such busi­ness solu­tion would be to take the net­work and turn it in­to a sub­scrip­tion ser­vice.”

It’s un­clear what that threat would mean ex­actly and wheth­er broad­casters would con­sider shut­ting down en­tirely. A more likely res­ult is that the net­works would move pop­u­lar pro­gram­ming like sports and prime-time shows to cable chan­nels and leave lower-cost con­tent (like re-runs) on their broad­cast sta­tions.

What If the TV Net­works Win?

A loss in the Su­preme Court is the end of the road for Aereo.

“If we lose, we’re fin­ished,” Barry Diller, a me­dia mogul and the main in­vestor in Aereo, said in an in­ter­view this month on Bloomberg TV. “Aereo would prob­ably not be able to con­tin­ue in busi­ness.”

But the case could have im­plic­a­tions for more than just the one small In­ter­net com­pany. Some tech groups and In­ter­net act­iv­ists warn that the Su­preme Court could throw cloud-com­put­ing com­pan­ies in­to leg­al jeop­ardy.

Like Aereo, com­pan­ies in­clud­ing Google, Amazon, Apple, and Drop­box al­low users to re­motely ac­cess copy­righted ma­ter­i­al. If the Court holds that Aereo’s re­mote-an­tenna sys­tem qual­i­fies as a “pub­lic per­form­ance,” and there­fore re­quires a copy­right li­cense, it could threaten com­pan­ies with sim­il­ar busi­ness mod­els.  

In a brief to the Su­preme Court, the so­li­cit­or gen­er­al ar­gued that Aereo is dif­fer­ent than oth­er cloud pro­viders be­cause for oth­er ser­vices, con­sumers are gen­er­ally play­ing back a copy­righted work that they ac­quired leg­ally in the first place.

The of­fice, which rep­res­ents the U.S. gov­ern­ment be­fore the Su­preme Court, said the con­clu­sion that Aereo is il­leg­al “should not call in­to ques­tion the le­git­im­acy of busi­nesses that use the In­ter­net to provide new ways for con­sumers to store, hear, and view their own law­fully ac­quired cop­ies of copy­righted works.”

But the Com­puter and Com­mu­nic­a­tions In­dustry As­so­ci­ation, a lob­by­ing group that in­cludes Google, Mi­crosoft, Ya­hoo, and Aereo, said the U.S. gov­ern­ment’s test is “un­work­able and will en­danger the thriv­ing cloud com­put­ing in­dustry just as it starts to ma­ture.”

Even if courts don’t ul­ti­mately shut down oth­er cloud com­pan­ies, a rul­ing against Aereo could res­ult in “years of costly lit­ig­a­tion, chilling much valu­able in­nov­a­tion in the mean­time,” the as­so­ci­ation warned.

What We're Following See More »
“CLINTON MUST BECOME THE NEXT PRESIDENT”
Bernie Sanders Seeks to Unite the Party
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Instead of his usual stump speech, Bernie Sanders tonight threw his support behind Hillary Clinton, providing a clear contrast between Clinton and GOP nominee Donald Trump on the many issues he used to discuss in his campaign stump speeches. Sanders spoke glowingly about the presumptive Democratic nominee, lauding her work as first lady and as a strong advocate for women and the poor. “We need leadership in this country which will improve the lives of working families, the children, the elderly, the sick and the poor,” he said. “Hillary Clinton will make a great president, and I am proud to stand with her tonight."

“MUST NEVER BE PRESIDENT”
Elizabeth Warren Goes After Donald Trump
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In a stark contrast from Michelle Obama's uplifting speech, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren spoke about the rigged system plaguing Americans before launching into a full-throated rebuke of GOP nominee Donald Trump. Trump is "a man who has never sacrificed anything for anyone," she claimed, before saying he "must never be president of the United States." She called him divisive and selfish, and said the American people won't accept his "hate-filled America." In addition to Trump, Warren went after the Republican Party as a whole. "To Republicans in Congress who said no, this November the American people are coming for you," she said.

FLOTUS OFFERS STRONG ENDORSEMENT OF CLINTON
Michelle Obama: “I Trust” Hillary Clinton
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"In this election, and every election, it's about who will have the power to shape our children for the next four or eight years of their lives," Michelle Obama said. "There is only one person who I trust with that responsibility … and that is our friend Hillary Clinton." In a personal and emotional speech, Michelle Obama spoke about the effect that angry oppositional rhetoric had on her children and how she chose to raise them. "When they go low, we go high," Obama said she told her children about dealing with bullies. Obama stayed mostly positive, but still offered a firm rebuke of Donald Trump, despite never once uttering his name. "The issues a president faces cannot be boiled down to 140 characters," she said.

SANDERS BACKER CONFRONTS STUBBORN SANDERS SUPPORTERS
Sarah Silverman to Bernie or Bust: “You’re Being Ridiculous”
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Many Bernie Sanders delegates have spent much of the first day of the Democratic National Convention resisting unity, booing at mentions of Hillary Clinton and often chanting "Bernie! Bernie!" Well, one of the most outspoken Bernie Sanders supporters just told them to take a seat. "To the Bernie-or-bust people: You're being ridiculous," said comedian Sarah Silverman in a brief appearance at the Convention, minutes after saying that she would proudly support Hillary Clinton for president.

‘INEXCUSABLE REMARKS’
DNC Formally Apologizes to Bernie Sanders
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Democratic National Committee issued a formal apology to Bernie Sanders today, after leaked emails showed staffers trying to sabotage his presidential bid. "On behalf of everyone at the DNC, we want to offer a deep and sincere apology to Senator Sanders, his supporters, and the entire Democratic Party for the inexcusable remarks made over email," DNC officials said in the statement. "These comments do not reflect the values of the DNC or our steadfast commitment to neutrality during the nominating process. The DNC does not—and will not—tolerate disrespectful language exhibited toward our candidates."

Source:
×