Why Is Aerosmith So Mad at Pandora?

After a legal setback, Steven Tyler is asking Congress to change the legal scene for songwriters.

Steven Tyler performs onstage at 'Howard Stern's Birthday Bash' presented by SiriusXM, produced by Howard Stern Productions at Hammerstein Ballroom on January 31, 2014 in New York City.
National Journal
Laura Ryan
April 3, 2014, 1:30 a.m.

Pan­dora re­cently won a key leg­al vic­tory in its on­go­ing leg­al battle with song­writers, but there’s no end in sight for the leg­al spat between the com­pany and the writers whose songs it plays.

At is­sue are the roy­alty fees that Pan­dora pays song­writers in ex­change for the rights to their mu­sic cata­logs. The Amer­ic­an So­ci­ety of Com­posers, Au­thors, and Pub­lish­ers — the coun­try’s old­est and largest per­form­ing rights or­gan­iz­a­tion — and Pan­dora have been bat­tling in court for over two years years over roy­alty rates.

The latest rul­ing came in March, when New York Dis­trict Court Judge Den­ise Cote de­cided that Pan­dora must pay AS­CAP 1.85 per­cent the com­pany’s an­nu­al rev­en­ue in ex­change for a blanket li­cense to the 100-year-old song­writers group’s mu­sic­al lib­rary.

At first glance, Cote’s de­cision keeps the status quo: Cote re­jec­ted AS­CAP’s ar­gu­ments for a high­er rate while also re­ject­ing Pan­dora’s re­quest to pay the lower rate that is awar­ded to to tra­di­tion­al AM/FM ra­dio.

That or­der leaves in place a leg­al frame­work dat­ing back to 1941, when the Justice De­part­ment set up a reg­u­lat­ory ar­range­ment that de­cides how much cus­tom­ers, such as ra­dio sta­tions or res­taur­ants, pay AS­CAP for the rights to play their cata­log of mu­sic in pub­lic. Un­der the or­der, AS­CAP is ob­lig­ated to is­sue a com­puls­ory li­cense to in­ter­ested parties, and if the two groups fail to ne­go­ti­ate a roy­alty rate, the rate is set by a fed­er­al judge. But in set­ting the rate, judges are bound by a set of para­met­ers that have thus far kept roy­alty pay­ments at a rate Pan­dora can stom­ach.

Cote’s 136-page de­cision, however, con­tained lan­guage sid­ing strongly with Oak­land, Cal­if.-based Pan­dora — and leav­ing the song­writers plenty of reas­on for con­cern. She had some harsh words for mu­sic ex­ec­ut­ives, writ­ing that the “driv­ing force was the mu­sic pub­lish­ers’ envy at the rate their sound re­cord­ing brethren had ex­trac­ted from Pan­dora.”

In­deed, song­writers have plenty to envy about their per­form­ing peers. Pan­dora pays re­cord­ing artists and re­cord la­bels about 50 per­cent of its rev­en­ue, while only pay­ing song­writers and pub­lish­ers about 4 per­cent total (AS­CAP is one of three ma­jor per­form­ing-rights or­gan­iz­a­tions).

And the mu­sic in­dustry is none too pleased about it. Cue Steven Tyler, the Aer­o­s­mith front man turned roy­alty-rate war­ri­or.

Tyler was in Wash­ing­ton last week to speak up against the gulf in roy­al­ties rates, and he came to Cap­it­ol Hill with a three let­ter mes­sage: “W-T-F.”

“If the laws con­tin­ue go­ing the way they are, [song­writers] will nev­er be paid fairly for [their] own par­ti­cip­a­tion,” Tyler said at an event hos­ted by the Na­tion­al Mu­sic Pub­lish­ers As­so­ci­ation. “So people, for­give me for be­ing a little jaded about the state of copy­right.”

Song­writers are step­ping up ef­forts to get at the root of the prob­lem: chan­ging the reg­u­lat­ory sys­tem dat­ing back to WWII.

“[The Pan­dora] rul­ing con­firms what we already knew - song­writers will nev­er be paid fairly as long as they must labor un­der World War II era con­sent de­crees,” NMPA Pres­id­ent and CEO Dav­id Is­rael­ite said in a state­ment. 

And law­makers, at least a few of them, are listen­ing. Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Doug Collins of Geor­gia in Feb­ru­ary in­tro­duced le­gis­la­tion that would al­low fed­er­al courts more flex­ib­il­ity in de­cid­ing li­cens­ing fees, like let­ting judges take in­to con­sid­er­a­tion how much re­cord la­bels re­ceive when set­ting rates for pub­lish­ers.

House Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee Chair­man Bob Good­latte is also lead­ing a com­pre­hens­ive re­view of copy­right laws, al­though re­form would likely take years.

In the mean­time, Pan­dora still isn’t in the clear. The In­ter­net ra­dio pos­ted a profit at the end of 2013 for the first time in a few years. Pan­dora blames li­cens­ing pay­ments for their on­go­ing fin­an­cial struggles, re­cently cit­ing rising pay­outs to re­cord la­bels as the reas­on be­hind the com­pany’s de­cision to raise sub­scrip­tion fees. 

While the com­pany es­caped a blow in the AS­CAP suit, it still faces a cloudy leg­al fu­ture. Pan­dora is locked in a sim­il­ar leg­al fight with Broad­cast Mu­sic Inc. — the second-largest per­form­ing-rights or­gan­iz­a­tion, bet­ter known as BMI, bound by a sim­il­ar con­sent de­cree that has han­di­capped AS­CAP — that is also seek­ing a big­ger piece of Pan­dora’s fin­an­cial pie.

And even if Pan­dora se­cures an­oth­er win, some are con­cerned that ma­jor pub­lish­ers, like Sony/ATV and Uni­ver­sal, could de­cide to pull their mu­sic cata­logs from the AS­CAP or BMI en­tirely in a last-ditch ef­fort to get out from un­der the con­sent de­cree to ne­go­ti­ate fees dir­ectly with Pan­dora.

“If we can’t se­cure ad­just­ments to the con­sent de­crees, which were last mod­i­fied be­fore the in­tro­duc­tion of the iPod, we’ll have no choice but to con­sider some rad­ic­al steps in or­der to en­sure our writers are fairly com­pensated in the rap­idly chan­ging mar­ket­place,” Zach Horow­itz, chair­man of the Uni­ver­sal Mu­sic Pub­lish­ing Group, told the New York Times

If that hap­pens, it would mean either a big leap in li­cens­ing fees or a smal­ler mu­sic lib­rary for Pan­dora. 

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×