How the NSA Used a ‘Loophole’ to Spy on Americans

Obama’s intel czar confirms targeting U.S. communications.

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 29: A member of CodePink protests as Director of National Intelligence James Clapper (C) takes his seat prior to a hearing before the House (Select) Intelligence Committee October 29, 2013 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. The committee held a hearing on "Potential Changes to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)." 
Getty Images
Brendan Sasso
April 1, 2014, 1:28 p.m.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s top in­tel­li­gence of­fi­cial has con­firmed that the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency in­ten­tion­ally spied on the com­mu­nic­a­tions of Amer­ic­ans un­der a law in­ten­ded to ap­ply only to for­eign­ers.

Dir­ect­or of Na­tion­al In­tel­li­gence James Clap­per con­firmed the sur­veil­lance in a let­ter re­spond­ing to ques­tion­ing from Sen. Ron Wyden, an Ore­gon Demo­crat. The agency spied on the ac­tu­al con­tents of com­mu­nic­a­tions without a war­rant — not just “metadata” such as call times and phone num­bers.

“This is un­ac­cept­able. It raises ser­i­ous con­sti­tu­tion­al ques­tions, and poses a real threat to the pri­vacy rights of law-abid­ing Amer­ic­ans,” Wyden and Sen. Mark Ud­all, a Col­or­ado Demo­crat, said in a state­ment.

“If a gov­ern­ment agency thinks that a par­tic­u­lar Amer­ic­an is en­gaged in ter­ror­ism or es­pi­on­age, the Fourth Amend­ment re­quires that the gov­ern­ment se­cure a war­rant or emer­gency au­thor­iz­a­tion be­fore mon­it­or­ing his or her com­mu­nic­a­tions,” the sen­at­ors said. “This fact should be bey­ond dis­pute.”

Sec­tion 702 of the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Act gives the NSA broad power to listen in on phone calls and ac­cess emails. But the law cov­ers only non-Amer­ic­ans loc­ated out­side of the United States.

The agency some­times col­lects Amer­ic­ans’ in­form­a­tion as it scoops up vast amounts of data on for­eign­ers. In his let­ter to Wyden, Clap­per re­vealed that the NSA has searched through that data­base spe­cific­ally look­ing for Amer­ic­ans’ com­mu­nic­a­tions.

“There have been quer­ies, us­ing US per­son iden­ti­fi­ers, of com­mu­nic­a­tions law­fully ac­quired to ob­tain for­eign in­tel­li­gence tar­get­ing non-US per­sons reas­on­ably be­lieved to be loc­ated out­side the United States,” Clap­per wrote.

The state­ment con­firms that the NSA has been tak­ing ad­vant­age of a secret rule change first re­vealed by The Guard­i­an in Au­gust, based on doc­u­ments leaked by Ed­ward Snowden.

It’s un­clear how many Amer­ic­ans have been af­fected by the sur­veil­lance, though the pro­gram is pre­sum­ably much smal­ler than the NSA’s bulk col­lec­tion of mil­lions of phone re­cords. But un­like that bulk data col­lec­tion, Sec­tion 702 al­lows the NSA to listen to calls and read emails.

In their state­ment, Wyden and Ud­all said the con­firm­a­tion from Clap­per shows that Con­gress must en­sure it closes the “loop­hole” in Sec­tion 702 to re­quire that the NSA has to show prob­able cause of wrong­do­ing be­fore tar­get­ing in­di­vidu­al Amer­ic­ans.

The Demo­crats also made a veiled swipe at Pres­id­ent Obama, who re­as­sured Amer­ic­ans that “nobody is listen­ing to your tele­phone calls.”

“Seni­or of­fi­cials have some­times sug­ges­ted that gov­ern­ment agen­cies do not de­lib­er­ately read Amer­ic­ans’ emails, mon­it­or their on­line activ­ity or listen to their phone calls without a war­rant,” the sen­at­ors said. “However, the facts show that those sug­ges­tions were mis­lead­ing, and that in­tel­li­gence agen­cies have in­deed con­duc­ted war­rant­less searches for Amer­ic­ans’ com­mu­nic­a­tions.”

Jeff An­chukait­is, a spokes­man for Clap­per, said the dir­ect­or’s of­fice already de­clas­si­fied doc­u­ments re­lated to the sur­veil­lance of people with­in the U.S. un­der Sec­tion 702 in Au­gust.

He em­phas­ized that the “au­thor­ity is sub­ject to strict over­sight by the De­part­ment of Justice and the Of­fice of the Dir­ect­or of Na­tion­al In­tel­li­gence to en­sure com­pli­ance with the min­im­iz­a­tion pro­ced­ures, and that there were no in­ten­tion­al vi­ol­a­tions of those pro­ced­ures.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4850) }}

What We're Following See More »
Sanders and Clinton Spar Over … President Obama
5 hours ago

President Obama became a surprise topic of contention toward the end of the Democratic debate, as Hillary Clinton reminded viewers that Sanders had challenged the progressive bona fides of President Obama in 2011 and suggested that someone might challenge him from the left. “The kind of criticism that we’ve heard from Senator Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama,” she said. “Madame Secretary, that is a low blow,” replied Sanders, before getting in another dig during his closing statement: “One of us ran against Barack Obama. I was not that candidate.”

THE 1%
Sanders’s Appeals to Minorities Still Filtered Through Wall Street Talk
6 hours ago

It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”

Clinton Already Pivoting Her Messaging
7 hours ago

It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.

How Many Jobs Would Be Lost Under Bernie Sanders’s Single-Payer System?
15 hours ago

More than 11 million, according to Manhattan Institute fellow Yevgeniy Feyman, writing in RealClearPolicy.

State to Release 550 More Clinton Emails on Saturday
15 hours ago

Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.