Newt Gingrich’s Plan to Stave Off the Apocalypse

Whether it’s from solar explosions or North Korean nukes, Newt has a plan to save the world.

National Journal
Alex Brown
March 28, 2014, 1 a.m.

With­in a year, nine out of 10 Amer­ic­ans could be dead. And whatever causes the na­tion­al apo­ca­lypse — be it North Korean malice or the whims of the sun — the down­fall will ul­ti­mately be our own fault.

That’s the fear of Newt Gin­grich and oth­er mem­bers of a high-pro­file co­ali­tion who are con­vinced that our fra­gile elec­tric­al grid could be wiped out at any mo­ment.

Their con­cern? Elec­tro­mag­net­ic pulses, the short bursts of en­ergy — caused by any­thing from a nuc­le­ar blast to a sol­ar flare — that can wreak hav­oc on elec­tric­al sys­tems on a massive scale. And the co­ali­tion be­lieves it’s com­ing soon.

“I think we’re run­ning out of time,” said Peter Pry, a former CIA of­ficer and head of a con­gres­sion­al ad­vis­ory board on na­tion­al se­cur­ity. And if the worst hap­pens? “This gets trans­lated in­to mass fatal­it­ies, be­cause our mod­ern civil­iz­a­tion can’t feed, trans­port, or provide law and or­der without elec­tri­city,” he said.

While some see the co­ali­tion as alarm­ist — and oth­ers dis­miss them as out-and-out quacks — the co­ali­tion boasts some prom­in­ent and in­flu­en­tial names. Pry and Gin­grich are joined by former CIA Dir­ect­or James Wool­sey.

“It wasn’t dif­fi­cult per­suad­ing them” to join the co­ali­tion, Pry said. Gin­grich “has known about EMP and cared about it for many years.”

Last year, Gin­grich told mem­bers of Con­gress that an EMP at­tack “could be the kind of cata­strophe that ends civil­iz­a­tion — and that’s not an ex­ag­ger­a­tion.”

The co­ali­tion’s mem­bers in­sist the scen­ario is a real threat, and not the plot of a Mi­chael Bay movie or a Cor­mac Mc­Carthy nov­el. They be­lieve a single nuc­le­ar blast at 300-400 kilo­met­ers in alti­tude — about the height of the In­ter­na­tion­al Space Sta­tion — could take down all power in the U.S. Even an ex­plo­sion just 30 kilo­met­ers up would take out the East­ern grid, which sup­plies three-quar­ters of the coun­try’s power.

What hap­pens post-det­on­a­tion is not a pretty pic­ture, Pry says: “You’d have massive in­dus­tri­al ac­ci­dents. One hun­dred four nuc­le­ar re­act­ors go­ing Fukushi­ma, spread­ing tox­ic clouds every­where. Oil re­finer­ies burn­ing down, oil pipelines ex­plod­ing.”¦ Air­liners crash­ing down.”

That’s just day one. With no power, the coun­try would lose trans­port­a­tion, our food would go bad and we’d lose the com­mu­nic­a­tion tools we’ve come to rely on. To en­vi­sion what that would look like, just pic­ture New Or­leans after Hur­ricane Kat­rina, Pry says.

The co­ali­tion es­tim­ates that we’d lose up to 90 per­cent of our pop­u­la­tion with­in a year.

But it wouldn’t ne­ces­sar­ily take a hos­tile for­eign power’s nuc­le­ar trick­ery to spark the down­fall: The co­ali­tion claims Amer­ic­an de­mise could come from the flares of a fickle sun.

A gi­ant sol­ar flare that trig­gers a geo­mag­net­ic storm could in­flict the same dam­age as a high-alti­tude nuc­le­ar blast — but do it on a glob­al scale.

The last such flare — known as the Car­ring­ton Event — happened in 1859, fry­ing tele­graph lines around the plan­et. Ac­cord­ing to Pry, such events hap­pen about every 150 years, so we’re already over­due for an­oth­er.

By com­par­is­on, a Lloyd’s of Lon­don study used a wider range of 100-250 years. The study also said a sol­ar event would only cause ex­ten­ded black­outs for 20-40 mil­lion people — not an in­sig­ni­fic­ant num­ber, but nowhere near the globe-en­com­passing dis­aster the EMP Co­ali­tion pre­dicts.

And Kris­tof Pet­ro­vay, a Hun­gary-based sol­ar phys­i­cist whose work is of­ten cited by NASA, said pre­dict­ing the in­ter­val of such flares is more-or-less a fool’s er­rand. “There’s really no way to tell when or how of­ten it will hap­pen again,” Pet­ro­vay said.

Re­gard­less of when or if an­oth­er flare hits, there’s a wide range of as­sess­ments of its po­ten­tial dam­age.

Most ob­serv­ers stop short of fore­cast­ing the dooms­day scen­ari­os laid out by the Pry-Gin­grich co­ali­tion, but they still see ser­i­ous prob­lems.

In 2008, the Na­tion­al Academy of Sci­ences looked at the pos­sib­il­ity of a sol­ar flare and its ef­fects. Its find­ings, while less apo­ca­lyptic than the EMP Co­ali­tion’s warn­ings, were still dire. A sol­ar storm two-thirds the size of the Car­ring­ton Event could still knock out power for 130 mil­lion people. The fal­lout? “[W]ater dis­tri­bu­tion af­fected with­in sev­er­al hours; per­ish­able foods and med­ic­a­tions lost in 12-24 hours; loss of heat­ing/air con­di­tion­ing, sewage dis­pos­al, phone ser­vice, fuel re-sup­ply and so on.”

If we were hit with an­oth­er Car­ring­ton-sized storm, the re­port said, it could take months to get parts of the grid back to func­tion­al. In the first year alone, it would take an eco­nom­ic toll of $2 tril­lion, about 20 times the cost of Hur­ricane Kat­rina.

Ac­cord­ing to Pet­ro­vay, the worst ef­fects of the flare would be felt in North Amer­ica, where the highly-con­nec­ted grid could ex­acer­bate prob­lems and sys­tems run­ning near peak ca­pa­city have less room for er­ror. “I have doubts wheth­er [a sol­ar storm] would really take out the whole grid, but prob­ably shut­downs would oc­cur in many places,” he said.

So how can the U.S. avoid go­ing dark?

Ad­voc­ates say the solu­tion is as simple as surge pro­tect­ors Amer­ic­ans use to pro­tect their per­son­al com­puters — though on a much lar­ger scale.

The co­ali­tion wants such pro­tect­ors placed across the elec­tric­al grid to block harm­ful cur­rents. In ad­di­tion, ad­voc­ates want to pro­tect the ex­tra-high-voltage trans­formers we de­pend on with met­al, cur­rent-ab­sorb­ing boxes called Faraday cages.

And more re­place­ment parts, es­pe­cially the gi­ant trans­formers that can take years to make, need to be at the ready in case we lose crit­ic­al pieces of the grid. That way, even if an EMP dam­aged key in­fra­struc­ture ele­ments, the U.S. would have re­place­ments ready to go.

Without those backups, black­outs could last up to two years, said the Lloyd’s re­port. Pry pegs it some­where between four and 10 years. “That’s op­tim­ist­ic be­cause it as­sumes people would live that long,” he said.

These aren’t new solu­tions. In 2010, the House passed the GRID Act, which would have pro­tec­ted 300 of the coun­try’s biggest trans­formers. The meas­ure died in the Sen­ate later that year.

Last June, Reps. Trent Franks and Yvette Clarke in­tro­duced the SHIELD Act, which man­dates many of the same safe­guards.

When the bill was in­tro­duced, Gin­grich voiced his sup­port, but the House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee has yet to take it up. For that, Pry blames Chair­man Fred Up­ton, who he says is be­hold­en to elec­tri­city util­it­ies that don’t want Con­gress to as­sert reg­u­lat­ory au­thor­ity over the power grid.

Up­ton’s staff re­spon­ded with a state­ment fol­low­ing a Wed­nes­day grid se­cur­ity brief­ing. “We have been act­ive in our over­sight of the na­tion’s en­ergy grid vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies and we re­main vi­gil­ant over all emer­ging threats to the grid, in­clud­ing cy­ber and phys­ic­al at­tacks, sol­ar storms, and elec­tro­mag­net­ic pulses,” Up­ton said.

Ac­cord­ing to the co­ali­tion, pro­tect­ing the elec­tric­al grid would cost only $2 bil­lion, and could be com­pleted in less than five years. Safe­guard­ing all es­sen­tial in­fra­struc­ture would come in between $10-20 bil­lion.

Those who are OK with the status quo, Pry says, are “like the zep­pelin in­dustry in the 1920s.” By his es­tim­ate, util­it­ies could fund grid-pro­tect­ing ef­forts by tack­ing on just 20 cents per year to rate­pay­ers’ bills.

For now, frus­trated with Con­gress, the EMP Co­ali­tion is fo­cus­ing on state-level ef­forts — while still push­ing for ac­tion on the SHIELD Act. Maine’s state gov­ern­ment re­cently passed le­gis­la­tion to pro­tect its power sup­ply from EMPs. “We’ve already made more pro­gress at the state level than in five years of beat­ing our heads against the wall in Wash­ing­ton,” Pry said.

It’s clear the head-banging has got­ten to Pry. At times, the frus­tra­tion and ur­gency in his voice is palp­able. He brings up North Korean nuc­le­ar tests, a sniper at­tack on San Diego trans­formers and mis­siles found last year aboard a North Korean freight­er in the Panama Canal. “All of this looks like pre­par­a­tion for a lar­ger, more co­ordin­ated at­tack,” he said.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4847) }}

What We're Following See More »
‘PULLING A TRUMP’
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
15 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Source:
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
×