Who Gets Sued When Your Robot Car Crashes?

Autonomous vehicles will save thousands of lives. But what about the ones they take?

Robot cars will save lots of lives, but they'll also open up some tricky liability issues?
National Journal
Alex Brown
March 25, 2014, 8:53 a.m.

You are a ter­rible driver.

By hu­man stand­ards, you might be pretty good, but you’ll nev­er be able to match the re­ac­tion time, 360-de­gree mon­it­or­ing, and pres­ci­ent aware­ness autonom­ous vehicles will soon provide.

By al­most any es­tim­ate, tak­ing the wheel out of the hands of hu­man drivers — when the tech­no­logy is ready — will save thou­sands of lives. “Hu­man be­ings just aren’t that great as drivers,” said Rand’s James An­der­son. Driver­less cars “could save bil­lions of dol­lars and thou­sands of lives.”

But what hap­pens when something goes wrong? Ro­bot cars may pre­vent thou­sands of ac­ci­dents, but even­tu­ally, in­ev­it­ably, there will be a crash.

“Who’s re­spons­ible if the car crashes?” Audi’s Brad Stertz said earli­er this year. “That’s go­ing to be an is­sue.”

It’s tough to ar­gue the pas­sen­ger (who may well be the vic­tim) should be held re­spons­ible if a car con­trolled by a com­puter runs it­self off the road. But should auto­makers face long, ex­pens­ive law­suits when life-sav­ing tech­no­logy suf­fers a rare glitch?

“Auto­maker li­ab­il­ity is likely to in­crease. Crashes are much more likely to be viewed as the fault of the car and the man­u­fac­turer,” An­der­son said. “If you’re an auto­maker and you know you’re go­ing to be sued [more fre­quently], you’re go­ing to have re­ser­va­tions.”¦ The leg­al li­ab­il­ity test doesn’t take in­to ac­count the long-run be­ne­fits.”

In oth­er words, even though a tech­no­logy is an over­all boon to the great­er good, its rare in­stances of fail­ure — and sub­sequent law­suits — won’t take that in­to ac­count. That could slow the move­ment of driver­less cars to the mass mar­ket if auto­makers are wary of leg­al battles.

“The auto in­surers are think­ing a lot about this,” An­der­son said. In­surers, as well as body shops and trauma cen­ters, are among the mem­bers of the “crash eco­nomy” that will be dis­rup­ted when ro­bot cars rule the road.

As they grapple with what autonom­ous vehicles might mean for their in­dustry, the leg­al fron­ti­er re­mains un­cer­tain as well. One pos­sible solu­tion? A pay­out fund set up to com­pensate vic­tims of driver­less car ac­ci­dents. That could be modeled sim­il­ar to the Health and Hu­man Ser­vices De­part­ment’s vac­cine in­jury com­pens­a­tion fund, which takes a 75-cent tax from every pur­chased vac­cine. The no-fault pro­gram helps those who have been hurt by vac­cine-re­lated in­cid­ents without ex­pos­ing the med­ic­al com­munity to leg­al battles and ex­pens­ive dam­ages pay­outs.

In the early stages, sub­sidies may be re­quired to help driver­less cars take hold in the mar­ket, ac­cord­ing to Rand’s re­port on the tech­no­logy’s ad­op­tion. Part of the money al­lot­ted for that could be set aside to help po­ten­tial vic­tims.

“The over­all crash costs are go­ing to go down,” An­der­son said. “How do you make sure that the amount that’s saved goes in such a way to en­cour­age ef­fi­cient ad­op­tion? “¦ One of the key is­sues is to make sure that the win­ners com­pensate the losers. Clearly there’s go­ing to be a lot of win­ners. Auto­makers may be in the loser cat­egory if they face in­creas­ing li­ab­il­ity suits. Some form of straight­en­ing that out might make sense.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4821) }}

What We're Following See More »
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
1 days ago

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
1 days ago

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
1 days ago

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
20 hours ago

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.
CNN Calls the Primary for Sanders and Trump
7 hours ago

Well that didn’t take long. CNN has already declared Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump the winners of the New Hampshire primary, leaving the rest of the candidates to fight for the scraps. Five minutes later, the Associated Press echoed CNN’s call.