Who Gets Sued When Your Robot Car Crashes?

Autonomous vehicles will save thousands of lives. But what about the ones they take?

Robot cars will save lots of lives, but they'll also open up some tricky liability issues?
National Journal
Alex Brown
March 25, 2014, 8:53 a.m.

You are a ter­rible driver.

By hu­man stand­ards, you might be pretty good, but you’ll nev­er be able to match the re­ac­tion time, 360-de­gree mon­it­or­ing, and pres­ci­ent aware­ness autonom­ous vehicles will soon provide.

By al­most any es­tim­ate, tak­ing the wheel out of the hands of hu­man drivers — when the tech­no­logy is ready — will save thou­sands of lives. “Hu­man be­ings just aren’t that great as drivers,” said Rand’s James An­der­son. Driver­less cars “could save bil­lions of dol­lars and thou­sands of lives.”

But what hap­pens when something goes wrong? Ro­bot cars may pre­vent thou­sands of ac­ci­dents, but even­tu­ally, in­ev­it­ably, there will be a crash.

“Who’s re­spons­ible if the car crashes?” Audi’s Brad Stertz said earli­er this year. “That’s go­ing to be an is­sue.”

It’s tough to ar­gue the pas­sen­ger (who may well be the vic­tim) should be held re­spons­ible if a car con­trolled by a com­puter runs it­self off the road. But should auto­makers face long, ex­pens­ive law­suits when life-sav­ing tech­no­logy suf­fers a rare glitch?

“Auto­maker li­ab­il­ity is likely to in­crease. Crashes are much more likely to be viewed as the fault of the car and the man­u­fac­turer,” An­der­son said. “If you’re an auto­maker and you know you’re go­ing to be sued [more fre­quently], you’re go­ing to have re­ser­va­tions.”¦ The leg­al li­ab­il­ity test doesn’t take in­to ac­count the long-run be­ne­fits.”

In oth­er words, even though a tech­no­logy is an over­all boon to the great­er good, its rare in­stances of fail­ure — and sub­sequent law­suits — won’t take that in­to ac­count. That could slow the move­ment of driver­less cars to the mass mar­ket if auto­makers are wary of leg­al battles.

“The auto in­surers are think­ing a lot about this,” An­der­son said. In­surers, as well as body shops and trauma cen­ters, are among the mem­bers of the “crash eco­nomy” that will be dis­rup­ted when ro­bot cars rule the road.

As they grapple with what autonom­ous vehicles might mean for their in­dustry, the leg­al fron­ti­er re­mains un­cer­tain as well. One pos­sible solu­tion? A pay­out fund set up to com­pensate vic­tims of driver­less car ac­ci­dents. That could be modeled sim­il­ar to the Health and Hu­man Ser­vices De­part­ment’s vac­cine in­jury com­pens­a­tion fund, which takes a 75-cent tax from every pur­chased vac­cine. The no-fault pro­gram helps those who have been hurt by vac­cine-re­lated in­cid­ents without ex­pos­ing the med­ic­al com­munity to leg­al battles and ex­pens­ive dam­ages pay­outs.

In the early stages, sub­sidies may be re­quired to help driver­less cars take hold in the mar­ket, ac­cord­ing to Rand’s re­port on the tech­no­logy’s ad­op­tion. Part of the money al­lot­ted for that could be set aside to help po­ten­tial vic­tims.

“The over­all crash costs are go­ing to go down,” An­der­son said. “How do you make sure that the amount that’s saved goes in such a way to en­cour­age ef­fi­cient ad­op­tion? “¦ One of the key is­sues is to make sure that the win­ners com­pensate the losers. Clearly there’s go­ing to be a lot of win­ners. Auto­makers may be in the loser cat­egory if they face in­creas­ing li­ab­il­ity suits. Some form of straight­en­ing that out might make sense.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4821) }}

What We're Following See More »
Priebus Asks Party to Unite Behind Trump
7 hours ago
Sanders Upsets Clinton in Indiana
8 hours ago

Despite trailing Hillary Clinton by a significant margin, Bernie Sanders wasn't going the way of Ted Cruz tonight. The Vermont senator upset Clinton in Indiana, with MSNBC calling the race at 9pm. Sanders appears poised to win by a five- or six-point spread.

Ted Cruz Bows Out, Effectively Ceding the Contest to Trump
9 hours ago

And just like that, it's over. Ted Cruz will suspend his presidential campaign after losing badly to Donald Trump in Indiana tonight. "While Cruz had always hedged when asked whether he would quit if he lost Indiana; his campaign had laid a huge bet on the state." John Kasich's campaign has pledged to carry on. “From the beginning, I’ve said that I would continue on as long as there was a viable path to victory,” said Cruz. “Tonight, I’m sorry to say it appears that path has been foreclosed."

Trump Wins Indiana, All but Seals the Nomination
9 hours ago

The Republican establishment's last remaining hope—a contested convention this summer—may have just ended in Indiana, as Donald Trump won a decisive victory over Ted Cruz. Nothing Cruz seemed to have in his corner seemed to help—not a presumptive VP pick in Carly Fiorina, not a midwestern state where he's done well in the past, and not the state's legions of conservatives. Though Trump "won't secure the 1,237 delegates he needs to formally claim the nomination until June, his Indiana triumph makes it almost impossible to stop him. Following his decisive wins in New York and other East Coast states, the Indiana victory could put Trump within 200 delegates of the magic number he needs to clinch the nomination." Cruz, meanwhile, "now faces the agonizing choice of whether to remain in the race, with his attempt to force the party into a contested convention in tatters, or to bow out and cede the party nomination to his political nemesis." The Associated Press, which called the race at 7pm, predicts Trump will win at least 45 delegates.

What’s the Average Household Income of a Trump Voter?
14 hours ago

Seventy-two thousand dollars, according to FiveThirtyEight. That's higher than the national average, as well as the average Clinton or Sanders voter, but lower than the average Kasich voter.