Facing charges that it was trying to control the news media, the Federal Communications Commission has dropped its controversial study of newsrooms.
“The FCC will not move forward with the Critical Information Needs study,” an agency spokesman said Friday. “The Commission will reassess the best way to fulfill its obligation to Congress to identify barriers to entry into the communications marketplace faced by entrepreneurs and other small businesses.”
The FCC first proposed the study last year, saying it would help it gain a better understanding of how TV stations and newspapers provided news to their communities. The agency was scheduled to begin the study with a pilot in Columbia, S.C., this spring.
But the study came under fire from Republicans, who claimed the agency was trying to meddle in the editorial decisions of journalists.
Among other things, the agency planned to ask journalists about their “news philosophy” and “the process by which stories are selected.” The study would have gathered data on “perceived station bias” and “perceived responsiveness to underserved populations.” The FCC also wanted to examine how local TV stations covered “critical information” such as “economic opportunities” and the “environment.”
The issue gained more widespread attention earlier this month when Ajit Pai, a Republican FCC commissioner, wrote a Wall Street Journal op-ed blasting the study. He warned that the agency planned to send “researchers to grill reporters, editors, and station owners about how they decide which stories to run.”
Responding to the questions would have been voluntary, but Pai suggested that TV stations would have felt pressured to participate because they depend on FCC licenses to operate.
The Republican leaders of the House Energy and Commerce Committee were planning a hearing and preparing a bill to “eradicate” the FCC’s study.
In a joint statement Friday, Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton and Communications and Technology Subcomittee Chairman Greg Walden applauded the FCC for dropping the “ill-conceived encroachment into the newsroom.”
“This is a victory for the First Amendment and freedom of the press. But this unprecedented and dangerous intrusion on America’s newsrooms should never have been pursued in the first place.”
A spokesman for the Republican lawmakers did not say whether they would still push ahead with a hearing or legislation.
FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler had tried to distance himself from the study, which was first proposed under his predecessor, acting Chairwoman Mignon Clyburn. Wheeler at first said he would rework the proposal, before deciding to scrap it altogether.
What We're Following See More »
Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."
In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."
President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.
The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"