Pandora Knows How You’ll Vote, and It’s Not Keeping Your Secret

The online music service is telling campaigns what music you listen to, which they say gives away your party affiliation.

Daft Punk arrives at Walt Disney's 'TRON: Legacy' World Premiere held at the El Capitan Theatre on December 11, 2010 in Los Angeles, California.
National Journal
Alex Brown
Feb. 19, 2014, 12:10 a.m.

Sick of cam­paign ads on the ra­dio? Don’t plan on turn­ing to Pan­dora to get a break from this fall’s elec­tion-com­mer­cial frenzy.

The mu­sic stream­ing ser­vice an­nounced last week it is launch­ing tar­geted ad­vert­ising — al­low­ing can­did­ates to reach voters based on age, loc­a­tion, and mu­sic pref­er­ence. Ac­cord­ing to Pan­dora, that in­form­a­tion can tell with 75-80 per­cent ac­cur­acy how a per­son will vote.

“What we’re try­ing to do is make it so that the tar­get­ing that’s se­lec­ted by these cam­paigns is … reach­ing the right groups,” said Pan­dora’s Jack Kraw­czyk. The com­pany’s ad­vert­ising sys­tem weights its res­ults based on users’ ZIP codes; an area that voted 60 per­cent for Obama will have that factored in­to its res­id­ents’ vot­ing prob­ab­il­it­ies.

Then Pan­dora looks at your mu­sic. Listen to a lot of coun­try? You’re prob­ably a strong Re­pub­lic­an voter. Prefer jazz? You likely vote Demo­crat. Clas­sic rock or hip-hop? Well, you’re a little harder to pin down — but that might be just what ad-makers are look­ing for.

Pan­dora is the latest con­tent pro­vider to try to cash in on polit­ic­al op­er­at­ives’ de­sire for pre­ci­sion mes­saging. Dir­ecTV and Dish Net­work are of­fer­ing “ad­dress­able ad­vert­ising” for statewide cam­paigns, al­low­ing can­did­ates to tail­or a mes­sage down to the neigh­bor­hood level.

But just be­cause an al­gorithm thinks it knows how you’ll vote, do you really want to get bom­barded with cam­paign ads for your (prob­able) can­did­ate of choice? Do you lay off the hip-hop so the com­puter doesn’t identi­fy you as a coveted swing voter?

It’s not that Pan­dora hasn’t played host to cam­paign ads be­fore. But the voter tar­get­ing makes it more likely cam­paigns will look to it as a worth­while ad­vert­ising in­vest­ment. The more a cam­paign knows about you, the harder it’s will­ing to work to pur­sue your vote — more know­ledge gives op­er­at­ives a bet­ter idea of where they’re in­vest­ing their money.

So while it might be frus­trat­ing to have your demo­graph­ics put you in a cam­paign’s crosshairs, it’s quite luc­rat­ive for Pan­dora. “The more you re­duce the risk that you’re not hit­ting the right audi­ence, the high­er the will­ing­ness to pay,” Kraw­czyk said.

An­oth­er pos­sib­il­ity — at least ac­cord­ing to one cam­paign op­er­at­ive who has worked with Pan­dora — is rolling out ad cam­paigns when artists en­dorse politi­cians. For ex­ample, in the un­likely event Katy Perry en­dorsed Mitch Mc­Con­nell, you might want to steer clear of her mu­sic un­less you wanted to be bom­barded with his cam­paign ads. You might also find it dif­fi­cult to listen to Clay Aiken without hear­ing ads for, well, Clay Aiken.

No mat­ter how an­noy­ing tar­geted ads get for you, they’re a smarter buy for cam­paigns and money in the pock­ets of con­tent pro­viders. So ex­pect to see more, not less, of them in 2014 and bey­ond.

Still, Kraw­czyk pledged to take user feed­back in­to ac­count as Pan­dora rolls out its cam­paign of­fer­ings. “We’re al­ways mon­it­or­ing the ef­fect of our our ad load,” he said. “If we saw that there’s any­thing that’s driv­ing away listen­ing be­ha­vi­or, then we would cer­tainly act ac­cord­ingly.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4742) }}

What We're Following See More »
BACKING OUT ON BERNIE
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
2 days ago
THE LATEST

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

AKNOWLEDGING THE INEVITABLE
UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Source:
AP KEEPING COUNT
Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Source:
TRUMP FLOATED IDEA ON JIMMY KIMMEL’S SHOW
Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
3 days ago
THE LATEST
CAMPAIGNS INJECTED NEW AD MONEY
California: It’s Not Over Yet
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.

Source:
×