‘House of Cards’ Isn’t the Only Way Netflix Flexes Its Presence on the Hill

A sign is posted in front of the Netflix headquarters on January 22, 2014 in Los Gatos, California. 
National Journal
Elahe Izadi
Feb. 19, 2014, 6:01 a.m.

House of Cards is not the only way Net­flix flexed its pres­ence on Cap­it­ol Hill in 2013. It’s also us­ing money.

The rent­al and stream­ing com­pany rap­idly built up its lob­by­ing ef­forts in 2013. Just four years ago, the com­pany spent $20,000 on lob­by­ing. Last year, it dropped $1.2 mil­lion, ac­cord­ing to data from the Cen­ter for Re­spons­ive Polit­ics. It’s still ranked well be­low many oth­er com­puter and In­ter­net com­pan­ies on lob­by­ing dol­lars, though.

Net­flix is mak­ing money for some law­makers, too. As the Cen­ter for Pub­lic In­teg­rity points out, a hand­ful of mem­bers on the Hill have money in­ves­ted in the com­pany. Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Pat Roberts of Kan­sas owned between $16,002 and $65,000 in com­pany stock, while Demo­crat­ic Sen. Cory Book­er of New Jer­sey owned between $15,001 and $50,000.

The com­pany’s lob­by­ing has fo­cused on net neut­ral­ity, which would keep In­ter­net pro­viders from giv­ing pref­er­en­tial treat­ment or fin­ing sites based on how much band­width they use. Net­flix has a lot to lose or gain in the policy de­bate. At peak times, Net­flix ac­counts for roughly one-third of North Amer­ica band­width.

A Janu­ary fed­er­al-court rul­ing has left the status of net-neut­ral­ity rules in limbo. The White House, for its part, re­af­firmed its sup­port of net neut­ral­ity in re­sponse this week to a white­house.gov pe­ti­tion. And newly pro­posed le­gis­la­tion in Con­gress would tem­por­ar­ily keep the rules in place.

Newly pro­posed bills means a lob­by­ing bon­anza, right? Well, it’s un­clear which tech com­pan­ies will ac­tu­ally throw their weight be­hind the le­gis­la­tion this time around. Google, which has be­come an In­ter­net pro­vider in its own right, isn’t a lock to put its massive sup­port be­hind the latest neut­ral­ity ef­forts. But Net­flix, with all the cash it dropped in 2013, could po­s­i­tion it­self as a ma­jor power play­er.

What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
13 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×