White House Unveils Guidelines to Thwart Hackers

The Obama administration released its cybersecurity framework, but it’s unclear how much good it will do.

A person claiming to speak for activist hacker group Anonymous is seen issuing a warning throught a video circulated online to 'go to war' with the Singapore government over recent Internet licensing rules on November 1, 2013.
National Journal
Brendan Sasso
Feb. 12, 2014, 9 a.m.

The White House on Wed­nes­day is­sued a highly-an­ti­cip­ated set of guidelines to help busi­nesses de­fend them­selves from hack­ers.

Pres­id­ent Obama ordered his ad­min­is­tra­tion to cre­ate the cy­ber­se­cur­ity frame­work last year after con­gres­sion­al Re­pub­lic­ans blocked his pre­ferred le­gis­la­tion. White House of­fi­cials trum­peted the frame­work Wed­nes­day, say­ing it will help up­grade the na­tion’s de­fenses against cy­ber­at­tacks.

But the guidelines are en­tirely vol­un­tary. Without le­gis­la­tion, the ad­min­is­tra­tion can’t force com­pan­ies to fol­low the rules, and it’s un­clear how much the gov­ern­ment can do to en­cour­age com­pli­ance. Of­fi­cials said they won’t even be able to track which com­pan­ies are ad­opt­ing the stand­ards.

“While I be­lieve today’s frame­work marks a turn­ing point, it’s clear that much more work needs to be done to en­hance our cy­ber­se­cur­ity,” Obama said in a state­ment.

“I again urge Con­gress to move for­ward on cy­ber­se­cur­ity le­gis­la­tion that both pro­tects our na­tion and our pri­vacy and civil liber­ties. Mean­while, my ad­min­is­tra­tion will con­tin­ue to take ac­tion, un­der ex­ist­ing au­thor­it­ies, to pro­tect our na­tion from this threat.”

For years, the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion has been warn­ing that cy­ber­at­tacks rep­res­ent one of the gravest threats to na­tion­al se­cur­ity and that many crit­ic­al sys­tems re­main woe­fully un­der­prepared for a soph­ist­ic­ated at­tack.

Hack­ers could de­rail trains, shut­down power grids, cause planes to col­lide, or ru­in the wa­ter sup­ply, of­fi­cials warned in con­gres­sion­al testi­mony, pub­lic speeches, and op-eds.

In 2012, the White House lob­bied Con­gress to pass le­gis­la­tion re­quir­ing crit­ic­al in­fra­struc­ture op­er­at­ors, such as tele­com com­pan­ies, banks, and elec­tric util­it­ies, to meet gov­ern­ment cy­ber­se­cur­ity stand­ards. But Re­pub­lic­ans ar­gued that man­dat­ory reg­u­la­tions would bur­den com­pan­ies and do little to com­bat the con­stantly evolving threat of cy­ber­at­tacks.

Demo­crats scaled back their le­gis­la­tion so that busi­nesses would be pres­sured — but not forced — to fol­low the cy­ber­se­cur­ity stand­ards. But Re­pub­lic­ans still ob­jec­ted and suc­cess­fully fili­bustered the Cy­ber­se­cur­ity Act, which was au­thored by in­de­pend­ent Sen. Joe Lieber­man and Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Susan Collins and backed by most Demo­crats.

Fol­low­ing the de­feat of the bill, Obama signed an ex­ec­ut­ive or­der in­struct­ing the Na­tion­al In­sti­tute of Stand­ards and Tech­no­logy, a Com­merce De­part­ment agency, to work with the private sec­tor to de­vel­op vol­un­tary cy­ber­se­cur­ity guidelines for crit­ic­al in­fra­struc­ture.

The frame­work is a set of broad strategies to help com­pan­ies de­fend their sys­tems and con­tains few spe­cif­ic re­com­mend­a­tions. The doc­u­ment is di­vided in­to five cy­ber­se­cur­ity ac­tions: identi­fy, pro­tect, de­tect, re­spond, and re­cov­er.

Busi­nesses are urged to take steps such as train­ing their em­ploy­ees, cata­loging the soft­ware they use, man­aging re­mote ac­cess to their sys­tems, and back­ing up their data. In the event of an at­tack, they should identi­fy the ma­li­cious com­puter code, share in­form­a­tion with oth­er groups, as­sess the dam­age, and re­store their sys­tems.

The stand­ards are largely based on ex­ist­ing in­dustry best-prac­tices, and of­fi­cials said they plan to keep them up-to-date as threats and se­cur­ity meas­ures evolve. 

The stand­ards can ap­ply to re­tail­ers like Tar­get, which suffered a massive data breach that com­prom­ised mil­lions of cred­it card num­bers late last year.

Al­though the guidelines are vol­un­tary, the White House is ur­ging reg­u­lat­ory agen­cies to up­date their ex­ist­ing reg­u­la­tions to match the frame­work. So the Fed­er­al Com­mu­nic­a­tions Com­mis­sion, which already has broad power over tele­com com­pan­ies, may re­vise cer­tain reg­u­la­tions to more closely align with the guidelines.

The Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment will also de­vel­op a pro­gram to try to in­centiv­ize com­pan­ies to fol­low the rules. Phyl­lis Sch­neck, DHS deputy un­der­sec­ret­ary for cy­ber­se­cur­ity, said Monday morn­ing dur­ing an event at the Cen­ter for Na­tion­al Policy that cy­ber­se­cur­ity in­sur­ance may be avail­able to com­pan­ies that fol­low the guidelines but are breached any­way.

Adam Segal, a cy­ber­se­cur­ity fel­low at the Coun­cil on For­eign Re­la­tions, said the frame­work isn’t a re­place­ment for le­gis­la­tion.

“This is the best we’re go­ing to get right now,” he said. “Giv­en the polit­ic­al con­straints and the real­ity, this is a good first step.”

Busi­ness groups praised the ad­min­is­tra­tion for pur­su­ing vol­un­tary guidelines in­stead of cre­at­ing a new reg­u­lat­ory re­gime.

“They’ve done some really good things here in try­ing to be help­ful and not fo­cus on reg­u­la­tion,” Tom Pat­ter­son, the head of cy­ber­se­cur­ity con­sult­ing for Com­puter Sci­ences Corp., said. “Had it res­ul­ted in a simple check­list, it wouldn’t be nearly as ef­fect­ive as giv­ing real guid­ance.”

Al­though busi­ness groups have fought against any at­tempts for man­dat­ory cy­ber­se­cur­ity reg­u­la­tion, they do want Con­gress to pass le­gis­la­tion al­low­ing great­er in­form­a­tion-shar­ing between com­pan­ies and the gov­ern­ment.

The com­pan­ies want leg­al pro­tec­tion from li­ab­il­ity for in­form­a­tion they share with oth­er com­pan­ies or the gov­ern­ment about at­tacks on their sys­tems. Al­though Obama’s ex­ec­ut­ive or­der en­cour­aged the gov­ern­ment to share more cy­ber­se­cur­ity in­form­a­tion with the private sec­tor, there is little the ad­min­is­tra­tion can do on li­ab­il­ity pro­tec­tion without le­gis­la­tion.

Key law­makers praised the frame­work and re­it­er­ated their sup­port for le­gis­la­tion Wed­nes­day. But Re­pub­lic­an op­pos­i­tion con­tin­ues to mean that man­dat­ory reg­u­la­tions and even gov­ern­ment pres­sure are un­likely to pass Con­gress any time soon.

And the rev­el­a­tions about Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency sur­veil­lance have also heightened fears about the gov­ern­ment’s ac­cess to private data, mean­ing that any cy­ber-in­form­a­tion-shar­ing bills are a longer shot than ever be­fore.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×