America Forgot How to Talk to Its Zombie Spaceship

One of our greatest space explorers is coming home — but we no longer speak its language.

National Journal
Alex Brown
Feb. 12, 2014, midnight

A long-lost, pi­on­eer­ing space­ship — still func­tion­al thanks only to chance and hu­man er­ror — is com­ing home for the first time in three dec­ades. It wants to ex­plore new worlds. But we’ve for­got­ten how to talk to it.

ISEE-3 — short for In­ter­na­tion­al Sun-Earth Ex­plorer — was launched in 1978, ex­ecut­ing a pair of sci­entif­ic mis­sions and a ground­break­ing in-space man­euver that’s still used to this day. “It’s def­in­itely a spe­cial space­craft in the his­tory of plan­et­ary ex­plor­a­tion,” the Plan­et­ary So­ci­ety’s Emily Lak­dawalla said. The satel­lite comes in at just over 850 pounds, but its con­tri­bu­tions to sci­ence have been sig­ni­fic­ant.

As it nears Earth — it will ar­rive in Au­gust — we’ll have our best op­por­tun­ity in 31 years to re­dir­ect it on an­oth­er mis­sion. But that won’t hap­pen. The space­craft was long ago giv­en up for dead, and as a res­ult, the ‘70s-era tech­no­logy we used to talk to it was scrapped. The Deep Space Net­work lost the prop­er trans­mit­ters in 1999.

That should have been the end of the story. When we stopped talk­ing to the ISEE-3, it was sup­posed to stop talk­ing to us. But in 2008, someone re­membered they’d neg­lected to tell the ship to turn off its trans­mit­ters. A quick sig­nal search re­vealed the craft was still in its pre­cise or­bit with 12 of 13 sci­entif­ic in­stru­ments still op­er­a­tion­al.

“Or­din­ar­ily when NASA is done with a mis­sion, they send a com­mand to turn off the trans­mit­ter,” Lak­dawalla said. “This was kind of a mis­take, the fact that this trans­mit­ter is still op­er­at­ing.” More im­press­ive is the fact that its 30-plus-year-old in­stru­ments still seem to be in work­ing or­der. “As far as we know, this thing is work­ing ex­tremely well giv­en its age — and it has a lot of use­ful sci­entif­ic in­stru­ments.” The prob­lem is that we can’t tell ISEE-3 to give us a com­plete pic­ture of its health “be­cause we can’t cur­rently speak its lan­guage.”

If we could talk to ISEE-3, we could use its Earth ap­proach this sum­mer as a jump­ing-off point to send it comet-hunt­ing (it be­came the first space­craft to fly past a comet in 1985). It’s equipped to meas­ure plas­mas, en­er­get­ic particles, waves, and fields.

Some want to crack the his­tory books and fig­ure out how to re­build the trans­mit­ter ne­ces­sary to once again talk to our lonely space­ship. Why waste a re­source that we’ve already put in space? But NASA says that would prove too ex­pens­ive. “They thought it would [cost] so much that it wasn’t worth spend­ing the staff time to get the es­tim­ate,” Lak­dawalla said. “NASA has lim­ited re­sources, and they have to fo­cus on the ones that are pro­du­cing the best sci­ence right now.”

So ISEE-3’s con­tri­bu­tions will be lim­ited to its past. They’re not in­sig­ni­fic­ant.

The ship’s most not­able break­through was us­ing a Lag­rangi­an point to change its tra­ject­ory, a move that had nev­er been done be­fore. What’s a Lag­rangi­an point? Lak­dawalla com­pares it to the mid­point of a dumb­bell, a spot in which grav­it­a­tion­al pull is nearly bal­anced in both dir­ec­tions. Five such loc­a­tions ex­ist in the Earth and sun’s or­bit­al con­fig­ur­a­tion, al­low­ing space­craft to “park” and con­serve en­ergy. ISEE-3 was the first to use L1, or­bit­ing con­tinu­ously between Earth and the sun to mon­it­or sol­ar wind.

In 1982, when ISEE-3 was re­as­signed to comet-hunt­ing duty, it was able to use L1 to eas­ily re­pos­i­tion it­self in­to or­bit around the sun. “If you nav­ig­ate a space­craft to one of those [Lag­rangi­an] points, you get an op­por­tun­ity to change the space­craft’s path a great deal with very little en­ergy,” Lak­dawalla said. “This par­tic­u­lar tech­nique was pi­on­eered by ISEE-3.”

It stud­ied Comet Gi­ac­obini-Zin­ner’s plasma tail in 1985, then joined the “Comet Hal­ley Ar­mada” in 1986 when earth­bound sci­ent­ists be­came fix­ated on the ap­proach­ing comet. It’s re­mained in he­lio­centric or­bit since then, gradu­ally get­ting closer to Earth as it main­tains a slightly faster or­bit. It’s com­pleted 31 or­bits of the sun dur­ing the same time Earth has com­pleted 30.

Come Au­gust, ISEE-3 will fi­nally near its ter­restri­al ori­gins again, caus­ing its or­bit to change — but we won’t be able to tell it where to go next.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×