Rand Paul: Hillary Clinton Is a ‘Big Proponent of the Surveillance State’

A preview of a 2016 campaign argument?

National Journal
Brendan Sasso
Jan. 28, 2014, 8:52 a.m.

Sen. Rand Paul offered a pos­sible pre­view of the 2016 pres­id­en­tial cam­paign Tues­day.

The Ken­tucky Re­pub­lic­an ar­gued that the GOP could win over young voters and in­de­pend­ents by op­pos­ing the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s sur­veil­lance powers, and took a swipe at pos­sible Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate Hil­lary Clin­ton.

“I think in 2016 if you had a more liber­tari­an-lean­ing Re­pub­lic­an, and you had someone like Hil­lary Clin­ton, I think you could ac­tu­ally com­pletely trans­form where people think they are and what party people think they have al­le­gi­ance for,” Paul said at the State of the Net con­fer­ence in Wash­ing­ton.

“Has she said any­thing about pri­vacy? She’s been a big pro­ponent of the sur­veil­lance state and the NSA.”

Paul is widely be­lieved to be mulling a White House bid and Clin­ton, the former sec­ret­ary of State, would be con­sidered the fa­vor­ite to win the Demo­crat­ic nom­in­a­tion if she runs.

Paul’s com­ments ap­pear to rep­res­ent a grow­ing con­sensus with­in the Re­pub­lic­an Party about the NSA. The Re­pub­lic­an Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee ap­proved a res­ol­u­tion last week with near-un­an­im­ous sup­port con­demning the agency’s sur­veil­lance prac­tices. 

In a dis­cus­sion at Col­gate Uni­versity last year, Clin­ton called for a “full, com­pre­hens­ive dis­cus­sion” about the NSA, ac­cord­ing to a Wall Street Journ­al re­port.

But she also de­fen­ded the agency, say­ing, “From my own ex­per­i­ence, the in­form­a­tion-gath­er­ing and ana­lyz­ing has proven very im­port­ant and use­ful in a num­ber of in­stances.”

At Tues­day’s con­fer­ence, Paul said he hopes his law­suit against the NSA, which he has yet to file, will ul­ti­mately reach the Su­preme Court. A fed­er­al judge in Wash­ing­ton ruled last month that the NSA’s bulk col­lec­tion of mil­lions of phone re­cords is un­con­sti­tu­tion­al, but a fed­er­al judge in New York up­held the pro­gram in a sep­ar­ate law­suit. Both cases are be­ing ap­pealed.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4678) }}

What We're Following See More »
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
23 hours ago

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.