Lobbying associations representing the retail and banking industries are pointing fingers over who’s to blame over the breach last month that exposed the credit card numbers of as many as 110 million Target customers.
The National Retail Federation, which represents Target, sent a letter on Tuesday to members of Congress, claiming that banks have failed to upgrade to the most secure technology for processing transactions in the U.S.
“For years, banks have continued to issue fraud-prone magnetic stripe cards to U.S. customers, putting sensitive financial information at risk while simultaneously touting the security benefits of next generation ‘PIN and Chip’ card technology for customers in Europe and dozens of other markets,” Matthew Shaw, CEO of the National Retail Federation, wrote in the letter.
But the banking industry isn’t letting that accusation slide. The Independent Community Bankers of America fired back at the retail group with a statement on Wednesday.
“The NRF should focus its attention on responding to the harm that security breaches at several retailers have done to consumers and their financial institutions rather than hurling false allegations blaming the banking industry for these retail breaches,” Camden Fine, the CEO of the Independent Community Bankers of America, said.
“Retailers and their processors — not banks — are responsible for the systems in their stores that process payment cards.”
Fine said he hopes the massive breaches at Target and Neiman Marcus will spur retailers to adopt better security procedures.
The Target breach was likely the work of a sophisticated ring of hackers, possibly based in Russia, according to a report released last week by the cybersecurity firm iSight, which worked with the Homeland Security Department. The hackers gained access to the credit card numbers by injecting a virus into Target’s card readers, the report found.
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.