Wear Plaid and Hang Out at Coffee Shops? In the Future, Facebook May Know You’re a Hipster.

Artificial intelligence is coming for your social media.

National Journal
Brian Resnick
Dec. 16, 2013, midnight

So you grow some scruff, start wear­ing tight jeans, oc­ca­sion­ally throw on sus­pend­ers, and reg­u­larly don plaid. You start hanging out at that ar­tis­an­al kom­bucha spot down the street — you know, the one with all the wick­er? And then one morn­ing — be­fore you wax that 360-de­gree handle­bar — when you log onto Face­book, you no­tice something dif­fer­ent.

There’s one ad for sock sus­pend­ers, and an­oth­er one for Amish-made beard con­di­tion­er*.

At parties and on the streets, it’s ob­vi­ous — you’re a total hip­ster. And now Face­book knows it too, just by the pho­tos you’ve up­loaded.

While this dysto­pi­an scen­ario is still set in an un­deter­mined fu­ture, the idea that so­cial me­dia can scan your pho­tos for con­tex­tu­al clues about life­style has already been proven. In his lab at Uni­versity of Cali­for­nia San Diego, Serge J. Be­longie and his stu­dents have cre­ated a com­puter al­gorithm that can guess what “urb­an tribe” (i.e., sub­cul­ture) you be­long to.

Hu­mans can do this al­most without think­ing. We hold ste­reo­types of what the word “hip­ster” im­plies, but we know that not one of these vari­ables com­pletely defines the term. A “hip­ster” is the sum of many parts, like a plaid shirt or tight jeans.

This concept — the abil­ity to use con­tex­tu­al clues to define an ob­ject — is what artists and psy­cho­lo­gists call gestalt. But that type of cog­ni­tion is not easy for a com­puter, which op­er­ates on hard rules.

“That’s the theme in my re­search,” Be­longie says. “Whenev­er I stumble across a pat­tern that people can see but is not im­me­di­ately evid­ent from a quant­it­at­ive per­spect­ive, I’d like to probe that to fig­ure out what’s caus­ing that.”

Be­longie and his team com­pile ref­er­ence pho­tos for each urb­an tribe and then “teach” the com­puter to re­cog­nize the pat­terns in col­ors, tex­tures, and geo­met­ric ar­range­ments. The com­puter then “combs through the data­base and looks for ex­cep­tion­al ex­amples of each of those cat­egor­ies.” In oth­er words, Be­longie is try­ing to teach the com­puter the gestalt it needs to nav­ig­ate a high school cafet­er­ia.

Once the com­puter gets a feel for these pat­terns, it can start guess­ing. Be­longie’s pro­gram isn’t per­fect. The ma­chine op­er­ates at just 39 per­cent bet­ter than chance, Be­longie says. “This is something that we’re just crack­ing open a new re­search area.”

A Seis­mic Shift

Be­longie’s work goes bey­ond hip­sters and goths. This was just an off­shoot of his more sober work — teach­ing com­puters to re­cog­nize can­cer in a biopsy slide or dead cor­al from satel­lite pho­tos.

And yet, he says his re­search can’t ig­nore the pull of so­cial me­dia. “In the old days,” he says, “It was NSF and NIH and DARPA grants — that’s what was kept this field rolling.” But now com­pan­ies like Face­book and Google are in­vest­ing heav­ily in ar­ti­fi­cial in­tel­li­gence, and pick­ing off his stu­dents when they gradu­ate.

The de­fin­ing story of the dec­ade con­tin­ues to be the ap­plic­a­tions of big data. Yes, the Snowden leaks were the biggest story of the year, but they speak to the lar­ger trend of what huge in­sti­tu­tions, such as the U.S. gov­ern­ment, can do when they can pro­cess tera­bytes of data quickly in­to us­able in­form­a­tion. But here’s where that story is start­ing to shift. Big data is go­ing to gain (great­er) con­scious­ness. Or at least that’s where the re­search money is head­ing.

Just re­cently, Face­book an­nounced it is open­ing a gi­ant ar­ti­fi­cial in­tel­li­gence lab to be pi­loted by Yann LeCun, a re­search­er in the field from New York Uni­versity. “The set of tech­no­lo­gies that we’ll be work­ing on is es­sen­tially any­thing that can make ma­chines more in­tel­li­gent,” LeCun tells WIRED about the ini­ti­at­ive.

Google, too, re­cently hired Ray Kur­z­weil, a fu­tur­ist who has pre­dicted that com­puter in­tel­li­gence will ex­ceed hu­man in­tel­li­gence by 2045, to work on ma­chine learn­ing pro­jects. “I en­vi­sion, some years from now, that the ma­jor­ity of search quer­ies will be answered without you ac­tu­ally ask­ing,” he told Sin­gu­lar­ity Hub after he was hired. “It’ll just know this is something that you’re go­ing to want to see.”

Which is kind of creepy, right?

Let’s put it in­to this con­text: Cur­rently Face­book does a lot with its user data, such as run­ning mass so­cial ex­per­i­ments on Elec­tion Day, and re­search­ing at which rates wo­men take the names of their hus­bands when they get mar­ried (the so­cial net­work makes all these stud­ies pub­lic). But if that’s creepy, what’s to come is still creepi­er.

“There is a huge, seis­mic shift that is hap­pen­ing, that every com­pany wants ar­ti­fi­cial in­tel­li­gence in some way,” Be­longie ex­plains. “They are just drown­ing in big data.”

And an enorm­ous amount of that data is in im­age form, which up to now, hasn’t fed back mean­ing­ful in­form­a­tion about users. “These im­ages are just sit­ting in these serv­ers like dark mat­ter,” he says.

Be­longie says it’s part of the “nat­ur­al pro­gres­sion,” that these com­pan­ies will use pro­grams like his own “for good or for ill — but most likely just to serve up more rel­ev­ant ads.”

I asked Be­longie if he thought his own work was “creepy.”

“I’ve lost my ob­jectiv­ity,” he laughs, “be­cause I find these prob­lems so in­ter­est­ing from a sci­entif­ic per­spect­ive. I don’t find it creepy, but I think people need to be aware of what they are shar­ing.”

*Ed­it­or’s Note: A won­der­ful product.

COR­REC­TION: This art­icle orig­nally un­der­stated the ac­cur­acy of the Urb­an Tribe pro­gram. The sys­tem guesses cor­rectly 48 per­cent of the time.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
23 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×