Major tech companies are putting aside their differences to join forces to call for limits on the U.S. government’s surveillance program, reports the The New York Times.
Eight companies — led by Google and Microsoft — escalated their opposition to the government surveillance program with a formal, 5-point plan to restrict the NSA’s spying practices Monday in full-page advertisements in several U.S. newspapers and a website, ReformGovernmentSurveillance.com.
“We understand that governments have a duty to protect their citizens,” their joint statement said. “But this summer’s revelations highlighted the urgent need to reform government surveillance practices worldwide.”
The tech companies’ united front is the latest — and most coordinated — effort in their push to curb the data-surveillance program, and it comes after many companies have vocally opposed the NSA program and stepped up data encryption to protect users’ privacy.
AOL, Apple, Facebook, Google, LinkedIn, Microsoft, Twitter, and Yahoo are all formidable lobbying forces in Washington, and it is in their economic and business interest to push for limits on the government surveillance program. Their complicity in the spying program — revealed through documents leaked by Edward Snowden — have damaged users’ trust in these companies’ ability to protect their data, the currency exchanged between Internet companies and users.
“People won’t use technology they don’t trust,” Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith said in a statement. “Governments have put this trust at risk, and governments need to help restore it.”
The Obama administration will present a review of NSA procedures as soon as this week.
What We're Following See More »
In light of his recent confessions, the speakership of Dennis Hastert is being judged far more harshly. The New York Times' Carl Hulse notes that in hindsight, Hastert now "fares poorly" on a number of fronts, from his handling of the Mark Foley page scandal to "an explosion" of earmarks to the weakening of committee chairmen. "Even his namesake Hastert rule—the informal standard that no legislation should be brought to a vote without the support of a majority of the majority — has come to be seen as a structural barrier to compromise."
Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."
Rep. Dave Young can't even refuse his own paycheck. The Iowa Republican is trying to make a point that if Congress can't pass a budget (it's already missed the April 15 deadline) then it shouldn't be paid. But, he's been informed, the 27th Amendment prohibits him from refusing his own pay. "Young’s efforts to dock his own pay, however, are duck soup compared to his larger goal: docking the pay of every lawmaker when Congress drops the budget ball." His bill to stiff his colleagues has only mustered the support of three of them. Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN), has about three dozen co-sponsors.
Sixty miles away, in Sandusky, Ohio. "We're pretty bitter about that," said Harmeet Dhillon, vice chairwoman of the California Republican Party. "It sucks to be California, we're like the ugly stepchild. They need us for our cash and our donors, they don't need us for anything else."