Immigration

Opinion: In 40 Years, Who Will Fight America’s Wars?

Sept. 18, 2012, 10:10 a.m.

As we de­bate the great is­sues fa­cing the United States, a single pro­voc­at­ive ques­tion stands out: “Who will fight Amer­ica’s wars?”

The na­tion is ex­per­i­en­cing dra­mat­ic demo­graph­ic changes that will sig­ni­fic­antly al­ter how it looks and acts in the com­ing years. There is a great deal of spec­u­la­tion about the aging of Amer­ica’s pop­u­la­tion, its grow­ing di­versity, and the so­cial, polit­ic­al, eco­nom­ic, and cul­tur­al im­plic­a­tions there­of.

But an­oth­er is­sue, the pro­ver­bi­al ele­phant in the room, awaits us: Who will fight Amer­ica’s wars dur­ing the demo­graph­ic trans­ition? Or, put less dra­mat­ic­ally, who will sat­is­fy the man­power needs of an all-vo­lun­teer mil­it­ary when the U.S. be­comes a ma­jor­ity-minor­ity na­tion and the (primar­ily white) eld­erly make up 20 to 25 per­cent of the over­all pop­u­la­tion?

We live in an age of on­go­ing con­flicts. The U.S. must main­tain a will­ing and qual­i­fied pool of young re­cruits for its armed forces. But who will make up that pool?

The ques­tion takes on ad­ded ur­gency in an aging so­ci­ety where whites be­come the minor­ity and fer­til­ity levels of non-His­pan­ic white fe­males fall be­low re­place­ment levels.

By 2050, minor­it­ies and im­mig­rants will form the ma­jor­ity demo­graph­ic and His­pan­ics will ac­count for a third of the U.S. pop­u­la­tion. This pro­file mil­it­ates for in­creased en­list­ment of His­pan­ics, im­mig­rants, and oth­er minor­it­ies.

His­tory shows that blacks en­lis­ted at rates above their per­cent­age of the pop­u­la­tion dur­ing the 1970s and 1980s. His­pan­ics have en­lis­ted at rates above their pro­por­tion re­cently. More re­cently, though, their num­bers ap­pear to have de­clined. Why? Per­haps per­ceived op­por­tun­it­ies in ci­vil­ian life, more strin­gent cri­ter­ia for en­list­ment, re­duced force size, or shift­ing pub­lic opin­ions about cur­rent con­flicts.

Re­gard­less, we can safely as­sume that as a ma­jor­ity-minor­ity na­tion, the U.S. will need to in­crease en­list­ments by His­pan­ics, blacks, Asi­ans, and im­mig­rant groups.

But will His­pan­ics, blacks, and im­mig­rants have suf­fi­cient edu­ca­tion, health status, and early-child­hood de­vel­op­ment sup­port to meet stand­ards re­quired by the mil­it­ary?

The evid­ence is troub­ling. The state of pub­lic edu­ca­tion, es­pe­cially in low-in­come areas, is dis­mal. Blacks and His­pan­ics have the highest rates of health prob­lems, in­clud­ing in­creas­ing rates of dia­betes and obesity (a lead­ing cause of en­list­ment re­jec­tion). We must also look at in­duce­ments that will en­cour­age these pop­u­la­tions to over­come obstacles and to vo­lun­teer in the na­tion’s mil­it­ary.

One sub­stant­ive step could be taken today: Passing the Dream Act and en­act­ing com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion re­form. The De­vel­op­ment, Re­lief, and Edu­ca­tion Act for Ali­en Minors would lay the path for eli­gible youth to be­come leg­al Amer­ic­an cit­izens if they pur­sue post­sec­ond­ary edu­ca­tion or ser­vice in the U.S. mil­it­ary.

Done prop­erly, the act would cre­ate a grow­ing pool of mo­tiv­ated and qual­i­fied po­ten­tial re­cruits. Com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion re­form would provide a path to cit­izen­ship and the po­ten­tial for mil­lions of young-tax­pay­er dol­lars (and rev­en­ues to sus­tain Medi­care and So­cial Se­cur­ity).

As we de­bate the great is­sues fa­cing the next Amer­ica, the in­sist­ent ques­tion of “who will fight Amer­ica’s wars” goes to the heart of a vis­cer­al con­cern: At what point will an older and more di­verse Amer­ica re­cog­nize the need to in­vest in minor­it­ies, im­mig­rants, and His­pan­ics in or­der to sus­tain our na­tion­al se­cur­ity?

Fernando Torres-Gil is a pro­fess­or at the Uni­versity of Cali­for­nia (Los Angeles) and the dir­ect­or for the UCLA Cen­ter for Policy Re­search on Aging.

Kim­berly Suarez Spen­cer, MSW, is a doc­tor­al stu­dent at the Columbia Uni­versity School of So­cial Work.

What We're Following See More »
BUT NOT SUBMITTED THEM
Trump Says He's Completed Answers to Mueller's Questions
1 days ago
THE LATEST
BUT DESANTIS APPEARS TO HAVE LOCKED UP GOVERNOR'S RACE
Florida Senate Race Heads to Hand Recount
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"Following a five-day machine recount of the more than 8.3 million votes cast in the Nov. 6 election, Secretary of State Ken Detzner ordered hand recounts Thursday afternoon in the U.S. Senate race between incumbent Bill Nelson and Gov. Rick Scott." Meanwhile, the "race for governor, which also went through a machine recount, was outside the margins that trigger a manual recount as new tallies came in, making Republican former congressman Ron DeSantis the governor-elect a full nine days after Democrat Andrew Gillum first conceded."

Source:
ORANGE COUNTY IS NOW TOTALLY BLUE
Mimi Walters Is the Latest GOP Incumbent to Go Down
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"In another blow to California Republicans reeling from defeats in the Nov. 6 election, Democrat Katie Porter has ousted GOP Rep. Mimi Walters in an upscale Orange County congressional district that was a longtime conservative bastion." Every district within the county is now held by a Democrat.

Source:
POLIQUIN STILL CHALLENGING RANKED-CHOICE VOTING
Poliquin Loses in Maine's 2nd District
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Democrat Jared Golden has defeated Maine Rep. Bruce Poliquin in the nation’s first use of ranked-choice voting for a congressional race, according to state election officials. The Democrat won just over 50 percent of the vote in round one of ranked-choice voting, meaning he’ll be the next congressman from the 2nd District unless Poliquin’s legal challenges to the voting system prevail. A Golden win in the 2nd District, which President Donald Trump carried in 2016, mean Democrats have picked up 35 seats in the House."

Source:
IF SHE AGREES TO RULES REFORMS
Republicans Could Back Pelosi in Speaker Vote
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Rep. Tom Reed (R-N.Y.) said he and some other Republicans are committed to backing Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) for Speaker if she agrees to enact a package of rule reforms. Reed, co-chair of the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus, said the growing frustration with gridlock, polarization and a top-heavy leadership approach in Congress are the reasons why several members in his party are willing to supply Pelosi with some Speaker votes in exchange for extracting an overhaul of the House rules." The caucus wants to fast-track any legislation with support of two-thirds of members, and require a supermajority to pass any legislation brought up under a closed rule.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login