Against the Grain

Donald Trump’s Huge Debate Blunder

By embracing lower wages, Trump risks losing some support from his rock-solid working-class base.

Donald Trump speaks during the Republican presidential debate in Milwaukee, November 11, 2015.
AP Photo/Morry Gash
Josh Kraushaar
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Josh Kraushaar
Nov. 11, 2015, 9:45 a.m.

One of the most over­looked mo­ments in Tues­day night’s Re­pub­lic­an de­bate came at the very be­gin­ning. Don­ald Trump, asked wheth­er he’d sup­port a hike in the min­im­um wage, in­stead di­gressed in­to say­ing, “Wages [are] too high,” in mak­ing the case for cor­por­ate com­pet­it­ive­ness. And he re­peated the same keep-wages-low talk­ing point Wed­nes­day morn­ing on Morn­ing Joe, ap­par­ently not re­cog­niz­ing the po­ten­tial back­lash he cre­ated. Even though he was an­swer­ing a ques­tion about the min­im­um wage, his re­marks (in both cases) soun­ded like he was talk­ing broadly about the eco­nomy.

Trump, for those not pay­ing at­ten­tion, has been ad­van­cing a cam­paign mes­sage that he’s a trait­or to his class. One of his most ef­fect­ive lines is that he knows that politi­cians are con­trolled by wealthy donors be­cause he was once one of those wealthy donors. He sup­ports tax hikes on the most wealthy and ar­gues, “The hedge fund guys have been get­ting away with murder.” He has been an out­spoken crit­ic of free-trade deals and prom­ises to act tough­er with China (on “steal­ing” Amer­ic­an jobs) and Mex­ico (over im­mig­ra­tion), fur­ther es­tab­lish­ing his pop­u­list bona fides. His cent­ral ap­peal is that he’s prom­ising to bring the skills that made him wealthy to en­rich the broad­er pub­lic.

Which is why Trump’s flub could be so con­sequen­tial. Trump’s polit­ic­al base is dom­in­ated by work­ing-class voters who have been dev­ast­ated by the re­ces­sion and sub­sequent slow re­cov­ery. Many of them are drawn to Trump be­cause they be­lieve his tough per­sona and ne­go­ti­at­ing prowess will re­verse Amer­ica’s eco­nom­ic de­cline—and with it, raise their own wages. Trump is run­ning against the Wall Street wing of the Re­pub­lic­an Party, but with his af­fin­ity for low cor­por­ate wages, he pit­ted him­self against many of the pop­u­lists he’s woo­ing.

“If you find some­body who can move the Trump im­age, from bil­lion­aire mogul with swag­ger and morph him in­to a heart­less CEO jerk, this is a dif­fer­ent race,” said Re­pub­lic­an me­dia con­sult­ant Rick Wilson. “But are his voters go­ing to be more re­cept­ive to his ar­gu­ment on im­mig­ra­tion than they are on wages. That’s the big ques­tion.”

It’s very pos­sible that, like many oth­er Trump com­ments that are ini­tially seen as dam­aging gaffes, this latest off-mes­sage com­ment will do him little dam­age. Re­cent polls have shown Trump’s sup­port­ers as more loy­al to their can­did­ate than those of oth­er can­did­ates. But what makes this line dif­fer­ent is it goes against his own sup­port­ers’ in­terests. They may not care if Trump is rude to Me­gyn Kelly, or mocks John Mc­Cain’s mil­it­ary ser­vice, but when his com­ments dir­ectly im­pact their own bot­tom line, the re­ac­tion could be dif­fer­ent.

One de­fin­ing fea­ture of the Re­pub­lic­an pres­id­en­tial primary so far is that many Re­pub­lic­ans have been hes­it­ant to go after Trump, fear­ing the back­lash they’ll in­ev­it­ably get by tak­ing on a can­did­ate who lashes out against any­one who goes after him. But he just gif­ted a sound bite for an en­ter­pris­ing Re­pub­lic­an chal­lenger to use against him—and cut in­to his over­whelm­ing sup­port among blue-col­lar voters.

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
13 hours ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
16 hours ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
18 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
2 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login