Netanyahu Attempts to Patch Rifts With Progressives

After the Iran deal, the Israeil leader tries to stress shared values with the Left at the Center for American Progress.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks at the Center for American Progress in Washington on Tuesday.
AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais
Nov. 10, 2015, 7:49 p.m.

With the Ir­an nuc­le­ar agree­ment es­sen­tially a done deal, Is­raeli Prime Min­is­ter Ben­jamin Net­an­yahu came to the United States—and the Cen­ter for Amer­ic­an Pro­gress—hop­ing to re­pair re­la­tion­ships with Demo­crats and lib­er­als.

As part of a Wash­ing­ton jaunt that also in­cluded meet­ing with Pres­id­ent Obama, with whom he has had a tense re­la­tion­ship, Net­an­yahu earned some pos­it­ive feed­back at the de­cidedly left-wing think tank.

“While we have dis­agreed on some is­sues, in­clud­ing the Ir­an nuc­le­ar deal,” said Cen­ter for Amer­ic­an Pro­gress Pres­id­ent Neera Tanden, “we also be­lieve deeply that the U.S.-Is­rael re­la­tion­ship is vi­tal.”

Net­an­yahu ac­know­ledged the dis­agree­ment over Ir­an but also said he and the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion have no dis­agree­ment about the fu­ture, in­clud­ing “hold­ing Ir­an’s feet to the fire” by mak­ing sure the coun­try lives up to its ob­lig­a­tions.

“His only com­ments on Ir­an were pos­it­ive,” Greg Rosen­baum, chair­man of the Na­tion­al Jew­ish Demo­crat­ic Coun­cil, told the press af­ter­wards. “He didn’t threaten to do everything to un­der­mine the deal.”

When asked by Tanden about the fu­ture of Is­rael and wheth­er it would con­tin­ue to con­trol Ga­za and oc­cupy the West Bank, Net­an­yahu stressed the need for a Palestini­an state that is not com­mit­ted to Is­rael’s de­struc­tion and that there be an Is­raeli se­cur­ity pres­ence in case a Palestini­an state is taken over by ex­trem­ists.

The White House has seemed to ac­know­ledge that peace pro­spects are dim for Obama’s term in of­fice. Last week, an ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cial said the White House re­cog­nized that the pro­spect for two-state solu­tion is “not in the cards in the time that’s re­main­ing.”

Dan Sha­piro, U.S. am­bas­sad­or to Is­rael, who at­ten­ded the Net­an­yahu event, said the ad­min­is­tra­tion will con­tin­ue to ad­voc­ate for a two-state solu­tion.

“But we re­cog­nize that it may be dif­fi­cult to achieve in the near term,” Sha­piro told Na­tion­al Journ­al. “There­fore, we look to all parties—Is­rael­is, Palestini­ans, and oth­ers—to take steps on the ground that can at least point in the dir­ec­tion of that trans­ition.”  

All of the sen­at­ors who sup­por­ted the Ir­an nuc­le­ar deal were Demo­crats, and a num­ber of Demo­crat­ic law­makers—angered that then-House Speak­er John Boehner had in­vited Net­an­yahu to make a joint ad­dress to Con­gress without con­sult­ing with the White House— skipped his speech earli­er this year.

Still, Net­an­yahu stressed Tues­day that he wanted sup­port for Is­rael to be a sen­ti­ment that tran­scends par­tis­an­ship in the U.S.

“I think it is vi­tal for me that Is­rael re­main an is­sue of bi­par­tis­an con­sensus,” he said in his open­ing state­ments. When he could, Net­an­yahu at­temp­ted to high­light areas where pro­gress­ives might ap­plaud Is­rael, such as wo­men’s rights and gay rights, and con­tras­ted that with Ir­an’s treat­ment of LGBT people.

Matt Duss, pres­id­ent of the Found­a­tion for Middle East Peace, who was once a policy ana­lyst at CAP, said it is clear what Net­an­yahu’s goal was in ad­dress­ing the or­gan­iz­a­tion.

“It’s to kind of demon­strate to Is­raeli voters that, des­pite the fact that he had been work­ing against Pres­id­ent Obama’s agenda quite openly and that he had been cri­ti­cized for un­der­min­ing the U.S.-Is­rael re­la­tion­ship, this is his way of show­ing that it’s all fine,” Duss told Na­tion­al Journ­al be­fore the event.

Former Obama ad­viser Dav­id Axel­rod, who also at­ten­ded, praised Net­an­yahu for speak­ing to the or­gan­iz­a­tion.

“The fact is there’s al­ways been a broad Amer­ic­an con­sensus and sup­port for Is­rael,” Axel­rod told Na­tion­al Journ­al. “I don’t think con­cerns are re­solved in one vis­it, but I strongly dis­agree with the no­tion that there shouldn’t be dia­logue.”

What We're Following See More »
OVER SEXUAL HARASSMENT ALLEGATIONS
House Ethics Committee Sanctions Meadows, Kihuen
6 hours ago
THE LATEST

The House Ethics Committee has formally sanctioned Reps. Mark Meadows and Ruben Kihuen over sexual harassment-related allegations. "Meadows was found to have violated House rules 'by failing to take appropriate steps to ensure that his House office was free from discrimination and any perception of discrimination.'" Meadows will have to pay over $40,000 to cover the cost of former chief of staff Kenny West's salary, who remained on his payroll even after Meadows' learned "of credible harassment allegations against the former aide. ... Kihuen, who announced his retirement as the #MeToo movement swept Capitol Hill last year, was found to have 'made persistent and unwanted advances towards women who were required to interact with him as part of their professional responsibilities.'"

Source:
EX-COAL LOBBYIST, FORMER #2
Trump To Nominate Andrew Wheeler To Lead EPA
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"President Trump said he plans to nominate Andrew Wheeler, acting head of the Environmental Protection Agency, to be the EPA's Senate-confirmed administrator." Wheeler took over as acting administrator in July, "when then-EPA chief Scott Pruitt resigned amid numerous spending and ethics scandals. ... Before working for the government, Wheeler was a lobbyist and lawyer for energy companies such as coal mining giant Murray Energy Corp."

Source:
BUT NOT SUBMITTED THEM
Trump Says He's Completed Answers to Mueller's Questions
8 hours ago
THE LATEST
CORNYN, GRAHAM NEXT IN LINE
Grassley Will Chair Judiciary Committee, Leave Finance
10 hours ago
THE LATEST
RULES NOW ENTER PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
DeVos Overhauls Guidance to Colleges on Sex Misconduct Cases
11 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos has updated the Obama administration's controversial rules on how colleges handle claims of sexual misconduct by students under Title IX. "The proposed new rules aim to significantly enhance legal protections for the accused, and reflect a sentiment expressed personally by President Trump that men are being unfairly presumed guilty." The rules, which must undergo a public comment period, would allow schools to elevate the burden of proof in sex cases to "clear and convincing evidence." They would also permit cross-examination, and lift time limits on investigations.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login