Fate of Defense Authorization Bill Looks Favorable Second Time Around

The Senate overwhelmingly passed the NDAA, sending it to Obama’s desk, where he’s expected to sign it into law.

U.S. Marines and their Philippine counterparts after taking part in an amphibious-landing exercise at a nine-day joint U.S. and Philippine military exercise, dubbed PHIBLEX, northwest of Manila, Philippines, October 9, 2015.
AP Photo/Bullit Marquez
Molly O'Toole, Defense One
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Molly O'Toole, Defense One
Nov. 10, 2015, 1:02 p.m.

Hav­ing re­solved a budget im­passe over de­fense spend­ing, the Sen­ate passed the $607 bil­lion an­nu­al de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill 91-to-three on Tues­day. It soon heads to Pres­id­ent Obama’s desk, where he’s ex­pec­ted to sign it, des­pite earli­er veto threats.

“For 53 con­sec­ut­ive years, Con­gress has passed the NDAA, … but per­haps at no time in our na­tion’s his­tory has this le­gis­la­tion been more crit­ic­al,” Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee Chair­man Sen. John Mc­Cain said on the floor ahead of the vote, not­ing se­cur­ity crises from the South China Sea to the re­por­ted down­ing of a Rus­si­an jet­liner by a ter­ror­ist act. “As our cit­izenry and voters are deeply frus­trated about our in­ab­il­ity to get any­thing done here, I would just point out that our highest pri­or­ity and re­spons­ib­il­ity is de­fend­ing the na­tion.”

Obama ve­toed the NDAA for the first time on Oc­to­ber 22, primar­ily be­cause law­makers cir­cum­ven­ted budget caps to boost de­fense spend­ing through the Pentagon’s war chest, known as the over­seas con­tin­gency op­er­a­tions fund. But House and Sen­ate lead­er­ship worked out a two-year agree­ment to lift the caps, which Obama signed in­to law on Novem­ber 2, clear­ing the way for the fisc­al 2016 NDAA.

After find­ing $5 bil­lion in cuts to bring the NDAA in line with the budget deal, the House re­in­tro­duced the bill with no oth­er changes and passed it Thursday by a vote of 370-to-58.

On Tues­day, only Demo­crat­ic Sens. Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley, and in­de­pend­ent Bernie Sanders, former chair­man of the Sen­ate Vet­er­ans’ Af­fairs Com­mit­tee and cur­rent pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate, voted against the meas­ure. All of the can­did­ates on the Re­pub­lic­an side—Sens. Lind­sey Gra­ham, Marco Ru­bio, Ted Cruz, and Rand Paul—did not vote. (The GOP holds it next pres­id­en­tial de­bate Tues­day night.)  

Still, Obama also cited re­stric­tions on Guantanamo as part of his reas­on­ing for veto­ing the ini­tial NDAA. Last week, the White House wouldn’t rule out a second veto over the stric­tures, which would ef­fect­ively put a le­gis­lat­ive freeze on the pres­id­ent’s ef­forts to close the mil­it­ary pris­on in Cuba, but law­makers made clear to De­fense One they wouldn’t be chan­ging the policy lan­guage.

In the end, the pres­id­ent is ex­pec­ted to sign the NDAA, lock­ing those obstacles in­to law.

Con­gress has passed the “must-pass,” be­hemoth bill for 53 con­sec­ut­ive years. Re­pub­lic­an crit­ics used the pres­id­ent’s veto to ac­cuse him of be­ing will­ing to “hold our troops and their fam­il­ies ransom” for polit­ic­al reas­ons des­pite a tu­mul­tu­ous­ness glob­al-se­cur­ity en­vir­on­ment. That claim packs less polit­ic­al punch giv­en that this is likely the last NDAA Obama will con­sider be­fore the 2016 pres­id­en­tial elec­tion.

Obama has op­posed Guantanamo re­stric­tions in the bill every oth­er year of his ad­min­is­tra­tion and still signed it in­to law. This year also rep­res­ents something of an olive branch to law­makers as the ad­min­is­tra­tion pre­pares to sub­mit to Con­gress later this week a plan to close Guantanamo.

There’s little ap­pet­ite for the plan on Cap­it­ol Hill, but the White House says it re­mains hope­ful it can work with law­makers to lift the re­stric­tions.

Or, at least, ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials aren’t yet pub­licly ac­know­ledging they’ve ex­hausted all their op­tions ahead of ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tion.

On Monday, White House spokes­man Josh Earn­est was asked if the ad­min­is­tra­tion is con­cerned it is too late for the plan, giv­en the NDAA has ad­vanced. “The sense is that we’re go­ing to need some co­oper­a­tion from Con­gress in or­der to ad­vance this pri­or­ity,” he re­spon­ded. “And that would be true wheth­er or not the NDAA had passed or not. So no, it’s not too late.”

But ac­know­ledging that the NDAA sets policy in­to 2017, Earn­est said the pres­id­ent wouldn’t be sat­is­fied leav­ing of­fice hav­ing simply sched­uled Guantanamo for shut­down.

“His goal is to have it closed on his watch as he prom­ised,” he said. “That’s been our goal since I think the pres­id­ent’s second full day in of­fice. It con­tin­ues to be our goal today.”

What We're Following See More »
White House Adds Five New SCOTUS Candidates
5 hours ago

President Trump added five new names to his Supreme Court short list on Friday, should a need arise to appoint a new justice. The list now numbers 25 individuals. They are: 7th Circuit Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, Georgia Supreme Court Justice Britt C. Grant, District of Columbia Circuit Appeals Court Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, 11th Circuit Appeals Judge Kevin C. Newsom, and Oklahoma Supreme Court Justice Patrick Wyrick.

Sessions: DOJ Will No Longer Issue Guidance Documents
5 hours ago

"Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced Friday the Justice Department will revamp its policy for issuing guidance documents. Speaking at the Federalist Society’s annual conference in Washington Friday, Sessions said the Justice Department will no longer issue guidance that 'purports to impose new obligations on any party outside the executive branch.' He said DOJ will review and repeal any documents that could violate this policy." Sessions said: “Too often, rather than going through the long, slow, regulatory process provided in statute, agencies make new rules through guidance documents—by simply sending a letter. This cuts off the public from the regulatory process by skipping the required public hearings and comment periods—and it is simply not what these documents are for. Guidance documents should be used to explain existing law—not to change it.”

Trump to Begin Covering His Own Legal Bills
7 hours ago
Steele Says Follow the Money
8 hours ago

"Christopher Steele, the former British intelligence officer who wrote the explosive dossier alleging ties between Donald Trump and Russia," says in a new book by The Guardian's Luke Harding that "Trump's land and hotel deals with Russians needed to be examined. ... Steele did not go into further detail, Harding said, but seemed to be referring to a 2008 home sale to the Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev. Richard Dearlove, who headed the UK foreign-intelligence unit MI6 between 1999 and 2004, said in April that Trump borrowed money from Russia for his business during the 2008 financial crisis."

Goldstone Ready to Meet with Mueller’s Team
8 hours ago

"The British publicist who helped set up the fateful meeting between Donald Trump Jr. and a group of Russians at Trump Tower in June 2016 is ready to meet with Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller's office, according to several people familiar with the matter. Rob Goldstone has been living in Bangkok, Thailand, but has been communicating with Mueller's office through his lawyer, said a source close to Goldstone."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.