Gillibrand, McCaskill Hope to Derail Greek-Backed Campus-Sexual-Assault Bill

The two Democrats want to convince national sorority groups not to support the controversial legislation.

Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand and Claire McCaskill, along with Anna, a survivor of sexual assault, and her mother, Susan, at a news conference in July to discuss the Campus Accountability and Safety Act.
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
Sarah Mimms
Add to Briefcase
Sarah Mimms
Nov. 4, 2015, 8 p.m.

Sens. Kirsten Gil­librand and Claire Mc­Caskill will sit down Thursday with the lead­ers of na­tion­al fra­tern­it­ies and sor­or­it­ies, hop­ing to earn al­lies and to kill le­gis­la­tion sponsored by the Greek groups to com­bat cam­pus sexu­al as­saults—a bill that, the sen­at­ors say, would ac­tu­ally be harm­ful to vic­tims.

The Safe Cam­pus Act, writ­ten by Re­pub­lic­an Reps. Matt Sal­mon and Pete Ses­sions, would re­quire vic­tims of sexu­al as­sault on col­lege cam­puses to re­port their at­tack­ers to the po­lice. It also al­lows schools to in­crease their stand­ar­ds of evid­en­ce for sexu­al-as­sault cases. The bill is backed by the na­tion’s ma­jor fra­tern­ity and sor­or­ity or­gan­iz­a­tions, who hired a lob­by­ing team, in­clud­ing former Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Trent Lott, to sup­port the bill just last month.

But the le­gis­la­tion is op­posed by hun­dreds of ad­vo­cacy groups for the vic­tims of sexu­al as­sault. On Monday, 220 of those groups co-signed a let­ter to mem­bers of Con­gress de­rid­ing the bill as well as sim­il­ar le­gis­la­tion. The groups ar­gue that re­quir­ing vic­tims to re­port sexu­al as­saults to the po­lice will re­duce the num­ber of as­saults that are re­por­ted.

Sal­mon and Ses­sions ar­gue that the po­lice are much bet­ter able to in­vest­ig­ate sexu­al-as­sault claims than school ad­min­is­trat­ors, or as is the case at some col­leges in the U.S., stu­dent-led pan­els and ath­let­ic de­part­ments. “The in­volve­ment of our justice sys­tem in these pro­ceed­ings is an ex­cel­lent way to en­sure that all parties’ rights are pro­tec­ted,” Sal­mon said in a state­ment.

Al­low­ing the schools to handle the cases, Sal­mon spokes­man Tristan Daedalus ar­gued, is in­suf­fi­cient giv­en their lim­ited abil­it­ies to pun­ish proven pred­at­ors. “You’re just loos­ing a sexu­al pred­at­or onto so­ci­ety at large,” he said.

The bill would al­low schools, however, to open up their own cases as soon as a vic­tim re­ports to po­lice. The school could then sus­pend an ac­cused rap­ist for 15 days while it pro­ceeds with its own pro­cess and hold ad­di­tion­al hear­ings to sus­pend the ac­cused stu­dent in 30-day blocks after that.

Re­quir­ing stu­dents to re­port to law en­force­ment as­sures due pro­cess for both the vic­tim and the ac­cused and en­sures that evid­en­ce is col­lec­ted in a timely man­ner, Sal­mon be­lieves. But he’s also open to mak­ing changes to strengthen the bill, Daedalus said.

Gil­librand said in an in­ter­view in her of­fice Tues­day that she can see why Greek or­gan­iz­a­tions back­ing Sal­mon’s bill be­lieve that in­volving law en­force­ment seems like the right and ob­vi­ous thing to do. It makes sense, she says, un­til you talk to vic­tims. “The reas­on why this crime is so un­der­re­por­ted is be­cause that pro­cess in and of it­self is so up­set­ting and so hard for them, it just nev­er gets re­por­ted,” Gil­librand said.

That’s why she and Mc­Caskill are so sur­prised to see na­tion­al sor­or­ity groups sup­port­ing the le­gis­la­tion. The sen­at­ors had pre­vi­ously planned to single out the sor­or­it­ies to try to get them to dis­avow the bill, un­con­vinced that the wo­men’s groups truly un­der­stood the im­plic­a­tions of the le­gis­la­tion they were so pub­licly back­ing. “Hon­es­tly, if they will­ingly are par­ti­cip­at­ing and sup­port­ing this bill and with know­ledge, that would be shock­ing,” Gil­librand said.

“I have not con­ceded that the sor­or­it­ies sup­port this al­tern­ate meas­ure. … I think someone around them was a grave dis­ser­vice to them and did not prop­erly de­scribe the im­pact of this oth­er le­gis­la­tion,” Gil­librand con­tin­ued. “And so I want to give them an op­por­tun­ity to per­haps re­ject what their col­leagues have done.”

But Gil­librand and Mc­Caskill were beaten to the punch by the Na­tion­al Pan­hel­len­ic Con­fer­en­ce and the North Amer­ic­an In­ter­fra­tern­ity Con­fer­en­ce—which rep­res­ent both fra­tern­it­ies and sor­or­it­ies across the coun­try—who re­ques­ted the meet­ing them­selves.

The two um­brella groups have in­creased their pub­lic vis­ib­il­ity on the is­sue of cam­pus sexu­al as­saults and have held hun­dreds of meet­ings on Cap­it­ol Hill. Giv­en the pres­en­ce of fra­tern­it­ies, in par­tic­u­lar, in high-pro­file sexu­al-as­sault cases and ac­cus­a­tions over the past sev­er­al years, the groups hope to play a ma­jor role in re­du­cing cam­pus as­saults.

Their re­quest fol­lows a let­ter the two Demo­crats sent to the NPC last week ar­guing that the Safe Cam­pus Act would “stifle re­port­ing and force vic­tims down a one size fits all pipeline against their wishes.”

Gil­librand and Mc­Caskill are pro­pos­ing an­oth­er solu­tion, and they hope to en­list the Greek or­gan­iz­a­tions to sup­port their own bill. Sal­mon, for his part, has not yet taken a po­s­i­tion on the Sen­ate le­gis­la­tion.

The Cam­pus Ac­count­ab­il­ity and Safety Act, which has 34 Sen­ate co­spon­sors in­clud­ing 12 Re­pub­lic­ans, would re­quire col­leges and uni­versit­ies to des­ig­nate a “Con­fid­en­tial Ad­vi­sor” who would as­sist vic­tims, provide in­form­a­tion on the dif­fer­ent re­port­ing op­tions avail­able to them, and guide them through whatever pro­cess they choose.

That choice, Gil­librand and her staff say, is key. Their le­gis­la­tion is in part in­spired by the suc­cess­ful part­ner­ship between the Ash­land, Ore­gon, po­lice de­part­ment and South­ern Ore­gon Uni­versity, which de­ve­loped a sim­il­ar “Cam­pus Choice” pro­gram that saw twice as many vic­tims de­cide to re­port those crimes to the po­lice in its first year.

The con­fid­en­tial ad­viser, Gil­librand said, would lay out op­tions for stu­dents rather than, as the Safe Cam­pus Act re­quires, for­cing them to go to the po­lice first. “[The ad­viser can] say, these are all your op­tions: You either go through the school sys­tem or you go through law en­force­ment. In the school sys­tem, all they can do is ac­com­mod­a­tions—the highest pen­alty is kick­ing [the as­sail­ant] out—but if they don’t have evid­en­ce, they will do noth­ing and the best thing they can do is change your class. So you bet­ter get that rape kit,” Gil­librand said.

Al­low­ing vic­tims to make the choice to ap­proach po­lice of­ficers on their own sched­ule can be hugely be­ne­fi­cial, Gil­librand said, both to the vic­tim and to the po­lice. “If you lose her on that first day be­cause you’ve in­tim­id­ated or scared her or made her feel guilty, you’ve lost your wit­ness,” she said.

But even in cases in which vic­tims de­cide not to go for­ward with leg­al pro­ceed­ings, Gil­librand said, re­port­ing can still give au­thor­it­ies the op­por­tun­ity to link sim­il­ar cases. And that, in turn, can lead to re­duced sexu­al vi­ol­en­ce on col­lege cam­puses. “If there’s two oth­er vic­tims, [the ini­tial vic­tim will] say, ‘Oh, my God, so it wasn’t me; it wasn’t that I was drink­ing; it wasn’t my fault.’  … They’ll be more in­clined to say, ‘Of course I will testi­fy against him,’” Gil­librand said.

The Gil­librand-Mc­Caskill bill would also re­quire train­ing for school em­ploy­ees on sexu­al-as­sault pre­ven­tion and re­sponse, and re­quire schools to co­or­din­ate re­sponse plans with loc­al law en­force­ment.

The two sen­at­ors are hope­ful that their pitch will be well-re­ceived by the Greek or­gan­iz­a­tions, po­ten­tially killing the Safe Cam­pus Act in fa­vor of their own le­gis­la­tion.

Gil­librand summed up their pitch Tues­day: “If you man­date re­port­ing to a po­lice of­ficer for any­thing to be done and then you say noth­ing can be done by the col­lege un­til they’re done, well, in­vest­ig­a­tions can take months, months, months—can take a year. I mean, you’re just talk­ing about, ar­gu­ably, a rap­ist on cam­pus. So if you ex­plain that to someone who‘s not been fully in­formed, they’ll say, ‘Oh, my good­ness, I would nev­er want that to hap­pen.’”

And if that doesn’t work, she and Mc­Caskill are work­ing on next steps: reach­ing out fra­tern­ity and sor­or­ity alum­nae and mem­bers across the coun­try. “They need to know what their or­gan­iz­a­tions are do­ing with their dues,” Gil­librand said.

What We're Following See More »
Kudlow Says Trade Deal with Mexico Is Close
6 hours ago

White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow said that U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer is "getting close" to a deal with Mexico. Kudlow added that trade talks with China are set to resume shortly.

Trump: Country Was Built on Tariffs
6 hours ago
Manafort Case Moves to Closing Arguments
1 days ago
Manafort Defense Rests
2 days ago
Judge Holds Witness in Contempt in Manafort Case
6 days ago

"A federal judge has found a witness in contempt for refusing to testify before the grand jury hearing evidence in special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. U.S. District Chief Judge Beryl Howell made the ruling Friday after a sealed hearing to discuss Andrew Miller’s refusal to appear before the grand jury. Miller is a former aide to longtime Trump confidant Roger Stone."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.