You can look at polls and read news accounts all day long, but the frustration, despair—and, in some cases, rage—among a multitude of Republican voters can be lost in the numbers. Better to let them just talk. Anecdotally, you can chat with friends, relatives, neighbors, cabdrivers, and other regular folks. But the antipathy really comes through when you listen in on Republican voters gathered in focus groups, such as one convened last week in Indianapolis by pollster Peter Hart. Since 2004, Hart has conducted focus groups of voters for the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania, and no one does it better.
The dozen Indiana Republicans, all likely voters, put into context why more than half of the potential participants in GOP primaries and caucuses are currently supporting business magnate Donald Trump, physician Ben Carson, or ex-CEO Carly Fiorina, who still counts as a political novice despite having lost a U.S. Senate race in California. Disaffected voters seem to be yearning for someone who is the antithesis of a traditional politician.
The Benghazi committee’s myopia left Hillary Clinton’s vulnerabilities with swing voters untouched.
Which someone? Well, according to opinion polls, that depends—on voters’ social and economic class and religious beliefs (or the lack thereof) and on the candidates’ temperament. Downscale whites, along with some tea party adherents and other populists, tend to gravitate toward Trump. The soft-spoken Carson draws support from women and voters who are somewhat more upscale, white-collar, and religious (who attend church at least weekly). Fiorina’s support is even more upscale and considerably more cerebral, but it’s harder to pin down beyond that.
The common denominator for participants in the focus group: a desire for someone who is untainted by the political process. They see policy expertise and experience in public office as, at a minimum, vastly overrated or—for some participants—downright disqualifying. This is quite a switch for a political party that has traditionally gone for known commodities, for candidates the voters felt they knew and were comfortable with.
“Voters are paying attention and are much more in the process than in previous political years,” Hart and his associate, Corrie Hunt, concluded in an analysis prepared after the focus group, using data from quantitative surveys. Knowledge remains at the “sound bite” level, they reported, but voters’ “awareness and perceptions of the major candidates are still quite formed.”
Jeb Bush’s Gut-Check Moment
He’s never faced anything like this before, and he’s about to find out just how good of a politician he can be.
Trump remains the pivot point—“the ‘straw that stirs the drink,’ ” as Hart and Hunt put it, “both in this group and among voters overall.” Even so, they said, Trump’s high poll numbers “obscure a sense of concern and uncertainty that these voters voiced about having him as president of the United States. But for now, they are attracted to him like a moth is to a flame.” The candidates’ temperament, the pollsters found, is crucial: “For these participants, Donald Trump feels too strong and divisive, Jeb Bush feels too soft and staid, and currently Ben Carson emerges as a calm and upstanding person they like.” Marco Rubio and Carly Fiorina “have broken through and show appeal,” the pollsters added, while John Kasich and Ted Cruz “are on the outskirts.”
In what I thought was their most perceptive conclusion about Republican voters’ state of mind, Hart and Hunt observed: “Behind all of this is a sense that these people have done a better job of figuring out what they are against rather than what they are for. Part of the challenge that emerges for Republicans is that there appears to be nothing positive around which they can unite. Much of this discussion was spent railing against what is wrong rather than searching for a uniting vision of what they want in their nominee. A uniting leader may yet emerge, but for now the consensus is around a quiet man versus
The 1 Easy Way Donald Trump Could Have Been Even Richer: Doing Nothing
By putting his inheritance into the stock market back in the 1970s, Trump might have been “really rich” without all the drama.
Part of what is wrong, to these Republicans, is their party’s performance in Congress. “They feel let down by leaders who have failed to take advantage of their majority position and given in far too many times to a president they see as overstepping his authority,” the pollsters reported. “These primary voters have lost patience with current Republican leaders who they believe have failed to unite the party and work together to achieve real results.”
And so, the belief takes hold—in the political establishment, at least—that conservative commentators and opinion leaders have raised unrealistic expectations about what can be done in Washington without filibuster- and veto-proof Republican majorities in Congress—or control of the White House. Complicated issues get dumbed down.
“We’re sick of career politicians,” said a woman in the focus group who supports Trump, and “we’re out to clean house.” Another woman, a Carson backer, said that politicians “don’t keep their word. Their morals are loose. They don’t have values. We’re just tired of them. We’re ready for someone who has not been in that role.”
What We're Following See More »
"North Korea said on Friday it might test a hydrogen bomb over the Pacific Ocean after President Donald Trump vowed to destroy the reclusive country, with leader Kim Jong Un promising to make Trump pay dearly for his threats. Kim did not specify what action he would take against the United States or Trump, whom he called a 'mentally deranged U.S. dotard' in the latest bout of insults the two leaders have traded in recent weeks."
President Trump this afternoon announced another round of sanctions on North Korea, calling the regime "a continuing threat." The executive order, which Trump relayed to Congress, bans any ship or plane that has visited North Korea from visiting the United States within 180 days. The order also authorizes sanctions on any financial institution doing business with North Korea, and permits the secretaries of State and the Treasury to sanction any person involved in trading with North Korea, operating a port there, or involved in a variety of industries there.
In response to a reporter's question, President Trump said "he’ll be looking to impose further financial penalties on North Korea over its nuclear and ballistic tests. ... The U.N. has passed two resolutions recently aimed at squeezing the North Korean economy by cutting off oil, labor and exports to the nation." Meanwhile, the Guardian reports that South Korea's unification ministry is sending an $8m aid package aimed at infants and pregnant women in North Korea. The "humanitarian gesture [is] at odds with calls by Japan and the US for unwavering economic and diplomatic pressure on Pyongyang."
President Trump on Tuesday night met with UN Secretary Guterres and President of the General Assembly Miroslav Lajcak. In both cases, as per releases from the White House, Trump pressed them on the need to reform the UN bureaucracy.