In Search of the Anti-Politician

A lot of Republican voters are mad as hell, and they’re choosing between a quiet man and a loudmouth.

Ben Carson, right, watches as Donald Trump speaks during the CNBC Republican presidential debate at the University of Colorado, Wednesday, Oct. 28, 2015, in Boulder, Colo.
AP Photo/Mark J. Terrill
Charlie Cook
Add to Briefcase
Charlie Cook
Oct. 30, 2015, 5 a.m.

You can look at polls and read news ac­counts all day long, but the frus­tra­tion, des­pair—and, in some cases, rage—among a mul­ti­tude of Re­pub­lic­an voters can be lost in the num­bers. Bet­ter to let them just talk. An­ec­dot­ally, you can chat with friends, re­l­at­ives, neigh­bors, cab­drivers, and oth­er reg­u­lar folks. But the an­ti­pathy really comes through when you listen in on Re­pub­lic­an voters gathered in fo­cus groups, such as one con­vened last week in In­di­ana­pol­is by poll­ster Peter Hart. Since 2004, Hart has con­duc­ted fo­cus groups of voters for the Annen­berg Pub­lic Policy Cen­ter at the Uni­versity of Pennsylvania, and no one does it bet­ter.

The dozen In­di­ana Re­pub­lic­ans, all likely voters, put in­to con­text why more than half of the po­ten­tial par­ti­cipants in GOP primar­ies and caucuses are cur­rently sup­port­ing busi­ness mag­nate Don­ald Trump, phys­i­cian Ben Car­son, or ex-CEO Carly Fior­ina, who still counts as a polit­ic­al novice des­pite hav­ing lost a U.S. Sen­ate race in Cali­for­nia. Dis­af­fected voters seem to be yearn­ing for someone who is the an­ti­thes­is of a tra­di­tion­al politi­cian.

Which someone? Well, ac­cord­ing to opin­ion polls, that de­pends—on voters’ so­cial and eco­nom­ic class and re­li­gious be­liefs (or the lack there­of) and on the can­did­ates’ tem­pera­ment. Down­scale whites, along with some tea party ad­her­ents and oth­er pop­u­lists, tend to grav­it­ate to­ward Trump. The soft-spoken Car­son draws sup­port from wo­men and voters who are some­what more up­scale, white-col­lar, and re­li­gious (who at­tend church at least weekly). Fior­ina’s sup­port is even more up­scale and con­sid­er­ably more cereb­ral, but it’s harder to pin down bey­ond that.

The com­mon de­nom­in­at­or for par­ti­cipants in the fo­cus group: a de­sire for someone who is un­tain­ted by the polit­ic­al pro­cess. They see policy ex­pert­ise and ex­per­i­ence in pub­lic of­fice as, at a min­im­um, vastly over­rated or—for some par­ti­cipants—down­right dis­qual­i­fy­ing. This is quite a switch for a polit­ic­al party that has tra­di­tion­ally gone for known com­mod­it­ies, for can­did­ates the voters felt they knew and were com­fort­able with.

“Voters are pay­ing at­ten­tion and are much more in the pro­cess than in pre­vi­ous polit­ic­al years,” Hart and his as­so­ci­ate, Cor­rie Hunt, con­cluded in an ana­lys­is pre­pared after the fo­cus group, us­ing data from quant­it­at­ive sur­veys. Know­ledge re­mains at the “sound bite” level, they re­por­ted, but voters’ “aware­ness and per­cep­tions of the ma­jor can­did­ates are still quite formed.”

Trump re­mains the pivot point—“the ‘straw that stirs the drink,’ ” as Hart and Hunt put it, “both in this group and among voters over­all.” Even so, they said, Trump’s high poll num­bers “ob­scure a sense of con­cern and un­cer­tainty that these voters voiced about hav­ing him as pres­id­ent of the United States. But for now, they are at­trac­ted to him like a moth is to a flame.” The can­did­ates’ tem­pera­ment, the poll­sters found, is cru­cial: “For these par­ti­cipants, Don­ald Trump feels too strong and di­vis­ive, Jeb Bush feels too soft and staid, and cur­rently Ben Car­son emerges as a calm and up­stand­ing per­son they like.” Marco Ru­bio and Carly Fior­ina “have broken through and show ap­peal,” the poll­sters ad­ded, while John Kasich and Ted Cruz “are on the out­skirts.”

In what I thought was their most per­cept­ive con­clu­sion about Re­pub­lic­an voters’ state of mind, Hart and Hunt ob­served: “Be­hind all of this is a sense that these people have done a bet­ter job of fig­ur­ing out what they are against rather than what they are for. Part of the chal­lenge that emerges for Re­pub­lic­ans is that there ap­pears to be noth­ing pos­it­ive around which they can unite. Much of this dis­cus­sion was spent rail­ing against what is wrong rather than search­ing for a unit­ing vis­ion of what they want in their nom­in­ee. A unit­ing lead­er may yet emerge, but for now the con­sensus is around a quiet man versus
a loud­mouth.”

Part of what is wrong, to these Re­pub­lic­ans, is their party’s per­form­ance in Con­gress. “They feel let down by lead­ers who have failed to take ad­vant­age of their ma­jor­ity po­s­i­tion and giv­en in far too many times to a pres­id­ent they see as over­step­ping his au­thor­ity,” the poll­sters re­por­ted. “These primary voters have lost pa­tience with cur­rent Re­pub­lic­an lead­ers who they be­lieve have failed to unite the party and work to­geth­er to achieve real res­ults.”

And so, the be­lief takes hold—in the polit­ic­al es­tab­lish­ment, at least—that con­ser­vat­ive com­ment­at­ors and opin­ion lead­ers have raised un­real­ist­ic ex­pect­a­tions about what can be done in Wash­ing­ton without fili­buster- and veto-proof Re­pub­lic­an ma­jor­it­ies in Con­gress—or con­trol of the White House. Com­plic­ated is­sues get dumbed down.

“We’re sick of ca­reer politi­cians,” said a wo­man in the fo­cus group who sup­ports Trump, and “we’re out to clean house.” An­oth­er wo­man, a Car­son back­er, said that politi­cians “don’t keep their word. Their mor­als are loose. They don’t have val­ues. We’re just tired of them. We’re ready for someone who has not been in that role.”

What We're Following See More »
UN Security Council Condemns N. Korea Launch
34 minutes ago
White House Snubs OGE’s Request for Info on Waivers
3 hours ago

"The Trump administration, in a significant escalation of its clash with the government’s top ethics watchdog, has moved to block an effort to disclose any ethics waivers granted to former lobbyists who now work in the White House or federal agencies." The White House sent a letter to OGE head Walter Shaub, which "challenged his legal authority to demand the information. Dozens of former lobbyists and industry lawyers are working in the Trump administration, which has hired them at a much higher rate than the previous administration. Keeping the waivers confidential would make it impossible to know whether any such officials are violating federal ethics rules or have been given a pass to ignore them."

Turkey Summons U.S. Ambassador
3 hours ago
Court Rules Against NC Voting Districts, Says They Were Racially Motivated
3 hours ago

"The Supreme Court ruled Monday that racial considerations pervaded the way North Carolina lawmakers drew congressional maps after the 2010 Census in order to maximize Republicans' advantage. The 5-3 ruling, written by Justice Elena Kagan, was the latest in a series of decisions by the justices against the excessive use of race in redistricting, the decennial process of drawing new district lines for Congress and state legislatures. Justice Clarence Thomas joined the court's four liberal justices in striking down the state's maps."

SCOTUS Rules Against Venue Shopping in Patent Cases
4 hours ago

Writing for an 8-0 Supreme Court on Monday, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that patent lawsuits "must be brought in the state where the defendant company is incorporated. ... The ruling likely spells an end to the near-monopoly the federal court in the Eastern District of Texas holds in handling patent cases. Plaintiffs for decades have filed suits in that pro-plaintiff district based on a broader interpretation of venue that made suits possible almost anywhere."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.