White House Endorses Cyber Bill, Bucking Privacy Groups

The Senate’s bill gains momentum ahead of a vote next week.

President Obama speaks during a forum on Thursday in the Old Executive Office Building on the White House complex in Washington.
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Kaveh Waddell
Add to Briefcase
Kaveh Waddell
Oct. 22, 2015, 7:30 p.m.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion on Thursday en­dorsed a cy­ber­se­cur­ity bill that will get a vote next week in the Sen­ate.

Laud­ing the Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee’s re­cent work that tweaked the bill to bol­ster its pri­vacy pro­tec­tions, the White House said it sup­ports pas­sage of the Cy­ber­se­cur­ity In­form­a­tion Shar­ing Act, or CISA, but laid out a few out­stand­ing con­cerns.

The bill over­came a key pro­ced­ur­al hurdle Thursday when the Sen­ate over­whelm­ingly voted to move CISA for­ward. Next week, a hand­ful of amend­ments will re­ceive a vote be­fore the Sen­ate votes on fi­nal pas­sage of the bill.

CISA of­fers in­cent­ives to private com­pan­ies to share in­form­a­tion about cy­ber­threats with the gov­ern­ment and oth­er busi­nesses, with the goal of boost­ing the cy­ber­se­cur­ity of all in­volved.

The bill, which passed out of the Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee nearly un­an­im­ously earli­er this year, is backed by busi­ness, fin­an­cial, and re­tail as­so­ci­ations, but has come un­der heavy fire from civil-rights and pri­vacy groups that con­sider the bill’s pri­vacy pro­tec­tions too weak. In re­cent weeks, a grow­ing num­ber of tech com­pan­ies and the as­so­ci­ations that rep­res­ent them have also dis­tanced them­selves from the bill.

The White House’s state­ment re­leased Thursday night is a re­jec­tion of the groups’ at­tempts to or­gan­ize a grass­roots back­lash against CISA. A num­ber of or­gan­iz­a­tions ban­ded to­geth­er this week to en­cour­age con­stitu­ents to call their sen­at­ors, and planned an anti-CISA rally in front of the Cap­it­ol Thursday night.

In the state­ment, the ad­min­is­tra­tion said it was “en­cour­aged” by the ef­fort from co­spon­sors Richard Burr and Di­anne Fein­stein to work in amend­ments and changes to their bill, which it said “strengthened the le­gis­la­tion and in­cor­por­ated im­port­ant modi­fic­a­tions to bet­ter pro­tect pri­vacy.”

But the White House also ar­gued that the De­part­ment of Home­land Se­cur­ity should be the cent­ral clear­ing­house for in­com­ing data, and cri­ti­cized the bill for al­low­ing com­pan­ies to share data with any agency, in­clud­ing mil­it­ary agen­cies like the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency. The state­ment urged sen­at­ors to re­ject amend­ments that would of­fer li­ab­il­ity pro­tec­tions to com­pan­ies for shar­ing with gov­ern­ment en­tit­ies oth­er than DHS. The ad­min­is­tra­tion was likely re­fer­ring to an amend­ment offered by Sen. Tom Cot­ton that would ex­tend pro­tec­tion for com­pan­ies that share in­form­a­tion with the FBI or the Secret Ser­vice.

The ad­min­is­tra­tion said it also op­poses CISA’s au­thor­iz­a­tion of cer­tain de­fens­ive meas­ures, which it said could res­ult in “a dir­ect de­le­ter­i­ous im­pact on for­eign policy, the in­teg­rity of in­form­a­tion sys­tems, and cy­ber­se­cur­ity” if used im­prop­erly.

The White House had pre­vi­ously in­dic­ated its sup­port for the Sen­ate in­form­a­tion-shar­ing le­gis­la­tion, but the of­fi­cial state­ment of ad­min­is­tra­tion policy re­leased Thursday is the most de­tailed out­line it has shared of its sup­port and re­ser­va­tions. In 2012 and 2013, the White House threatened to veto a re­lated bill, the Cy­ber In­tel­li­gence Shar­ing and Pro­tec­tion Act, or CISPA, say­ing it lacked ad­equate pri­vacy pro­tec­tions.

Even if CISA passes on Tues­day, there are sev­er­al hurdles left for it to clear be­fore it ar­rives at the pres­id­ent’s desk. Two sep­ar­ate House ver­sions of the bill would still need to be aligned with the Sen­ate bill in a con­fer­ence, and both cham­bers would need to pass a fi­nal, uni­fied ver­sion of the le­gis­la­tion.

What We're Following See More »
ESCORT SERVICES USED TO WOO RECRUITS
NCAA Strips Louisville of Basketball Championship
0 minute ago
THE LATEST

The N.C.A.A. "upheld penalties against Louisville’s men’s basketball program related to a sex scandal involving players, recruits and prostitutes, and ordered the university to forfeit dozens of victories, including its 2013 national championship." Andre McGee, a former Louisville player serving on the basketball staff in 2013, solicited an escort service that he used to entertain recruits in an on-campus dormitory. Louisville officials called the decision "wrong." It is the first time the N.C.A.A. has stripped a program of the national championship.

Source:
HALF OF 2016 LEVELS
Hiring of Deportation Officers Drops Under Trump
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Trump administration is failing to hire law enforcement personnel to enforce immigration laws despite a significant push to do so, according to new Homeland Security Department documents. The hiring of new deportation officers at Immigration and Customs Enforcement dropped in half to just 371 total in 2017, according to information provided to potential vendors for a contract to help ICE boost hiring."

Source:
HEARING THIS AFTERNOON
Mueller Indicts Attorney for Making False Statements About Gates
4 hours ago
THE LATEST
THE QUESTION
What’s the Value of Suspicious Transactions by Paul Manafort that Mueller Is Investigating?
4 hours ago
THE ANSWER

About $40 million, "a much larger sum than was cited in his October indictment on money laundering charges."

Source:
SHOW OF FORCE TO MOSCOW
Two U.S. Navy Destroyers Operating in Black Sea
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Under cover of darkness, U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer USS Ross (DDG-71) slipped through the Bosporus Strait and into the Black Sea on Friday. The next day USS Carney (DDG-64) joined Ross. The ships are operating are part of an unspecified regional “proactive” presence mission in the sea bordered by Russia, according to the Navy."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login