Navigating the Maze of Electronic Health Records

The HELP panel is trying to pull together legislation that clears several high hurdles.

Susan Lynch, a nurse practitioner, checks over a patient's electronic medical records, at the Central Florida Family Health Center in Sanford, Florida.
AP Photo/John Raoux
Oct. 21, 2015, 9:30 p.m.

Christine Bechtel dropped off a copy of the Fed­er­al Re­gister at her doc­tor’s of­fice. The con­sumer ad­voc­ate was in the midst of a pro­longed battle to ob­tain elec­tron­ic cop­ies of her health re­cords from a primary care prac­tice whose em­ploy­ees seemed be­fuddled when told they had to provide them.

So Bechtel showed them the rules, and by the end of the roughly two-week or­deal, she had two files of health data, al­beit in a rather out­dated me­di­um: a CD-ROM.

Bechtel de­tailed her dif­fi­culties in get­ting her own pa­tient data at a June Sen­ate Health, Edu­ca­tion, Labor, and Pen­sions Com­mit­tee hear­ing, her an­ec­dote serving as a snap­shot of the prob­lems plaguing elec­tron­ic health re­cords that the pan­el hopes to fix in a med­ic­al-in­nov­a­tion bill likely to be in­tro­duced this year.

Earli­er this month, the com­mit­tee pol­ished off its sixth and fi­nal hear­ing on health in­form­a­tion tech­no­logy. It’s the first time that the pan­el has ex­amined health IT in depth since 2009, when the HITECH Act meant to en­cour­age its ad­op­tion be­came law as part of the stim­u­lus pack­age and fun­nelled bil­lions in­to health IT, Chair­man Lamar Al­ex­an­der said at the in­aug­ur­al hear­ing. The hours of hear­ings shed light on elec­tron­ic health-re­cord sys­tems that can’t al­ways ex­change in­form­a­tion between vendors, some­times en­gage in in­form­a­tion block­ing, and don’t con­sist­ently give pa­tients easy ac­cess to their own health data.

In late April, Al­ex­an­der and the pan­el’s top Demo­crat, Patty Mur­ray, an­nounced full-com­mit­tee work­ing groups for staff, hom­ing in on ways to im­prove elec­tron­ic health re­cords. Since then, the groups have held dis­cus­sions with health pro­viders, in­form­a­tion-tech­no­logy de­velopers, and oth­er ex­perts in the health IT field—a way of learn­ing what’s really hap­pen­ing on the ground.

Since the hear­ings have come to a close, the work­ing groups are set­ting pri­or­it­ies of items to be in­cluded in the bill, and through the pan­el’s six hear­ings, they already have in­sight in­to mem­bers’ thoughts on ways to ad­vance elec­tron­ic health re­cords.

Al­ex­an­der’s state­ments and pub­lic re­marks have noted that the com­mit­tee has “been work­ing with the ad­min­is­tra­tion di­li­gently for months to de­vel­op sev­en areas of agree­ment for le­gis­la­tion to ac­tu­ally achieve in­ter­op­er­ab­il­ity.” They are: De­creas­ing what he called “un­ne­ces­sary phys­i­cian doc­u­ment­a­tion,” let­ting pa­tients have easy ac­cess to their re­cords, hav­ing elec­tron­ic health re­cords be more ac­cess­ible to the whole health-care team, halt­ing in­form­a­tion block­ing, im­prov­ing stand­ards, bet­ter­ing re­cords’ se­cur­ity and pri­vacy, and mak­ing sure that a cer­ti­fic­a­tion of a re­cords sys­tem means what it says it does.

“We’ve really be­come very in­ter­ested in elec­tron­ic health care re­cords, which are es­sen­tial to pre­ci­sion medi­cine, which is the pres­id­ent’s pro­pos­al, and to the shared goal of Con­gress and the pres­id­ent to change the way we pay doc­tors from fee-for-ser­vice to the qual­ity of the ser­vice they de­liv­er,” the Ten­ness­ee Re­pub­lic­an said in an in­ter­view. “And in both cases, hav­ing good, func­tion­ing elec­tron­ic health care re­cords helps the doc­tor do a bet­ter job of serving pa­tients. And that pro­gram got off track.”

At the last hear­ing, Mur­ray said stand­ards need to be de­veloped so that doc­tors and hos­pit­als can un­der­stand data even if it comes from a dif­fer­ent elec­tron­ic re­cord sys­tem and from a dif­fer­ent hos­pit­al. A “net­work of net­works” needs to be cre­ated so that health pro­viders can share in­form­a­tion, she said, equat­ing this with a Ve­r­i­zon cell-phone user be­ing able to call a friend with a Sprint plan.   

And there are more top goals for the Wash­ing­ton state Demo­crat: De­vel­op­ing ro­bust se­cur­ity, fa­cil­it­at­ing easy ways for pro­viders to shop and com­pare elec­tron­ic re­cords sys­tems, and help­ing pa­tients have ac­cess to their health data.

“If you can eas­ily look up and down­load your bank state­ment, you should be able to do the same with your med­ic­al his­tory,” Mur­ray said at the fi­nal health IT hear­ing on Oct. 1. “But for far too many pa­tients, these ex­per­i­ences are very dif­fer­ent. … I think we can and must do bet­ter.”

There’s a bi­par­tis­an bill that ad­dresses a por­tion of these con­cerns that HELP Com­mit­tee mem­bers Bill Cas­sidy and Shel­don White­house in­tro­duced in early Oc­to­ber, and ac­cord­ing to a HELP GOP aide, Al­ex­an­der ex­pects that many of their pro­pos­als could be in­cor­por­ated in­to the com­mit­tee’s up­com­ing med­ic­al in­nov­a­tion bill. The Trust IT Act of 2015 aims to es­tab­lish a health IT rat­ing sys­tem so that cus­tom­ers can com­pare products, pro­hib­it health IT vendors from in­form­a­tion block­ing, man­date products meet se­cur­ity and in­ter­op­er­ab­il­ity re­quire­ments, and more.

In ad­di­tion, Al­ex­an­der has cri­ti­cized the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s speed in rolling out a third stage of rules that provide fin­an­cial in­cent­ives for the “mean­ing­ful use” of elec­tron­ic health re­cords. A Septem­ber re­port by the con­gres­sion­al watch­dog, the Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice—a re­port that Al­ex­an­der and some of the oth­er Sen­ate com­mit­tee chairs re­ques­ted—de­tailed trends culled from dis­cus­sions with rep­res­ent­at­ives from 18 non­fed­er­al or­gan­iz­a­tions work­ing on the abil­ity of elec­tron­ic health-re­cord sys­tems to ex­change in­form­a­tion, known as in­ter­op­er­ab­il­ity. Rep­res­ent­at­ives from 10 of these ini­ti­at­ives stated that the “mean­ing­ful use” pro­gram’s re­quire­ments “di­vert re­sources and at­ten­tion from oth­er ef­forts to en­able in­ter­op­er­ab­il­ity.”

Al­ex­an­der op­poses rolling out the last set of rules at the timetable the ad­min­is­tra­tion has set. Yet it’s un­clear wheth­er any changes would be wrapped in­to a lar­ger med­ic­al-in­nov­a­tion pack­age or a sep­ar­ate piece of le­gis­la­tion (and it could also be over­turned through the Con­gres­sion­al Re­view Act).

In the mean­time, the com­mit­tee is fo­cus­ing on im­prov­ing health in­form­a­tion tech­no­logy—an at­tempt at cre­at­ing a ma­jor med­ic­al-in­nov­a­tion bill both parties can sup­port, just like the chair­man and rank­ing mem­ber have done in the past.

What We're Following See More »
FOR IMPROPER SPENDING, INFLUENCE
Trump Inauguration Spending Now Under Investigation
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Federal prosecutors in Manhattan are investigating whether President Trump’s 2017 inaugural committee misspent some of the record $107 million it raised from donations, people familiar with the matter said. The criminal probe by the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office, which is in its early stages, also is examining whether some of the committee’s top donors gave money in exchange for access to the incoming Trump administration, policy concessions or to influence official administration positions."

Source:
PINS KHASHOGGI KILLING ON MBS
Senate Moves to End Support for Saudi War
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE
FACES UP TO FIVE YEARS
Butina Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Alleged Russian spy Maria Butina pleaded guilty in federal court Thursday for conspiracy to act as an illegal foreign agent in the United States. Butina, 30, was accused of working to infiltrate Republican political circles through groups such as the National Rifle Association to bolster Russian interests." She admitted to acting "under direction of" Alexander Torshin. "She faces a maximum of five years in prison and will likely be deported after serving any time."

Source:
HIS LAWYERS ASKED FOR LENIENCY
Cohen Sentenced to 36 Months in Prison
4 days ago
THE LATEST
HEADS TO HOUSE FOR FINAL PASSAGE
Senate Passes Farm Bill, 87-13
5 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login