Navigating the Maze of Electronic Health Records

The HELP panel is trying to pull together legislation that clears several high hurdles.

Susan Lynch, a nurse practitioner, checks over a patient's electronic medical records, at the Central Florida Family Health Center in Sanford, Florida.
AP Photo/John Raoux
Rachel Roubein
Add to Briefcase
Rachel Roubein
Oct. 21, 2015, 9:30 p.m.

Christine Bechtel dropped off a copy of the Fed­er­al Re­gister at her doc­tor’s of­fice. The con­sumer ad­voc­ate was in the midst of a pro­longed battle to ob­tain elec­tron­ic cop­ies of her health re­cords from a primary care prac­tice whose em­ploy­ees seemed be­fuddled when told they had to provide them.

So Bechtel showed them the rules, and by the end of the roughly two-week or­deal, she had two files of health data, al­beit in a rather out­dated me­di­um: a CD-ROM.

Bechtel de­tailed her dif­fi­culties in get­ting her own pa­tient data at a June Sen­ate Health, Edu­ca­tion, Labor, and Pen­sions Com­mit­tee hear­ing, her an­ec­dote serving as a snap­shot of the prob­lems plaguing elec­tron­ic health re­cords that the pan­el hopes to fix in a med­ic­al-in­nov­a­tion bill likely to be in­tro­duced this year.

Earli­er this month, the com­mit­tee pol­ished off its sixth and fi­nal hear­ing on health in­form­a­tion tech­no­logy. It’s the first time that the pan­el has ex­amined health IT in depth since 2009, when the HITECH Act meant to en­cour­age its ad­op­tion be­came law as part of the stim­u­lus pack­age and fun­nelled bil­lions in­to health IT, Chair­man Lamar Al­ex­an­der said at the in­aug­ur­al hear­ing. The hours of hear­ings shed light on elec­tron­ic health-re­cord sys­tems that can’t al­ways ex­change in­form­a­tion between vendors, some­times en­gage in in­form­a­tion block­ing, and don’t con­sist­ently give pa­tients easy ac­cess to their own health data.

In late April, Al­ex­an­der and the pan­el’s top Demo­crat, Patty Mur­ray, an­nounced full-com­mit­tee work­ing groups for staff, hom­ing in on ways to im­prove elec­tron­ic health re­cords. Since then, the groups have held dis­cus­sions with health pro­viders, in­form­a­tion-tech­no­logy de­velopers, and oth­er ex­perts in the health IT field—a way of learn­ing what’s really hap­pen­ing on the ground.

Since the hear­ings have come to a close, the work­ing groups are set­ting pri­or­it­ies of items to be in­cluded in the bill, and through the pan­el’s six hear­ings, they already have in­sight in­to mem­bers’ thoughts on ways to ad­vance elec­tron­ic health re­cords.

Al­ex­an­der’s state­ments and pub­lic re­marks have noted that the com­mit­tee has “been work­ing with the ad­min­is­tra­tion di­li­gently for months to de­vel­op sev­en areas of agree­ment for le­gis­la­tion to ac­tu­ally achieve in­ter­op­er­ab­il­ity.” They are: De­creas­ing what he called “un­ne­ces­sary phys­i­cian doc­u­ment­a­tion,” let­ting pa­tients have easy ac­cess to their re­cords, hav­ing elec­tron­ic health re­cords be more ac­cess­ible to the whole health-care team, halt­ing in­form­a­tion block­ing, im­prov­ing stand­ards, bet­ter­ing re­cords’ se­cur­ity and pri­vacy, and mak­ing sure that a cer­ti­fic­a­tion of a re­cords sys­tem means what it says it does.

“We’ve really be­come very in­ter­ested in elec­tron­ic health care re­cords, which are es­sen­tial to pre­ci­sion medi­cine, which is the pres­id­ent’s pro­pos­al, and to the shared goal of Con­gress and the pres­id­ent to change the way we pay doc­tors from fee-for-ser­vice to the qual­ity of the ser­vice they de­liv­er,” the Ten­ness­ee Re­pub­lic­an said in an in­ter­view. “And in both cases, hav­ing good, func­tion­ing elec­tron­ic health care re­cords helps the doc­tor do a bet­ter job of serving pa­tients. And that pro­gram got off track.”

At the last hear­ing, Mur­ray said stand­ards need to be de­veloped so that doc­tors and hos­pit­als can un­der­stand data even if it comes from a dif­fer­ent elec­tron­ic re­cord sys­tem and from a dif­fer­ent hos­pit­al. A “net­work of net­works” needs to be cre­ated so that health pro­viders can share in­form­a­tion, she said, equat­ing this with a Ve­r­i­zon cell-phone user be­ing able to call a friend with a Sprint plan.   

And there are more top goals for the Wash­ing­ton state Demo­crat: De­vel­op­ing ro­bust se­cur­ity, fa­cil­it­at­ing easy ways for pro­viders to shop and com­pare elec­tron­ic re­cords sys­tems, and help­ing pa­tients have ac­cess to their health data.

“If you can eas­ily look up and down­load your bank state­ment, you should be able to do the same with your med­ic­al his­tory,” Mur­ray said at the fi­nal health IT hear­ing on Oct. 1. “But for far too many pa­tients, these ex­per­i­ences are very dif­fer­ent. … I think we can and must do bet­ter.”

There’s a bi­par­tis­an bill that ad­dresses a por­tion of these con­cerns that HELP Com­mit­tee mem­bers Bill Cas­sidy and Shel­don White­house in­tro­duced in early Oc­to­ber, and ac­cord­ing to a HELP GOP aide, Al­ex­an­der ex­pects that many of their pro­pos­als could be in­cor­por­ated in­to the com­mit­tee’s up­com­ing med­ic­al in­nov­a­tion bill. The Trust IT Act of 2015 aims to es­tab­lish a health IT rat­ing sys­tem so that cus­tom­ers can com­pare products, pro­hib­it health IT vendors from in­form­a­tion block­ing, man­date products meet se­cur­ity and in­ter­op­er­ab­il­ity re­quire­ments, and more.

In ad­di­tion, Al­ex­an­der has cri­ti­cized the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s speed in rolling out a third stage of rules that provide fin­an­cial in­cent­ives for the “mean­ing­ful use” of elec­tron­ic health re­cords. A Septem­ber re­port by the con­gres­sion­al watch­dog, the Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice—a re­port that Al­ex­an­der and some of the oth­er Sen­ate com­mit­tee chairs re­ques­ted—de­tailed trends culled from dis­cus­sions with rep­res­ent­at­ives from 18 non­fed­er­al or­gan­iz­a­tions work­ing on the abil­ity of elec­tron­ic health-re­cord sys­tems to ex­change in­form­a­tion, known as in­ter­op­er­ab­il­ity. Rep­res­ent­at­ives from 10 of these ini­ti­at­ives stated that the “mean­ing­ful use” pro­gram’s re­quire­ments “di­vert re­sources and at­ten­tion from oth­er ef­forts to en­able in­ter­op­er­ab­il­ity.”

Al­ex­an­der op­poses rolling out the last set of rules at the timetable the ad­min­is­tra­tion has set. Yet it’s un­clear wheth­er any changes would be wrapped in­to a lar­ger med­ic­al-in­nov­a­tion pack­age or a sep­ar­ate piece of le­gis­la­tion (and it could also be over­turned through the Con­gres­sion­al Re­view Act).

In the mean­time, the com­mit­tee is fo­cus­ing on im­prov­ing health in­form­a­tion tech­no­logy—an at­tempt at cre­at­ing a ma­jor med­ic­al-in­nov­a­tion bill both parties can sup­port, just like the chair­man and rank­ing mem­ber have done in the past.

What We're Following See More »
CDC Says 72,000 Died from Opioids Last Year
7 hours ago

"Drug overdoses killed about 72,000 Americans last year, a record number that reflects a rise of around 10 percent, according to new preliminary estimates from the Centers for Disease Control. The death toll is higher than the peak yearly death totals from H.I.V., car crashes or gun deaths. Analysts pointed to two major reasons for the increase: A growing number of Americans are using opioids, and drugs are becoming more deadly."

SEC Subpoenas Tesla Over Musk Tweet
7 hours ago

"The San Francisco office of the SEC has sent subpoenas to Tesla regarding its privatization plans and Musk’s statement to determine whether the billionaire inventor intentionally misled investors," according to a report on Fox Business. "Tesla, in response, has also hired two law firms, Paul, Weiss, Rifkin, Wharton & Garrison to help deal with the SEC, and Latham & Watkins to advise on privatization."

Trump Revokes Brennan's Security Clearance
9 hours ago

"President Trump on Wednesday revoked the security clearance of John O. Brennan, the former C.I.A. director under President Barack Obama, citing what he called Mr. Brennan’s “erratic” behavior. The White House had threatened last month to strip Mr. Brennan and two other Obama administration officials — Susan E. Rice, the former national security adviser; and James R. Clapper Jr., the former director of national intelligence — of their security clearances." Mr. Brennan has been highly critical of Trump on Twitter and in television appearances.

Successful Cyberattack Hit California Congressional Race
9 hours ago

The FBI have investigated "a series of cyberattacks over the past year that targeted a Democratic opponent of Rep. Dana Rohrabacher," widely seen as the "most pro-Russia and pro-Putin member of Congress." The hacks against his Democratic opponent, Hans Keirstead, "began in August 2017 with a spear-phishing attempt... sent to Keirstead’s work email address," which was ultimately successful. Later attacks focused on his twitter account, and "Keirstead's campaign’s website and hosting service." Keirstead fell "125 votes short of advancing to the general election in one of the narrowest margins of any congressional primary this year," and has since endorsed Rohrabacher's opponent Harley Rouda.

Manafort Case Moves to Closing Arguments
12 hours ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.