How Scientific Are Donald Trump’s Favorite Polls?

Some of the polls Trump thinks are respected truly are. Others, not so much.

AP
Oct. 19, 2015, 8 p.m.

Donald Trump really likes to talk polls.

Both on social media and in interviews, Trump frequently mentions his polling record, using polls by a host of organizations to make the case that he’s the unquestioned leader in the Republican presidential field.

But beyond just dropping numbers, Trump has weighed in on the caliber of specific polling agencies. He is quick to call these organizations “respected”—regardless of whether that label actually applies.

We asked polling experts to weigh in on five polls hailed by Trump and their methodologies.

Monmouth University

What Trump says:

Back in April, before he announced his campaign, Trump tweeted his surprise at the results of a Monmouth poll: “Wow, the respected Monmouth University poll has me ahead of most Republican candidates nationwide, and most people don’t think I’m running!”

What polling experts say:

On April 6, the day before Trump’s tweet, Monmouth released a national poll of GOP voters. That poll used random-digit dialing to reach voters nationwide—both on landlines and cell phones. The voters were then asked questions by a human, not a robot.

After being described the methodology, professor Jon Krosnick of Stanford University said the Monmouth poll was “state of the art.”

“They’re a good-quality, academic polling center,” says professor David Redlawsk, who teaches political science at Rutgers University and serves as the director of the Rutgers-Eagleton poll.

When FiveThirtyEight rated polling agencies for their methodologies and accuracies, Monmouth got an A–.

Suffolk University

What Trump says:

In June, Trump noted his second-place rank in New Hampshire, according to the “highly respected Suffolk University poll.”

What polling experts say:

The day before Trump’s tweet, Suffolk released a poll of New Hampshire Republican presidential-primary voters. That poll surveyed 500 “likely” Republican primary voters through live telephone interviews. The voters were reached on both cell phones and landlines.

Redlawsk says he thinks that the Suffolk poll is “a good, solid poll.”

“The evidence is that their polling is methodologically reasonable,” Redlawsk says. “They make the kind of methodological choices one should make.”

However, professor Cliff Zukin, who teaches public policy and political science—also at Rutgers—had problems with the way that Suffolk decided which participants were “likely” to vote in the election.

“Eighty-nine percent passed through their screen as a likely participant in the Republican primary. Laughable,” Zukin told National Journal in an email.  “At least two times too high, based on historical (high) turnout of about 40 percent.”

FiveThirtyEight gave the Suffolk poll a B rating.

The Drudge Report and Time

What Trump says:

On at least two occasions, Trump has cited Drudge and Time as a pair.

In August, the day after the first Republican presidential debate, Trump appeared on CNN, touting his victory in polls done by Drudge and Time.

“What’s better than Drudge? He’s a fantastic guy. What he’s built is unbelievably respected,” the business mogul said.

Time, Trump said, “is wonderful. And, you know, they did a poll. And in the poll, I was in the fifties against everybody else.”

In September, after the second Republican debate, Trump again turned to Time and Drudge polls: In a tweet, he cited his leads in both.

It appears that the Time poll Trump is referencing is a poll done on the magazine’s website after the second Republican presidential debate in September. (A spokesperson for Time said that “looks like” the poll Trump is referencing and that “those numbers line up with the tweet.”)

What polling experts say:

Both of these “polls” consist of single-question widgets embedded on the site pages. Anyone visiting the pages can participate. This method of opinion gathering, experts warn, makes them unreliable.

“The people who go to specific websites are not representative of the U.S. population in any way,” explains professor Brendan Nyhan, who teaches in the government department at Dartmouth University. 

“That’s not even a survey. There’s no sampling at all,” says Krosnick of these kinds of web polls. “There is no way to call that a survey because a survey needs to begin by defining a population, then drawing a sample systematically from the population, and asking questions of those individuals.”

“Anything that purports to be a poll that does not use some type of random sampling does not mean anything,” says Redlawsk.

Time acknowledged that its poll following the second Republican presidential debate was unscientific. That poll came with a disclaimer:

DISCLAIMER: This web poll is informal, not scientific. It reflects opinions of site visitors who voluntarily participate. Results may not represent the opinions of the public as a whole.

“I wouldn’t even call it a poll,” says Krosnick of Time’s poll. “It’s entertainment, not science.”

Both Drudge polls are closed, but the pair of Time polls remain open to website visitors as of this writing.

Zogby Analytics

What Trump says:

Also in September, Trump took to Twitter to complain about the lack of coverage of a poll done by a different organization: Zogby Analytics.

“New Zogby poll—highly respected—but the media won’t report it because it gives me an even bigger lead!” Trump tweeted.

Later in the day, he re-upped his concern that the poll was going uncovered: “Has the media picked up the new Zogby poll that was just put out? I doubt it!”

What polling experts say:

The day before Trump’s tweets, Zogby released a poll that did indicate that Trump had widened his lead after the second Republican presidential debate. However, while the company’s website lists the poll’s sample size and margin of error, it does not provide additional information on the way they were collected. An email to Zogby Analytics requesting more information on the poll’s methodology was not answered.

Redlawsk explains that polling agencies should be fully transparent with their methodologies. “Any poll where they don’t provide detailed methodological information should actually be ignored,” he said.

“Zogby Analytics has a track record of remarkably inaccurate preelection polls,” says Krosnick, noting that those inaccuracies are likely due to nonrandom sampling.

John Zogby, Zukin said, has “a poor reputation” in the scientific community. He described Zogby as “a marketer, and very good self-promoter, who has done some very poor work in the past.”

But to Trump, perhaps polling methodologies matter less than wins.

“I’m leading big in every poll and we are going to WIN!” Trump posted to Twitter on Oct. 10. “Remember, Trump NEVER gives up!”

What We're Following See More »
LOWER COURT HAD INVALIDATED LIFE SENTENCE
SCOTUS Will Hear DC Sniper Case
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to consider Virginia’s plea to reinstate the life-without-parole sentence of a man who as a teenager participated in sniper shootings that terrorized the Washington, D.C., region in 2002. The justices said they will take up the state’s appeal in the case of Lee Boyd Malvo, who was 17 when he and John Allen Muhammad fatally shot 10 people in Maryland, Virginia and Washington. Malvo was sentenced to life-without-parole terms in Virginia and in Maryland, and Muhammad was sentenced to death and was executed in 2009. Malvo was sentenced to four life terms for crimes he committed in Virginia. But the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled last year that while Malvo’s life-without-parole sentences were legal when they were imposed."

Source:
PROSECUTORS, DOT ARE INVOLVED
U.S. Grand Jury Seeks info on How 737 MAX Is Made
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Federal prosecutors and Department of Transportation officials are scrutinizing the development of Boeing Co.’s 737 MAX jetliners, according to people familiar with the matter, unusual inquiries that come amid probes of regulators’ safety approvals of the new plane. A grand jury in Washington, D.C., issued a broad subpoena dated March 11 to at least one person involved in the 737 MAX’s development, seeking related documents, including correspondence, emails and other messages."

Source:
HAS NOT ATTENDED HIGH-LEVEL MEETINGS OF LATE
MBS Stripped of Some Powers
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The heir to the Saudi throne has not attended a series of high-profile ministerial and diplomatic meetings in Saudi Arabia over the last fortnight and is alleged to have been stripped of some of his financial and economic authority, the Guardian has been told. The move to restrict, if only temporarily, the responsibilities of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is understood to have been revealed to a group of senior ministers earlier last week by his father, King Salman."

Source:
TURKISH MAN BEING SOUGHT
Mass Shooting in Dutch City of Utrecht
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS
AUTHORIZED TO UNLOCK PHONES
Feds Raided Broidy's Offices Last Year
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Federal authorities raided the office of Republican fundraiser Elliott Broidy last summer, seeking records related to his dealings with foreign officials and Trump administration associates, according to a sealed search warrant obtained by ProPublica. Agents were authorized to use the megadonor’s hands and face to unlock any phones that required fingerprint or facial scans."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login