A Newer, Softer David Vitter?

Vitter’s spent most of his time in the Senate as a conservative agitator on the margins. If elected governor some of that could change.

Sen. David Vitter in 2013.
National Journal
Oct. 18, 2015, 8 p.m.

Sen. Dav­id Vit­ter is in the fi­nal stages of his quest to be­come Louisi­ana’s next gov­ernor, a goal he’s framed as the cap­stone of his ca­reer and his last at­tempt at elec­ted of­fice. Des­pite some pub­lic polling show­ing him fa­cing a closer-than-ex­pec­ted race against his likely Demo­crat­ic op­pon­ent in a Novem­ber run­off, it re­mains un­likely Vit­ter will lose, which leads to the ques­tion: What kind of gov­ernor will Vit­ter be?

“There’s a lot of spec­u­la­tion in the state about what kind of a gov­ernor would Vit­ter be, be­cause it’s easi­er in the Sen­ate to be a bomb throw­er and a can­tan­ker­ous per­son, and that’s something we’re not really as used to in an ex­ec­ut­ive-type role,” said G. Pear­son Cross, a polit­ic­al sci­ence pro­fess­or at the Uni­versity of Louisi­ana at La­fay­ette.

Based on cam­paign rhet­or­ic, if Vit­ter is elec­ted he’s likely to re­main just as so­cially and fisc­ally con­ser­vat­ive as he’s been in Con­gress, but he has hin­ted at pos­sibly edging to­ward the cen­ter on some is­sues.

Hav­ing spent most of his two terms in the Sen­ate as one of the most con­ser­vat­ive mem­bers of the minor­ity party, Vit­ter is best known as a con­ser­vat­ive agit­at­or on is­sues like im­mig­ra­tion and health care. But when he launched his cam­paign for gov­ernor in Janu­ary, Vit­ter said that ul­ti­mately, “I be­lieve as our next gov­ernor I can have a big­ger im­pact,” not­ing that he’ll have “many more tools” at his dis­pos­al to pur­sue the kinds of changes he’s long sought. He also said he was run­ning “to take on the im­port­ant is­sues and make the hard de­cisions.” Hard de­cisions won’t be dif­fi­cult to find. Who­ever wins the Louisi­ana gov­ernor’s race will be stuck with the un­en­vi­able job of con­front­ing the state’s per­sist­ent budget prob­lems.

One ma­jor thread that’s likely to weave it­self in­to a po­ten­tial gov­ernor­ship is Vit­ter’s pro­cliv­ity for root­ing out cor­rup­tion and waste and strip­ping those in power of what he sees as un­fair perks and priv­ileges—a zeal that can at times seem over­bear­ing, but has also won him the sup­port of Louisi­anans. There is a pop­u­list streak that binds to­geth­er some seem­ingly dis­par­ate ef­forts throughout his ca­reer—like strip­ping mem­bers of Con­gress and their staff of spe­cial health sub­sidies and work­ing to curb ex­ec­ut­ive pay—that have led him to both tick off fel­low Re­pub­lic­ans and oc­ca­sion­ally forge un­likely al­li­ances with Demo­crats. On top of his re­cent ef­forts on hot-but­ton is­sues like sanc­tu­ary cit­ies and Planned Par­ent­hood, he’s also co­sponsored bills with Demo­crat­ic Sen. Sher­rod Brown to hold big banks ac­count­able for the mis­takes of the fin­an­cial crisis, and paired up this year with Demo­crat­ic Sen. Eliza­beth War­ren to cap the ex­ec­ut­ive pay of those at the gov­ern­ment-backed mort­gage lenders Fan­nie Mae and Fred­die Mac. In his cur­rent bid for gov­ernor, Vit­ter is rail­ing against money wasted on “thou­sands of un­ne­ces­sary state cars.”

In list­ing his top ac­com­plish­ments, Vit­ter is most likely to point to bi­par­tis­an ef­forts help­ful to Louisi­ana, like se­cur­ing loans and flood-in­sur­ance money to as­sist re­cov­ery ef­forts from Hur­ricane Kat­rina, or a wa­ter-re­sources bill he worked on with Demo­crat­ic Sen. Bar­bara Box­er.

“I have a long his­tory of chal­len­ging the status quo by re­fus­ing my Con­gres­sion­al pen­sion and fight­ing to pass terms lim­its, elim­in­ate the Obama­care ex­emp­tion for Con­gress, and end auto­mat­ic pay raises,” Vit­ter said in a state­ment to Na­tion­al Journ­al. “Too many politi­cians are liv­ing on a dif­fer­ent plan­et, and we need to bring them back down to earth in or­der to ef­fect­ively gov­ern. That’s how I al­ways have, and al­ways will lead.” 

These ef­forts have al­tern­at­ively been viewed as right­eous or ri­dicu­lous, or some­times fruit­less de­pend­ing on the cause. But they stem from the same im­pulse, one that will guide him if elec­ted gov­ernor.

Op­er­at­ing as one of the most con­ser­vat­ive mem­bers of the minor­ity party in the Sen­ate, Vit­ter hasn’t been in­teg­ral to many high-pro­file budget or policy de­bates in re­cent years. But that would change if he’s elec­ted gov­ernor and as­signed to work with a state le­gis­lature over­whelm­ingly con­trolled by Re­pub­lic­ans. By most ap­pear­ances, Vit­ter has bet­ter re­la­tion­ships with mem­bers of the Louisi­ana le­gis­lature than he does with some col­leagues in the Sen­ate, which could come in handy when tough votes are re­quired to ad­dress the state’s budget prob­lems. At the very least, Vit­ter’s on bet­ter terms with loc­al Re­pub­lic­ans than out­go­ing Gov. Bobby Jin­dal.

“You couldn’t have worse. Jin­dal had ter­rible re­la­tions with the le­gis­lature, mostly be­cause he just ig­nored them,” Cross said.

Vit­ter stayed in­volved in state polit­ics while in Con­gress. He formed the Louisi­ana Com­mit­tee for a Re­pub­lic­an Ma­jor­ity in 2005 to help elect con­ser­vat­ives to the le­gis­lature, and has be­come act­ive once again throughout his gubernat­ori­al cam­paign. His cam­paign or­gan­ized a dozen policy-fo­cused lead­er­ship for­ums between last fall and spring, and each were at­ten­ded by at least a hand­ful of le­gis­lat­ors—most of whom, his cam­paign be­lieves, have his per­son­al cell num­ber. Vit­ter even went so far as to an­nounce his cell-phone num­ber to a crowd at a loc­al meet­ing this sum­mer in or­der to em­phas­ize his ac­cess­ib­il­ity re­l­at­ive to Jin­dal. (That ac­cess­ib­il­ity doesn’t ne­ces­sar­ily ex­tend to the press, which he’s no­tori­ously dodged since his dec­ade-old pros­ti­tu­tion scan­dal. The lead­er­ship for­ums were closed to the press and the pub­lic.)

“Most would say he’s been very suc­cess­ful, es­pe­cially with Re­pub­lic­ans, at at­tempt­ing to al­lay those fears that he’s a rabble rouser and is not go­ing to be able to work with any­one,” said Bernie Pin­son­at, a poll­ster for the Bat­on Rouge-based South­ern Me­dia & Opin­ion Re­search.

It also re­mains pos­sible that Vit­ter the gov­ernor could be more mod­er­ate, or at least more will­ing to com­prom­ise on some is­sues than Vit­ter the sen­at­or. When he first an­nounced his in­ten­tion to run for gov­ernor in 2014, Vit­ter looked ready to run on a more mod­er­ate plat­form. He came out in sup­port of Com­mon Core, and talked early on about po­ten­tially ac­cept­ing Medi­caid ex­pan­sion. But as he’s fought off small in­roads made by one Re­pub­lic­an op­pon­ent seek­ing to com­pete for the title of “most con­ser­vat­ive,” Vit­ter’s backed off. He re­versed him­self on Com­mon Core, and made an ag­gress­ive push in re­cent weeks to re­mind voters of his con­ser­vat­ive bona fides on is­sues like abor­tion, guns, and food stamps. He has ex­pressed open­ness, however, to re­form­ing a costly state-col­lege schol­ar­ship pro­gram, which puts him on the op­pos­ite side of the is­sue from Jin­dal. And des­pite his repu­ta­tion as an anti-Obama­care cru­sader in Con­gress, Vit­ter has stuck by his open­ness to ac­cept­ing fed­er­al money for Medi­caid ex­pan­sion un­der cer­tain con­di­tions.

“If he did that, it would be a big deal. That would be a real de­par­ture from where we were with Gov­ernor Jin­dal,” Cross said. “That’s the thing about Vit­ter—he’s a little bit of a wild card oc­ca­sion­ally.”  

What We're Following See More »
OVER SEXUAL HARASSMENT ALLEGATIONS
House Ethics Committee Sanctions Meadows, Kihuen
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

The House Ethics Committee has formally sanctioned Reps. Mark Meadows and Ruben Kihuen over sexual harassment-related allegations. "Meadows was found to have violated House rules 'by failing to take appropriate steps to ensure that his House office was free from discrimination and any perception of discrimination.'" Meadows will have to pay over $40,000 to cover the cost of former chief of staff Kenny West's salary, who remained on his payroll even after Meadows' learned "of credible harassment allegations against the former aide. ... Kihuen, who announced his retirement as the #MeToo movement swept Capitol Hill last year, was found to have 'made persistent and unwanted advances towards women who were required to interact with him as part of their professional responsibilities.'"

Source:
EX-COAL LOBBYIST, FORMER #2
Trump To Nominate Andrew Wheeler To Lead EPA
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"President Trump said he plans to nominate Andrew Wheeler, acting head of the Environmental Protection Agency, to be the EPA's Senate-confirmed administrator." Wheeler took over as acting administrator in July, "when then-EPA chief Scott Pruitt resigned amid numerous spending and ethics scandals. ... Before working for the government, Wheeler was a lobbyist and lawyer for energy companies such as coal mining giant Murray Energy Corp."

Source:
BUT NOT SUBMITTED THEM
Trump Says He's Completed Answers to Mueller's Questions
3 hours ago
THE LATEST
CORNYN, GRAHAM NEXT IN LINE
Grassley Will Chair Judiciary Committee, Leave Finance
5 hours ago
THE LATEST
RULES NOW ENTER PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
DeVos Overhauls Guidance to Colleges on Sex Misconduct Cases
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos has updated the Obama administration's controversial rules on how colleges handle claims of sexual misconduct by students under Title IX. "The proposed new rules aim to significantly enhance legal protections for the accused, and reflect a sentiment expressed personally by President Trump that men are being unfairly presumed guilty." The rules, which must undergo a public comment period, would allow schools to elevate the burden of proof in sex cases to "clear and convincing evidence." They would also permit cross-examination, and lift time limits on investigations.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login