Q&A

The U.S. Is Not “˜Credit-Positive’

If the debt-ceiling debate doesn’t bring real reform, says the S&P analyst in charge of grading government creditworthiness, get ready for another downgrade.

Assessor: Swann
©HENRY FEATHER 2013-all rights reserved
Stacy Kaper
Add to Briefcase
Stacy Kaper
May 16, 2013, 4 p.m.

The U.S. stat­utory debt lim­it ex­pires May 18, and the Treas­ury De­part­ment pre­dicts it can pay the bills only un­til Labor Day, which means the clock is again tick­ing for law­makers to act. Nikola Swann, Stand­ard & Poor’s top ana­lyst for the U.S. cred­it rat­ing, warns that poli­cy­makers do not ap­pear any closer to en­sur­ing fisc­al sta­bil­ity than they were nearly two years ago when the agency cut Amer­ica’s per­fect score. Ed­ited ex­cerpts of his con­ver­sa­tion with Na­tion­al Journ­al fol­low.

NJ Has Con­gress learned any les­sons from the 2011 down­grade?

SWANN We have not seen any strong evid­ence that the polit­ic­al sys­tem as a whole is more ef­fect­ive, more stable, or more pre­dict­able than we thought it was in 2011. There does seem to be, es­pe­cially in re­cent years, an over­all trend in the U.S. to ef­fect­ively make ma­jor policy de­cisions at the last mo­ment in a crisis set­ting. We don’t see that as cred­it-pos­it­ive.

NJ What do law­makers need to do to avoid fur­ther down­grades?

SWANN The neg­at­ive out­look primar­ily is about the risks we see that U.S. poli­cy­makers may not reach an agree­ment on how to con­sol­id­ate fisc­ally. At the very least, we need an agree­ment that looks out five years. Also, we would need for that agree­ment to be large enough to make a dif­fer­ence — something that would keep the debt-to-GDP ra­tios from con­tinu­ing to rise as they have been for most of the past 10 years. And, thirdly, we would have to view this plan as cred­ible, mean­ing we would have to see a reas­on­able basis for be­liev­ing that this plan would ac­tu­ally be im­ple­men­ted. The best proof would be if you had, at very least, a sub­stan­tial share of the law­makers from both parties agree on this plan, be­cause then you have some reas­on to think that even after an elec­tion, this plan would could keep go­ing.

NJ Do ef­forts in the House to pri­or­it­ize pay­ments provide enough sta­bil­ity?

SWANN If you are us­ing the le­gis­la­tion, you are ne­ces­sar­ily right at the razor edge. You could very well be hav­ing sig­ni­fic­ant tur­bu­lence in the eco­nomy and in fin­an­cial mar­kets. This does not sound like a very com­fort­able scen­ario. So the point is, in a mech­an­ic­al sense, yes, such le­gis­la­tion could po­ten­tially help avoid de­fault, but that doesn’t mean this over­all scen­ario would not get so rocky that we wouldn’t down­grade from AA-plus any­way.

NJ How far in ad­vance of the debt-lim­it dead­line does Con­gress need to act to make you com­fort­able?

SWANN Our primary fo­cus is on the longer-term dy­nam­ic. Of course, the debt-ceil­ing de­bate of late has provided some in­cre­ment­al in­form­a­tion about how the longer-term dy­nam­ics are go­ing. I don’t think we would view it as help­ful for us to in­ject an ad­di­tion­al dead­line in­to the de­bate. But it is cer­tainly true that the fur­ther the U.S. can get away from mak­ing im­port­ant de­cisions — es­pe­cially about pub­lic fin­ances — at the last minute, in a crisis, the more that would help the cred­it rat­ing.

NJ What’s a com­mon mis­con­cep­tion about how rat­ings work?

SWANN If the Treas­ury were to de­fault on even one pay­ment, prin­cip­al or in­terest, on mar­ket debt, not only would we down­grade but the rat­ing would go to D, be­cause that is the rat­ing for someone who is in de­fault. Secondly, if we were to reach a situ­ation where we thought there was a high like­li­hood of de­fault — and this could hap­pen im­min­ently — then the most likely rat­ing and out­look would be a CCC with a cred­it watch neg­at­ive. So we are talk­ing about a level that is many notches be­low AA-plus.

NJ The last down­grade did not have a last­ing mar­ket ef­fect. What would an­oth­er mean?

SWANN We really can’t speak for in­vestors, but in 2011 when we went to a neg­at­ive out­look and then to AA-plus and kept the neg­at­ive out­look, two of the oth­er ma­jor rat­ing agen­cies had not at that point changed any­thing about their rat­ings or out­looks about the U.S. Since then, they have changed their out­look. So when you are think­ing about the scen­ari­os, it could po­ten­tially make more of a dif­fer­ence if you have more than one, or pos­sibly even three, rat­ing agen­cies hav­ing more-sim­il­ar opin­ions.

NJ Would it make sense to do away with the debt ceil­ing?

SWANN S&P rates over 120 sov­er­eign gov­ern­ments, in­clud­ing all of the wealthy de­veloped ones. Of those, there are very few that have any­thing sim­il­ar to the U.S. debt ceil­ing. Of those coun­tries that do have some kind of le­gis­lated lim­it on the amount of debt, that lim­it is set as part of the budget-set­ting pro­cess. It al­most nev­er is di­vided the way it is in the U.S. We don’t think it is help­ful to cred­it qual­ity.

What We're Following See More »
STAKES ARE HIGH
Debate Could Sway One-Third of Voters
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."

Source:
YOU DON’T BRING ME FLOWERS ANYMORE
Gennifer Flowers May Not Appear After All
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."

Source:
HAS BEEN OFF OF NEWSCASTS FOR A WEEK
For First Debate, Holt Called on NBC Experts for Prep
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

NBC's Lester Holt hasn't hosted the "Nightly News" since Tuesday, as he's prepped for moderating the first presidential debate tonight—and the first of his career. He's called on a host of NBC talent to help him, namely NBC News and MSNBC chairman Andy Lack; NBC News president Deborah Turness; the news division's senior vice president of editorial, Janelle Rodriguez; "Nightly News" producer Sam Singal, "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd, senior political editor Mark Murray and political editor Carrie Dann. But during the debate itself, the only person in Holt's earpiece will be longtime debate producer Marty Slutsky.

Source:
WHITE HOUSE PROMISES VETO
House Votes to Bar Cash Payments to Iran
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed legislation late Thursday that would prohibit the federal government from making any cash payments to Iran, in protest of President Obama's recently discovered decision to pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash in January. And while the White House has said Obama would veto the bill, 16 Democrats joined with Republicans to pass the measure, 254-163."

Source:
NO SURPRISE
Trump Eschewing Briefing Materials in Debate Prep
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shun­ning tra­di­tion­al de­bate pre­par­a­tions, but has been watch­ing video of…Clin­ton’s best and worst de­bate mo­ments, look­ing for her vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies.” Trump “has paid only curs­ory at­ten­tion to brief­ing ma­ter­i­als. He has re­fused to use lecterns in mock de­bate ses­sions des­pite the ur­ging of his ad­visers. He prefers spit­balling ideas with his team rather than hon­ing them in­to crisp, two-minute an­swers.”

Source:
×