Scott Walker’s Gift to Ron Johnson

The Wisconsin governor’s campaign built a wealth of voter data and volunteer enthusiasm that could help save the endangered senator’s 2016 campaign.

Sen. Ron Johnson
Bloomberg AFP/Getty
Alex Roarty
Add to Briefcase
Alex Roarty
Oct. 6, 2015, 8 p.m.

The elec­tion is more than a year away, but Sen. Ron John­son’s reelec­tion cam­paign in Demo­crat­ic-lean­ing Wis­con­sin already faces stiff head­winds and, ac­cord­ing to one re­cent reput­able sur­vey, a double-di­git polling de­fi­cit against Russ Fein­gold, the former sen­at­or who lost his seat to John­son in the 2010 Re­pub­lic­an wave.

But top of­fi­cials with John­son’s cam­paign are con­fid­ent they can make up the gap with the help of a secret weapon—one they in­her­ited from Scott Walk­er.

The Wis­con­sin gov­ernor, work­ing in con­junc­tion with the Re­pub­lic­an Party of Wis­con­sin, built a for­mid­able polit­ic­al ma­chine on the way to win­ning three statewide elec­tions from 2010 to 2014. And in­stead of scut­tling the op­er­a­tion after Walk­er won his second term last year, he de­cided to hand over con­trol of it—in­clud­ing me­tic­u­lously built vo­lun­teer lists and highly prized pro­files of the Wis­con­sin elect­or­ate—to John­son.

Even for cam­paigns in­side the same party, Walk­er’s ges­ture showed an un­usu­al de­gree of co­oper­a­tion. John­son and Walk­er of­fi­cials alike say it gives the sen­at­or a sig­ni­fic­ant head start on build­ing his own polit­ic­al in­fra­struc­ture. They hope it al­lows John­son to build on the gov­ernor’s suc­cesses win­ning a blue state and trans­late it to a pres­id­en­tial-elec­tion year when John­son needs every last bit of help to tilt the Sen­ate race back in his fa­vor.

“That op­er­a­tion has just flipped over to Ron John­son,” said Betsy Ankney, John­son’s cam­paign man­ager. “It’s not like they shut everything down after ’14 and said, ‘All right, every­body, good work; we’ll see you in a year and a half.’”

“This is truly a situ­ation where Ron John­son in­her­ited the strength and re­sources of the Re­pub­lic­an Party of Wis­con­sin and Scott Walk­er,” said Joe Fad­ness, former ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Wis­con­sin GOP. “The jer­seys are already on,” he ad­ded, re­fer­ring to the state’s Re­pub­lic­an vo­lun­teers.

Not one week after Elec­tion Day 2014, Re­pub­lic­an Party of Wis­con­sin of­fi­cials met with mem­bers of the John­son cam­paign to dis­cuss the trans­ition. By Janu­ary, the party had six of­fices staffed up across the state, bent on main­tain­ing the net­work of staffers and vo­lun­teers who had amassed to power Walk­er’s ground game months be­fore in a close, na­tion­ally watched race.

Speed was im­port­ant, Re­pub­lic­an of­fi­cials said, not only to give John­son a jump-start on the Demo­crats but also to main­tain and re­fo­cus the en­thu­si­asm of Walk­er vo­lun­teers in­stead of al­low­ing it to dis­sip­ate dur­ing a polit­ic­al off-year. Already, they say, those vo­lun­teers have been hard at work drum­ming up sup­port for John­son at a time when many cam­paigns might just be as­sem­bling their teams.

But the Walk­er cam­paign’s most im­port­ant con­tri­bu­tion might have been its voter data­base. Walk­er’s op­er­a­tion built its own in-house data­base that as­sembled in­form­a­tion gathered dur­ing his 2010 gubernat­ori­al race and sub­sequent re­call, and reams of con­sumer data pur­chased by the cam­paign.

In the end, Walk­er’s cam­paign had ad­ded an ad­di­tion­al 800,000 data points, ac­cord­ing to one seni­or GOP of­fi­cial, in­clud­ing in­form­a­tion gained from in­di­vidu­al voter con­tacts that auto­mat­ic­ally up­dated mod­els of the Wis­con­sin elect­or­ate.

See­ing how voters were re­act­ing in real time paid di­vidends for the cam­paign, said Mat­thew Oczkowski, the chief di­git­al of­ficer for Walk­er’s 2014 race, be­cause it let cam­paign strategists ad­just quickly to new de­vel­op­ments.  In one case, when Demo­crat­ic Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Debbie Wasser­man Schultz said Walk­er “has giv­en wo­men the back of his hand” dur­ing a cam­paign stop in Mil­wau­kee, the cam­paign saw the neg­at­ive ef­fect it had on fe­male voters.  

Without the mod­els built off that data­base, the cam­paign would have had to rely on polls that can take days to show res­ults—or the gut feel­ing of a cam­paign strategist.

It also gave the Walk­er cam­paign in­sights on which voters it ran weak­est with—in­clud­ing some in­tel­li­gence that de­fied con­ven­tion­al wis­dom. The cam­paign real­ized, Oczkowski said, that it was per­form­ing well in the Fox River Val­ley, a tra­di­tion­al Wis­con­sin battle­ground that runs through the cent­ral and east­ern part of the state. It was strug­gling, however, with small-town voters who had once been strong Walk­er sup­port­ers but thought the gov­ernor’s tone in his reelec­tion cam­paign had been too harsh.

“We star­ted to learn quickly that it wasn’t so much these tra­di­tion­al battle­grounds that we were los­ing, but we were los­ing a lot of folks in small towns,” Oczkowski said. “… Those are the kind of folks you have to win to make up the num­bers you lose in the city of Mil­wau­kee and city of Madis­on. Once we got back to ba­sics, and got the gov­ernor dir­ect-to-cam­era talk­ing about is­sues that mat­ter most in rur­al com­munit­ies, we star­ted to bring those folks back.”

Ul­ti­mately, the data proved ac­cur­ate. Oczkowski said the cam­paign’s res­ults pro­jec­tion three weeks be­fore Elec­tion Day missed the mar­gin of vic­tory by just four-tenths of a per­cent­age point.

Cer­tainly, re­cent elec­tions are re­plete with ill-fated claims that a cam­paign has found the for­mula that can change the course of an elec­tion. Last year, Sen­ate Demo­crats touted their “Ban­nock Street Pro­ject,” a mul­ti­mil­lion-dol­lar, data-heavy ef­fort that was sup­posed to help re­shape the elect­or­ate in a hand­ful of key battle­grounds. Boast­ful talk of the op­er­a­tion all but ceased after the party lost nine Sen­ate seats last year.

A spokes­man for the Wis­con­sin Demo­crat­ic Party said Re­pub­lic­ans are not alone in tak­ing ad­vant­age of re­sources from re­cent cam­paigns. Fein­gold’s cam­paign, for in­stance, has in­her­ited voter files built and used when Sen. Tammy Bald­win knocked off former Gov. Tommy Thompson in the 2012 elec­tion.

For all the talk from Re­pub­lic­ans, Demo­crats are skep­tic­al that after so many tough fights, either party can claim to pos­sess a su­per­i­or polit­ic­al ma­chine.

“Wis­con­sin has had a lot of elect­or­al fights in the last six years,” said Mike Tate, former chair­man of the Wis­con­sin Demo­crat­ic Party. “It is a mis­take for any side to im­ply any state party ap­par­at­us has a sig­ni­fic­ant ad­vant­age over the oth­er. Be­cause they’re both pretty battle tested.”

Walk­er won, Tate ad­ded, be­cause the fun­da­ment­als of his races were fa­vor­able—not be­cause of a stronger-than-av­er­age polit­ic­al op­er­a­tion.

“Scott Walk­er did not win reelec­tion in 2014 be­cause of some ad­vant­age that he or the Re­pub­lic­an Party had in terms of data, or turnout mech­an­ism, or abil­ity try to reach voters on­line, or through some sort of secret sauce,” Tate said. “They won be­cause it was a wave year and it’s very dif­fi­cult to un­seat an in­cum­bent gov­ernor.”

What We're Following See More »
BEFORE JULY 4 RECESS
Cornyn Says Health Vote Needed This Week
26 minutes ago
THE LATEST
AS OF JULY 1
State Dept. Anti-Semitism Office Will be Unstaffed
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Its remaining two staffers, each working half-time or less, would be reassigned as of that date. The Trump administration, which has yet to name an envoy to head the office, would not comment on the staffing change. At full staffing, the office employs a full-time envoy and the equivalent of three full-time staffers."

Source:
MEANWHILE, SOME PARTS ALLOWED TO TAKE EFFECT
SCOTUS Will Hear Travel Ban
2 hours ago
THE LATEST
"The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear the government’s appeal of lower court rulings blocking the immigration order from taking effect nationwide. The court also granted the government's request to reinstate part of Trump's travel ban, which would affect people from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. As a result of the decision, people who do not have a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States would be barred from entry."
Source:
WILL NOT HEAR CONCEALED-CARRY CASE
SOCTUS Accepts Same-Sex Wedding Cake Case
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Supreme Court decided Monday to hear a case involving a Colorado baker's refusal to design and make a cake for a same-sex marriage. The baker, Jake Phillips, declined to make the custom cake and said it conflicted with his religious beliefs. The Colorado Civil Rights Commission decided that Phillips' actions amounted to sexual orientation discrimination under the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act." Separately, the Court will not hear Peruta v. California, on "whether the Second Amendment gives people the right to carry handguns outside the home for self-defense, including concealed carry when open carry is forbidden by state law."

Source:
NO LONGER HEADING TO THE UN
Kislyak Being Recalled to Russia
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Ending one the most turbulent tenures of a Washington-based ambassador in recent memory, the Kremlin has decided to recall Ambassador to the United States Sergey Kislyak, three individuals familiar with the decision told BuzzFeed News. The decision to bring Kislyak back to Russia rather than appoint him to a senior position at the United Nations in New York, as several outlets previously reported, comes amid investigations by the FBI and Congress into the 66-year-old diplomat’s contacts with President Donald Trump’s top aides during the 2016 presidential campaign."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login