White House

Facing Long Odds, an Angered Obama Vows Another Try on Gun Regulation

A president famed for his cool was visibly shaken; a politician noted for his calculation was ready for a fight he is likely to lose.

Mark Wilson AFP/Getty
Add to Briefcase
George E. Condon Jr.
Oct. 1, 2015, 8:18 p.m.

Amer­ic­ans saw an angry and frus­trated pres­id­ent Thursday even­ing, a pres­id­ent who has reached his break­ing point as yet more in­no­cent vic­tims of gun vi­ol­ence are coun­ted and yet more fu­ner­als are planned. For the 15th time in his ten­ure, Pres­id­ent Obama had to face the cam­er­as to some­how lead the na­tion in griev­ing the carnage left in the wake of a lone gun­man.

As he did the pre­vi­ous 14 times, he offered con­dol­ences to the griev­ing, pray­ers for the fallen, and in­vest­ig­a­tions for the facts. But gone this time was the sub­dued resig­na­tion that polit­ics in Wash­ing­ton and a hos­tile Con­gress keep him from go­ing fur­ther. This time, he vowed to go against those odds in a des­per­ate bid to make sure that nev­er again will he have to come to the White House brief­ing room to make what he bit­terly de­scribed as a now-routine speech.

A pres­id­ent famed for his cool was vis­ibly shaken; a politi­cian noted for his cal­cu­la­tion was ready for a fight he is likely to lose; a speak­er no­tori­ous for his fond­ness of the tele­prompt­er was quick to ig­nore his pre­pared re­marks and speak mostly from the heart. The frus­tra­tion was palp­able and ob­vi­ous through the long pauses, the grim de­mean­or, and the ap­peals to fel­low cit­izens he prays share his de­term­in­a­tion.

He has tried be­fore to change gun laws and didn’t deny that he may fail in this latest bid to pass laws mak­ing mass shoot­ings less likely. But he made clear that this is a fight he is eager to wage in his re­main­ing 15 months in of­fice. It is a battle he enters with his eyes open, already an­ti­cip­at­ing the press re­leases, the calls for more cit­izens to be armed, the cri­ti­cism that he is some­how politi­ciz­ing something that should be kept out of polit­ics.

His re­sponse was es­sen­tially what his pre­de­cessor once fam­ously de­clared: “Bring it on.” He all but dared the Na­tion­al Rifle As­so­ci­ation and its al­lies in Con­gress to op­pose him, out­right ap­peal­ing to gun own­ers across the coun­try to join his cru­sade. Mock­ing the well-prac­ticed ar­gu­ments against re­strict­ive gun laws, an ex­as­per­ated Obama asked, “Does any­body really be­lieve that?”

Noth­ing seemed to frus­trate the pres­id­ent more than that he was fol­low­ing an oh-so-fa­mil­i­ar script. This time, it was Umpqua Com­munity Col­lege in Ore­gon. But he had the script after Sandy Hook and Fort Hood, Bing­hamton and Au­rora, the Navy Yard and Char­le­ston. That he was once again speak­ing for a com­munity be­numbed by a bloody ram­page by a man with a private ar­sen­al of weapons, angered him. “This has be­come routine,” he com­plained. “The re­port­ing is routine. My re­sponse here at this po­di­um ends up be­ing routine. The con­ver­sa­tion and the af­ter­math of it, we’ve be­come numb to this.”

He knows that this routine in­cludes the push­back to what he is pro­pos­ing, a power­ful gun lobby that will ar­gue guns can­not be blamed for the in­san­ity of in­di­vidu­als, that gun own­er­ship is a con­sti­tu­tion­al right. An­ti­cip­at­ing that, he ar­gued, “We are not the only coun­try on Earth that has people with men­tal ill­nesses or want to do harm to oth­er people. We are the only ad­vanced coun­try on Earth that sees these kinds of mass shoot­ings every few months.”

Be­fore re­turn­ing to his pre­pared re­marks, he set a goal for his re­main­ing time in of­fice. “I hope and pray that I don’t have to come out again dur­ing my ten­ure as pres­id­ent to of­fer my con­dol­ences to fam­il­ies in these cir­cum­stances.” But he has been through this too many times and he seems to know bet­ter. It was the one mo­ment where sad resig­na­tion briefly sup­planted the an­ger. “Based on my ex­per­i­ence as pres­id­ent, I can’t guar­an­tee that. And that’s ter­rible to say.” Then the an­ger and res­ol­u­tion re­turned to his voice when he de­clared, “It can change.”

The months to come will de­term­ine if pres­id­en­tial fury will work any bet­ter than his past, more-con­ven­tion­al lob­by­ing and speech­mak­ing.

‘We Collectively Are Answerable To Those Families’


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.