Grassley Wants “Clarity” From FBI on Hillary Clinton’s Recovered Emails

The Senate Judiciary chairman said new revelations bolster the case for an “independent authority” to search records.

Sen. Chuck Grassley
Bloomberg AFP/Getty
Ben Geman
Add to Briefcase
Ben Geman
Sept. 23, 2015, 8 p.m.

Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee Chair­man Chuck Grass­ley said re­ports that the FBI has re­covered emails de­leted from Hil­lary Clin­ton’s per­son­al serv­er re­in­force the need for a third-party search for mes­sages.

“The FBI should … provide clar­ity on how it will handle the emails now that they have been re­covered from the serv­er. Al­low­ing an in­de­pend­ent au­thor­ity to search for re­cords that were re­ques­ted by Con­gress, the In­spect­or Gen­er­al, the press, and the pub­lic years ago, and then provid­ing the re­cords to the ap­pro­pri­ate re­questers, would be a wel­come move in trans­par­ency,” Grass­ley said in a state­ment Wed­nes­day.

Grass­ley’s com­ments fol­low a widely cir­cu­lated Bloomberg re­port that the FBI, which is prob­ing the se­cur­ity of the un­usu­al email setup, has “re­covered per­son­al and work-re­lated e-mails from the private com­puter serv­er used by Hil­lary Clin­ton dur­ing her time as sec­ret­ary of state.” The New York Times, cit­ing un­named gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials, also re­por­ted on the re­cov­ery of de­leted mes­sages.

Grass­ley is frus­trated with a let­ter he re­ceived from the Justice De­part­ment Tues­day that de­clines to con­firm its in­vest­ig­a­tion of Clin­ton’s email serv­er, which was promp­ted by con­cerns about the pres­ence of clas­si­fied in­form­a­tion. Justice sim­il­arly would not re­spond to sev­er­al ques­tions from Grass­ley and Sen­ate Home­land Se­cur­ity Com­mit­tee Chair­man Ron John­son about Bry­an Pagliano, the former Clin­ton aide who helped set up her serv­er. Grass­ley and John­son have been ex­plor­ing the pos­sib­il­ity of provid­ing im­munity for Pagliano in or­der to seek in­form­a­tion from him.

“The Justice De­part­ment is giv­ing us less in­form­a­tion than nor­mal when they should be giv­ing us more, so that we can make an in­formed de­cision about wheth­er to seek an im­munity or­der. You know it is get­ting a little ab­surd when someone at the Justice De­part­ment is ap­par­ently leak­ing de­tails to the press about an in­vest­ig­a­tion that the de­part­ment of­fi­cially re­fuses to ad­mit to Con­gress that it is con­duct­ing,” Grass­ley said.

It is at least the second time this week that Grass­ley has signaled frus­tra­tion with the Justice De­part­ment’s re­fus­al to share in­form­a­tion about its probe. He told Politico that the FBI is “be­hav­ing like it’s above the law” after it re­buffed a judge’s re­quest for in­form­a­tion.

Clin­ton has said she de­leted roughly 30,000 emails that her team de­cided were per­son­al in nature. She turned over roughly the same num­ber of work-re­lated emails late last year to the State De­part­ment, which it has been pub­licly re­leas­ing—some with heavy re­dac­tions—in monthly batches un­der a court or­der.

Clin­ton’s cam­paign did not im­me­di­ately re­spond to a re­quest for com­ment for this story.

Grass­ley, who has stepped up his probe of Clin­ton’s email ar­range­ment, also said he plans to deep­en his in­quiry fol­low­ing the re­ports of the re­cov­ery of de­leted mes­sages.

“In light of the de­tails re­por­ted in the me­dia, the com­mit­tee will be seek­ing more in­form­a­tion about the State De­part­ment’s at­tempts to re­gain pos­ses­sion of the email re­cords that should have re­mained at the State De­part­ment in the first place,” he said.

Grass­ley is not the only Re­pub­lic­an to call for some kind of third-party re­view of Clin­ton’s mes­sages. Rep. Trey Gowdy, chair­man of House Se­lect Com­mit­tee on Benghazi, has sim­il­arly called for such a step in the past.

However, Gowdy said through an aide that he’s not seek­ing in­form­a­tion from the FBI. “Chair­man Gowdy has not asked the FBI about its in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to Sec­ret­ary Clin­ton’s un­usu­al and un­pre­ced­en­ted email ar­range­ment nor has the Bur­eau offered a brief­ing to the com­mit­tee,” spokes­man Jamal Ware said in re­sponse to a ques­tion about the pub­lished re­ports on the FBI’s re­cov­ery of emails.

What We're Following See More »
Trump Drops Ultimatum on Healthcare
8 hours ago

"President Trump delivered an ultimatum to House Republicans on Thursday night: Vote to approve the measure to overhaul the nation’s health-care system on the House floor Friday, or reject it and the president will move on to his other legislative priorities." Passage remains far from certain, however, even with a 3pm Friday vote scheduled.

Trump’s SEC Chair Nominee Faces Tough Questioning
14 hours ago

Jay Clayton, Donald Trump's nominee to lead the Securities and Exchange Commission, was grilled today during his hearing in front of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. In question were his extensive ties to Wall Street and his potential conflicts of interest. During his hearing, Clayton promised he would not show favoritism to anyone. Clayton's financial disclosure revealed that Clayton "raked in $7.6 million in the year leading up to his nomination, buoyed by a client roster that included big banks such as Goldman Sachs. President Donald Trump has picked Goldman alums for several regulatory roles in his administration."

Health Vote Postponed
14 hours ago
Senators Press Sonny Perdue on Budget Cuts
15 hours ago

"Former Georgia governor Sonny Perdue, President Trump’s pick to lead the Agriculture Department, faced pointed questions about the administration’s proposed cuts to rural assistance programs during his otherwise friendly Senate confirmation hearing Thursday. Throughout the hearing, Perdue affirmed his commitment to several programs that could face cuts due to Trump’s budget: the Rural Utilities Service; the Natural Resource Conservation Center; and various agricultural research programs," even as the president's budget would cut his agency by 20 percent.

No Deal on Healthcare
16 hours ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.