European Lawmakers Scold U.S. for Levying Charges of Digital Protectionism

“The political debates on the way forward are not a ‘Transatlantic rift’ and should not be made into one,” members of the European Parliament wrote.

Google headquarters in Mountain View, California.
Justin Sullivan AFP/Getty
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
Sept. 22, 2015, 12:50 p.m.

BER­LIN—European law­makers are re­buff­ing charges from U.S. politi­cians that the con­tin­ent is en­ga­ging in sys­tem­at­ic “di­git­al pro­tec­tion­ism” in­ten­ded to thwart Sil­ic­on Val­ley’s glob­al dom­in­ance, ar­guing that talk of a “Transat­lantic rift” on data is­sues is over­blown des­pite on­go­ing reg­u­lat­ory chal­lenges for tech firms like Google and Face­book.

In a signed state­ment dated Monday but not yet of­fi­cially re­leased pub­licly, more than 50 mem­bers of the European Par­lia­ment say they are “sur­prised and con­cerned about the strong state­ments com­ing from U.S. sources about reg­u­lat­ory and le­gis­lat­ive pro­pos­als on the di­git­al agenda for the [European Uni­on].”

The state­ment, ob­tained from a tech­no­logy in­dustry source, calls out Pres­id­ent Obama by name be­fore adding: “The polit­ic­al de­bates on the way for­ward are not a ‘Transat­lantic rift’ and should not be made in­to one. Rather they rep­res­ent dif­fer­ent views and be­liefs that run right through our so­ci­et­ies.”

The re­buke comes just a day after France’s data-pri­vacy reg­u­lat­or re­jec­ted an ap­peal by Google that tried to lim­it the coun­try’s de­mand that Europe’s “right to be for­got­ten” from search in­dexes be ex­ten­ded glob­ally to all of Google’s do­mains. It also ar­rives just a month after Google re­spon­ded to Europe’s long-run­ning an­ti­trust probe of the search king, sharply re­but­ting the 28-mem­ber bloc’s ac­cus­a­tions as “wrong as a mat­ter of fact, law, and eco­nom­ics.”

U.S. law­makers have long sug­ges­ted that European reg­u­lat­ors are at­tempt­ing to use red tape and leg­al chal­lenges to wage war on Amer­ic­an tech gi­ants and give a leg up to their own com­pan­ies. Even Pres­id­ent Obama has lam­basted Europe’s re­sponse to the Ed­ward Snowden rev­el­a­tions, sug­gest­ing some of the out­rage over spy­ing in Ger­many and else­where may be some­what disin­genu­ous.

“In de­fense of Google and Face­book, some­times the European re­sponse here is more com­mer­cially driv­en than any­thing else,” Obama told the tech site Re/code in Feb­ru­ary. “We have owned the In­ter­net. Our com­pan­ies have cre­ated it, ex­pan­ded it, per­fec­ted it in ways that they can’t com­pete. And of­ten­times what is por­trayed as high-minded po­s­i­tions on is­sues some­times is just de­signed to carve out some of their com­mer­cial in­terests.”

The let­ter comes amid a weeklong pub­lic-re­la­tions cam­paign be­ing waged by Europe to con­vince the U.S. that pro­tec­tion­ism fears are un­foun­ded—an ef­fort that will cul­min­ate on Thursday with a speech from Gün­ther Oet­tinger, the European Uni­on’s com­mis­sion­er in charge of di­git­al af­fairs, due to be de­livered at the Cen­ter for Transat­lantic Re­la­tions.

“I see the Amer­ic­ans’ con­cerns, but I think they’re un­foun­ded,” Oet­tinger, who ar­rived in the U.S. Tues­day, told The Wall Street Journ­al this week­end. “Hav­ing a level play­ing field is my am­bi­tion.”

Also on Thursday, the European Com­mis­sion is ex­pec­ted to re­lease pub­licly a work­ing con­sulta­tion pa­per that dis­cusses for­ging a reg­u­lat­ory frame­work for on­line plat­forms, poli­cing against il­leg­al con­tent pos­ted on the In­ter­net, and ac­cess to data stored in cloud ser­vices. Draft cop­ies of the pa­per were leaked on­line last week.

“While we ad­mire the dy­nam­ism and suc­cess of Sil­ic­on Val­ley, we trust in Europe’s abil­ity to foster tal­ent, cre­ativ­ity and en­tre­pren­eur­ship,” the let­ter reads. “… We con­sider close co­oper­a­tion between the EU and the U.S. as vi­tal in a chan­ging world.”

What We're Following See More »
Trump to Begin Covering His Own Legal Bills
2 days ago
Steele Says Follow the Money
2 days ago

"Christopher Steele, the former British intelligence officer who wrote the explosive dossier alleging ties between Donald Trump and Russia," says in a new book by The Guardian's Luke Harding that "Trump's land and hotel deals with Russians needed to be examined. ... Steele did not go into further detail, Harding said, but seemed to be referring to a 2008 home sale to the Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev. Richard Dearlove, who headed the UK foreign-intelligence unit MI6 between 1999 and 2004, said in April that Trump borrowed money from Russia for his business during the 2008 financial crisis."

Goldstone Ready to Meet with Mueller’s Team
2 days ago

"The British publicist who helped set up the fateful meeting between Donald Trump Jr. and a group of Russians at Trump Tower in June 2016 is ready to meet with Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller's office, according to several people familiar with the matter. Rob Goldstone has been living in Bangkok, Thailand, but has been communicating with Mueller's office through his lawyer, said a source close to Goldstone."

Kislyak Says Trump Campaign Contacts Too Numerous to List
2 days ago

"Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak said on Wednesday that it would take him more than 20 minutes to name all of the Trump officials he's met with or spoken to on the phone. ... Kislyak made the remarks in a sprawling interview with Russia-1, a popular state-owned Russian television channel."

Sabato Moves Alabama to “Lean Democrat”
3 days ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.