What’s Better at Predicting Elections: Polls or Markets?

Political-prediction website allowed people to monetize their picks for the Republican debate.

Republican presidential hopefuls Donald Trump and Jeb Bush exchange a high five during the Republican Presidential debate at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, California on Wednesday.
FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP/Getty Images
Eric Garcia
Add to Briefcase
Eric Garcia
Sept. 17, 2015, 2:11 p.m.

Uni­on Pub on Cap­it­ol Hill wasn’t host­ing a nor­mal de­bate-watch­ing party. In­side and on the patio, yes, on­look­ers drank their beers or gin and ton­ics, and watched the 11-can­did­ate GOP field duke it out on-screen. But among the more than 500 at­tendees, many were also there to make a profit.

On the mar­ket, par­ti­cipants could buy “shares” on ques­tions. There were stocks for which can­did­ate would see the biggest postde­bate bounce, and there are stocks for who will be the GOP nom­in­ee, with real money on the line. The pre­dic­tion-mar­ket web­site Pre­dic­tIt sponsored the event.

The way the mar­ket works is there is a bin­ary ques­tion for each can­did­ate that a trader could buy. For ex­ample, someone could buy shares that, yes, Jeb Bush will be the nom­in­ee or shares that, no, Bush will not be the nom­in­ee. There are also broad­er polit­ic­al ques­tions, such as “will the gov­ern­ment shut down on Oct. 1?” or “Will Greece exit the Euro­zone in 2015?”

Brandi Trav­is, chief mar­ket­ing of­ficer for Ar­is­totle In­ter­na­tion­al Inc., the tech­no­logy com­pany that helps run Pre­dic­tIt with Vic­tor­ia Uni­versity of Wel­ling­ton, said mar­kets are of­ten more ac­cur­ate than polling. Her com­pany got in­ter­ested in pre­dic­tion mar­kets after the suc­cess of In­trade, the Ire­land-based pre­dic­tion mar­ket that cor­rectly pre­dicted 49 of the 50 state out­comes in the 2012 pres­id­en­tial race.

As far as leg­al­ity is con­cerned, in Oc­to­ber 2014, Vic­tor­ia Uni­versity re­ceived a no-ac­tion let­ter from the U.S. Com­mod­ity Fu­tures Trad­ing Com­mis­sion out­lining how to main­tain com­pli­ance with the law. Pre­dic­tIt is only al­lowed to have 5,000 traders for each ques­tion, and each in­di­vidu­al in­vest­ment has a lim­it of $850.

Pre­dic­tIt’s web­site says the pur­pose is to re­search wheth­er pre­dic­tion mar­kets are a more re­li­able form of meas­ur­ing a like­li­hood of an event. A 2008 study showed Iowa Elec­tron­ic Mar­kets, a pre­dic­tion mar­ket based out of the Uni­versity of Iowa’s Tip­pie Col­lege of Busi­ness, is closer to the elec­tion out­come than polls 74 per­cent of the time.

“So when In­trade was shut down, we thought how could we go about get­ting this, launch­ing one of these [pre­dic­tion mar­kets] in the U.S. so that we have ac­cess to this in­form­a­tion,” Trav­is told Na­tion­al Journ­al ahead of the de­bate. Ar­is­totle’s web­site says its na­tion­al voter file has more than 190 mil­lion re­cords with at­trib­utes such as vot­ing his­tor­ies. When asked which cam­paigns use Ar­is­totle’s soft­ware and data, Trav­is said they could not com­ment.

“We don’t see really polling as a com­pet­it­or,” Trav­is said. “And we don’t think we’ll ever re­place polling be­cause it’s a very dif­fer­ent set of in­form­a­tion you’re provid­ing.” While polls ask people what they want to hap­pen or what they feel, pre­dic­tion mar­kets are filled with people act­ively go­ing to place money on what is go­ing to hap­pen, which sup­presses wish­ful think­ing that may come through in tra­di­tion­al polls.

That was the case with Tom O’Bri­en. He’s a per­son­al sup­port­er of Sen. Rand Paul, but put his money be­hind Carly Fior­ina, who had pos­it­ive re­cep­tion after the de­bate, and—some­what re­luct­antly—in Jeb Bush. He also puts some stocks in Louisi­ana Gov. Bobby Jin­dal.

“I’m a real­ist,” he said when de­scrib­ing his ra­tionale.

Fior­ina sup­port­ers were em­boldened. Max­imili­an Mer­rill, a lob­by­ist who sup­ports the former CEO, put money be­hind her in the mar­ket, say­ing she was the next Ron­ald Re­agan.

“I think to­night proved that I was right,” Mer­rill said. “I’ll bet you a dol­lar at least that Carly … is at the very least the VP nom­in­a­tion” choice.

Ahead of the de­bate, Trav­is poin­ted me to Daniel Kaseff, a stu­dent at George Wash­ing­ton Uni­versity who was sport­ing a t-shirt with the phrase “I sup­port Deez Nuts 2016” and who Trav­is told me is one of Pre­dic­tIt’s top traders.

“It lets me just take what I’m do­ing any­way as a hobby and trans­late that in­to mak­ing money,” he said. Kaseff, who also in­terned for Demo­crat­ic Sen. Richard Blu­menth­al, sees him­self as more of a short-term trader and said that Fior­ina “had a lot of room to climb.” She had the most to gain from the de­bate, which made her a safe bet. 

On the ques­tion of “Who would see the biggest bounce?” from the CNN de­bate, Fior­ina’s stock rose throughout the even­ing. Be­fore it star­ted, Fior­ina was at 35 cents, but shot up to 54 cents af­ter­ward.

But some of her com­pet­it­ors didn’t ne­ces­sar­ily take a nose­dive. On the sep­ar­ate ques­tion of who will be the GOP nom­in­ee, Bush was still in the lead and only dropped by two cents throughout the night, fol­lowed by Sen. Marco Ru­bio, who saw his stock in­crease five cents after the de­bate.

Many in the bar were not in­volved in trad­ing and some were just look­ing for a place to watch the de­bate, but for those who were trad­ing, this de­bate seemed to of­fer the same ex­cite­ment that traders get on the stock mar­ket floor dur­ing an ini­tial pub­lic of­fer­ing.

“When I was in ju­ni­or high, I liked get­ting stocks as a Christ­mas present and I found what I en­joyed do­ing was play­ing penny stocks,” said Robert Sin­ners, vice chair­man for mem­ber­ship for the D.C. Young Re­pub­lic­ans. “I budget like 25 bucks every two weeks or so. I’ve made some and I’ve lost some.”

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
10 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
1 days ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
1 days ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
2 days ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login