What’s Better at Predicting Elections: Polls or Markets?

Political-prediction website allowed people to monetize their picks for the Republican debate.

Republican presidential hopefuls Donald Trump and Jeb Bush exchange a high five during the Republican Presidential debate at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, California on Wednesday.
Eric Garcia
Add to Briefcase
Eric Garcia
Sept. 17, 2015, 2:11 p.m.

Uni­on Pub on Cap­it­ol Hill wasn’t host­ing a nor­mal de­bate-watch­ing party. In­side and on the patio, yes, on­look­ers drank their beers or gin and ton­ics, and watched the 11-can­did­ate GOP field duke it out on-screen. But among the more than 500 at­tendees, many were also there to make a profit.

On the mar­ket, par­ti­cipants could buy “shares” on ques­tions. There were stocks for which can­did­ate would see the biggest postde­bate bounce, and there are stocks for who will be the GOP nom­in­ee, with real money on the line. The pre­dic­tion-mar­ket web­site Pre­dic­tIt sponsored the event.

The way the mar­ket works is there is a bin­ary ques­tion for each can­did­ate that a trader could buy. For ex­ample, someone could buy shares that, yes, Jeb Bush will be the nom­in­ee or shares that, no, Bush will not be the nom­in­ee. There are also broad­er polit­ic­al ques­tions, such as “will the gov­ern­ment shut down on Oct. 1?” or “Will Greece exit the Euro­zone in 2015?”

Brandi Trav­is, chief mar­ket­ing of­ficer for Ar­is­totle In­ter­na­tion­al Inc., the tech­no­logy com­pany that helps run Pre­dic­tIt with Vic­tor­ia Uni­versity of Wel­ling­ton, said mar­kets are of­ten more ac­cur­ate than polling. Her com­pany got in­ter­ested in pre­dic­tion mar­kets after the suc­cess of In­trade, the Ire­land-based pre­dic­tion mar­ket that cor­rectly pre­dicted 49 of the 50 state out­comes in the 2012 pres­id­en­tial race.

As far as leg­al­ity is con­cerned, in Oc­to­ber 2014, Vic­tor­ia Uni­versity re­ceived a no-ac­tion let­ter from the U.S. Com­mod­ity Fu­tures Trad­ing Com­mis­sion out­lining how to main­tain com­pli­ance with the law. Pre­dic­tIt is only al­lowed to have 5,000 traders for each ques­tion, and each in­di­vidu­al in­vest­ment has a lim­it of $850.

Pre­dic­tIt’s web­site says the pur­pose is to re­search wheth­er pre­dic­tion mar­kets are a more re­li­able form of meas­ur­ing a like­li­hood of an event. A 2008 study showed Iowa Elec­tron­ic Mar­kets, a pre­dic­tion mar­ket based out of the Uni­versity of Iowa’s Tip­pie Col­lege of Busi­ness, is closer to the elec­tion out­come than polls 74 per­cent of the time.

“So when In­trade was shut down, we thought how could we go about get­ting this, launch­ing one of these [pre­dic­tion mar­kets] in the U.S. so that we have ac­cess to this in­form­a­tion,” Trav­is told Na­tion­al Journ­al ahead of the de­bate. Ar­is­totle’s web­site says its na­tion­al voter file has more than 190 mil­lion re­cords with at­trib­utes such as vot­ing his­tor­ies. When asked which cam­paigns use Ar­is­totle’s soft­ware and data, Trav­is said they could not com­ment.

“We don’t see really polling as a com­pet­it­or,” Trav­is said. “And we don’t think we’ll ever re­place polling be­cause it’s a very dif­fer­ent set of in­form­a­tion you’re provid­ing.” While polls ask people what they want to hap­pen or what they feel, pre­dic­tion mar­kets are filled with people act­ively go­ing to place money on what is go­ing to hap­pen, which sup­presses wish­ful think­ing that may come through in tra­di­tion­al polls.

That was the case with Tom O’Bri­en. He’s a per­son­al sup­port­er of Sen. Rand Paul, but put his money be­hind Carly Fior­ina, who had pos­it­ive re­cep­tion after the de­bate, and—some­what re­luct­antly—in Jeb Bush. He also puts some stocks in Louisi­ana Gov. Bobby Jin­dal.

“I’m a real­ist,” he said when de­scrib­ing his ra­tionale.

Fior­ina sup­port­ers were em­boldened. Max­imili­an Mer­rill, a lob­by­ist who sup­ports the former CEO, put money be­hind her in the mar­ket, say­ing she was the next Ron­ald Re­agan.

“I think to­night proved that I was right,” Mer­rill said. “I’ll bet you a dol­lar at least that Carly … is at the very least the VP nom­in­a­tion” choice.

Ahead of the de­bate, Trav­is poin­ted me to Daniel Kaseff, a stu­dent at George Wash­ing­ton Uni­versity who was sport­ing a t-shirt with the phrase “I sup­port Deez Nuts 2016” and who Trav­is told me is one of Pre­dic­tIt’s top traders.

“It lets me just take what I’m do­ing any­way as a hobby and trans­late that in­to mak­ing money,” he said. Kaseff, who also in­terned for Demo­crat­ic Sen. Richard Blu­menth­al, sees him­self as more of a short-term trader and said that Fior­ina “had a lot of room to climb.” She had the most to gain from the de­bate, which made her a safe bet. 

On the ques­tion of “Who would see the biggest bounce?” from the CNN de­bate, Fior­ina’s stock rose throughout the even­ing. Be­fore it star­ted, Fior­ina was at 35 cents, but shot up to 54 cents af­ter­ward.

But some of her com­pet­it­ors didn’t ne­ces­sar­ily take a nose­dive. On the sep­ar­ate ques­tion of who will be the GOP nom­in­ee, Bush was still in the lead and only dropped by two cents throughout the night, fol­lowed by Sen. Marco Ru­bio, who saw his stock in­crease five cents after the de­bate.

Many in the bar were not in­volved in trad­ing and some were just look­ing for a place to watch the de­bate, but for those who were trad­ing, this de­bate seemed to of­fer the same ex­cite­ment that traders get on the stock mar­ket floor dur­ing an ini­tial pub­lic of­fer­ing.

“When I was in ju­ni­or high, I liked get­ting stocks as a Christ­mas present and I found what I en­joyed do­ing was play­ing penny stocks,” said Robert Sin­ners, vice chair­man for mem­ber­ship for the D.C. Young Re­pub­lic­ans. “I budget like 25 bucks every two weeks or so. I’ve made some and I’ve lost some.”

What We're Following See More »
James Mattis Confirmed As Secretary of Defense
1 days ago
McConnell Pushing for Pompeo Confirmation
1 days ago
Trump Hasn’t Transferred Control Of Businesses
1 days ago

As of right now, President Donald Trump hasn't followed through on a promise. At his much-anticipated press conference last week, then President-elect Trump promised to turn over control of all of his businesses to his two sons, standing next to a large stack of papers his lawyer said did just that. However, as of 3:15 p.m. today, President Trump has not filed that paperwork. ProPublica got in touch with officials in New York, Delaware, and Florida, all of whom said that they haven't received any of the necessary paperwork necessary to officially transfer control.

Police Have Arrested 95 Protesters Thus Far
1 days ago
Trump Signs First Orders
1 days ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.