North Korean Uranium Enrichment Facility Expands

Global Security Newswire Staff
Aug. 8, 2013, 9:02 a.m.

The In­sti­tute for Sci­ence and In­ter­na­tion­al Se­cur­ity re­leased a re­port on Wed­nes­day find­ing that the area of the Yongby­on re­act­or com­plex re­spons­ible for en­rich­ing urani­um is now twice as large as it was in the past.

Ac­cord­ing to the New York Times, the re­port by the Wash­ing­ton-based, non­pro­lif­er­a­tion-mon­it­or­ing group trig­gers new wor­ries that North Korea is ex­pand­ing its ca­pa­city to pro­duce weapons-grade fuel.

The ana­lys­is was based on a com­par­is­on of satel­lite im­ages of the com­plex taken in March — be­fore con­struc­tion began on the ex­pan­sion — and on a June im­age that shows the frame­work of the ad­di­tion, which is roughly the same size as the ini­tial cent­ri­fuge fa­cil­ity.

Ad­di­tion­al pro­lif­er­a­tion ex­perts agreed with the IS­IS ana­lys­is that the urani­um-en­rich­ment por­tion of the site ap­pears to have doubled in size, the Times re­por­ted.

The ex­pan­ded fa­cil­ity could pro­duce any­where from 16 to 68 kilo­grams of weapons-grade urani­um, enough to man­u­fac­ture two nuc­le­ar weapons per year, the IS­IS re­port states. 

North Korea as­serts that the cent­ri­fuge fa­cil­ity pro­duces low-en­riched urani­um for an onsite ex­per­i­ment­al light wa­ter re­act­or at the com­plex. However, it is un­clear how ex­tens­ive the North’s en­rich­ment ca­pa­city has be­come and wheth­er the isol­ated na­tion has pro­duced weapon-grade urani­um — and, if so, how much, ac­cord­ing to the ana­lyt­ic­al or­gan­iz­a­tion.

North Korea has faced sanc­tions from the United Na­tions aimed at pre­vent­ing the North from ac­quir­ing spe­cialty metals and cent­ri­fuge com­pon­ents from over­seas. Py­ongy­ang might have been able to de­vel­op ways of pro­du­cing these ma­ter­i­als do­mest­ic­ally, ac­cord­ing to the news­pa­per.

The news comes less than two weeks after North Korea’s lead­er Kim Jong Un told the Chinese vice pres­id­ent that he was open to re­start­ing de­nuc­lear­iz­a­tion dis­cus­sions, and just a day after the North pro­posed an­oth­er round of talks with South Korea with the in­tent of re­open­ing a shuttered fact­ory com­plex op­er­ated jointly by the two na­tions.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
30 minutes ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×