Is Congress Simply No Fun Anymore?

Partisanship, gridlock have some former members of Congress glad to be gone

House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio performs a mock swearing in for Rep. Rodney Alexander, R-La., Thursday, Jan. 3, 2013, on Capitol Hill in Washington as the 113th Congress began. (AP Photo/ Evan Vucci)
National Journal
Elahe Izadi
Aug. 8, 2013, 3:30 p.m.

When Rep. Rod­ney Al­ex­an­der, R-La., an­nounced this week that he would re­tire from his seat after 10 years in the House, he cited his frus­tra­tions with the cur­rent grid­lock in Con­gress.

“Rather than pro­du­cing tan­gible solu­tions to bet­ter this na­tion, par­tis­an pos­tur­ing has cre­ated a le­gis­lat­ive stand­still,” he said in a state­ment. “Un­for­tu­nately, I do not fore­see this en­vir­on­ment to change any­time soon.”

Al­ex­an­der is not the only one who feels that way. Thanks to in­tense par­tis­an­ship, the in­ab­il­ity to move or con­trib­ute to le­gis­la­tion that be­comes law, de­mands to raise money, and the ear­mark ban, a num­ber of now-re­tired law­makers say life in Con­gress isn’t what it used to be.

“I thank God every night in my nightly pray­ers for giv­ing me the in­sight to de­cide in 2006 not to seek reelec­tion,” said former Rep. Sher­wood Boehlert, R-N.Y., who left after 24 years in Con­gress.

“Ci­vil­ity is a thing of the past,” he said. “It used to be “¦ the oth­er party was re­ferred to as ‘the oth­er side.’ Now they’re the archenemy and you shoot to kill on sight, and it is bizarre.”

Be­ing cor­di­al or en­ga­ging mem­bers of the op­pos­ite party has be­come more the ex­cep­tion rather than the norm, which is a mani­fest­a­tion of just how tox­ic the en­vir­on­ment on Cap­it­ol Hill has be­come. Former Rep. Brad Miller, D-N.C., who de­cided not to seek an­oth­er term last year after re­dis­trict­ing put him in the same dis­trict as fel­low Demo­crat­ic Rep. Dav­id Price, said the situ­ation in the House had got­ten “pro­foundly worse” in the 10 years he was there.

“There were a hand­ful of Re­pub­lic­ans that I got along with, but it got in­creas­ingly hard for them to work with Demo­crats,” Miller said.

Bill Gal­ston, a seni­or fel­low in gov­ernance stud­ies at the Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion, is cofounder of No La­bels, which has or­gan­ized 82 Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans in­to a group dubbed the “Prob­lem Solv­ers Co­ali­tion.” A num­ber of the law­makers in the co­ali­tion “have been pressed and quer­ied back home, ‘Why are you break­ing bread with the en­emy?’ ” he said.

“Al­though par­tis­an­ship is an en­dur­ing part of Amer­ic­an polit­ics, the type of hy­per-par­tis­an­ship we see now — I can’t find a pre­ced­ent for it in the past 100 years,” Gal­ston said.

The grow­ing num­ber of law­makers in the Prob­lem Solv­ers Co­ali­tion from across the polit­ic­al spec­trum un­der­scores that there are mem­bers who want al­tern­at­ives to the in­tense par­tis­an­ship that char­ac­ter­izes the cur­rent Con­gress, Gal­ston said.

The poster child for dis­may at the cur­rent state of af­fairs is former Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, said Gal­ston, not­ing that her “total frus­tra­tion at hy­per-par­tis­an­ship and grid­lock” is a wide­spread sen­ti­ment.

When an­noun­cing her re­tire­ment, Snowe said that “what mo­tiv­ates me is pro­du­cing res­ults,” but “I find it frus­trat­ing … that an at­mo­sphere of po­lar­iz­a­tion and ‘my way or the high­way’ ideo­lo­gies has be­come per­vas­ive in cam­paigns and in our gov­ern­ing in­sti­tu­tions.” Snowe has in­stead sought to in­flu­ence the polit­ic­al dis­course from out­side the Sen­ate through the Bi­par­tis­an Policy Cen­ter’s Com­mis­sion on Polit­ic­al Re­form.

Of course, much also de­pends on what brought mem­bers to Con­gress in the first place. “If your de­sire is to get something done, then you’re go­ing to be very frus­trated,” Gal­ston said. But for those mem­bers “who came to Wash­ing­ton to wage ideo­lo­gic­al war on what they see as a bi­par­tis­an status quo,” he said, “if you ask them, they will say that gum­ming up the works is not part of the prob­lem, it’s part of the solu­tion. They’re ac­tu­ally happy when le­gis­la­tion doesn’t pass, un­less it’s the kind of le­gis­la­tion that they ap­prove of.”

The in­ab­il­ity to pass le­gis­la­tion and work across party lines has cer­tainly been a ma­jor part of a num­ber of re­cent re­tire­ments. Former Rep. Steven La­Tour­ette, R-Ohio, who re­tired in Janu­ary, re­cently told Na­tion­al Journ­al Daily, “I miss Con­gress like I miss an abs­cessed tooth.”

La­Tour­ette ad­ded: “I couldn’t see things get­ting ac­com­plished in pos­it­ive ways. We used to solve prob­lems like stu­dent loans and trans­port­a­tion and the farm bill.”

Be­ing a mem­ber of Con­gress these days also means the in­creased de­mand to spend time each day di­al­ing for dol­lars. Miller, who says he would have sought reelec­tion if his dis­trict hadn’t been re­drawn, said rais­ing money has be­come more and more in­teg­ral for mem­bers’ suc­cess on the Hill — par­tic­u­larly for those of the minor­ity party who have little to no in­flu­ence over shap­ing or in­tro­du­cing le­gis­la­tion “that is any­thing more than a talk­ing point.”

“The only way to get no­ticed, to win re­spect, is to raise a lot of money” to give to oth­er mem­bers, Miller said. “It’s hard to ima­gine that that’s really what demo­cracy should really be about. It means that mem­bers of Con­gress have to spend their time in a little room with a phone, call­ing up lob­by­ists and ask­ing them to con­trib­ute from their PACs, then rush­ing to the floor to vote on a lot of is­sues that very few mem­bers have had time to think about and cer­tainly not to shape in any im­port­ant way.”

Boehlert, whose last reelec­tion cost roughly $1.5 mil­lion, said he didn’t have to spend so much of his time rais­ing money in his last cycle. But “a dis­pro­por­tion­ate share of the mem­ber’s time is spent di­al­ing for dol­lars,” he said. “When you sit in your of­fice and open up a let­ter that is from the party headquar­ters, and it’s the party caucus over at the Re­pub­lic­an Cap­it­ol Hill Club, you know what that’s all about. Money.”

On top of it all, the ear­mark ban has left mem­bers of Con­gress with few­er tools to make a dir­ect and quick im­pact on their in­di­vidu­al dis­tricts, Boehlert said.

Be­ing in Con­gress still has its up­sides — you still get to in­flu­ence the dis­course of the day and have ac­cess to in­form­a­tion, over­sight and money. Life after Con­gress isn’t bad either, as many former mem­bers do well for them­selves on K Street or else­where.

Boehlert says he does miss some things about life as a con­gress­man, from be­ing in the mix on de­cision-mak­ing to the “con­geni­al­ity that used to be so much a part of that great in­sti­tu­tion,” he said. “But boy, I just don’t miss what I see now.”

Gal­ston said the tox­ic at­mo­sphere is prob­ably dis­cour­aging many would-be can­did­ates. “I sus­pect that a whole lot of people, who in oth­er cir­cum­stances might have con­sidered run­ning for na­tion­al le­gis­lat­ive of­fice, have de­cided not to on the grounds that it’s too hard to get things done, and also too hard to do what it takes, par­tic­u­larly if you’re a mem­ber of the House of Rep­res­ent­at­ives, to stay there,” he said.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×