Somewhere in Russia, Edward Snowden Is Smiling

President Barack Obama speaks during a news conference in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Friday, Aug. 9, 2013.
National Journal
James Oliphant
Aug. 9, 2013, 1:31 p.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama couldn’t say it — he denied it re­peatedly in fact — but Ed­ward Snowden was very much the reas­on he felt com­pelled to stand be­fore the na­tion­al press on a sun-baked Fri­day Au­gust af­ter­noon and at­tempt to ex­plain why his ad­min­is­tra­tion would pur­sue re­forms of its coun­terter­ror­ism pro­grams even though — and this is the tricky part — he wouldn’t con­cede that those pro­grams are flawed in any way.

That brings us back to Snowden, the whis­tleblower/pat­ri­ot/trait­or squirreled away some­where in Rus­sia after re­veal­ing key op­er­a­tion­al de­tails of the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s do­mest­ic sur­veil­lance pro­grams. The drip-drip of dis­clos­ures was slowly erod­ing the pub­lic’s faith in the sys­tem, the pres­id­ent said Fri­day, and he needed to take steps to re­as­sure the world that it wasn’t be­ing ab­used. He wor­ried aloud that Amer­ic­ans were in­creas­ingly view­ing the gov­ern­ment as an Or­wellian “Big Broth­er.”

“It’s not enough for me as pres­id­ent to have con­fid­ence in these pro­grams,” Obama said be­fore re­port­ers in the White House East Room. “The Amer­ic­an people need to have con­fid­ence in them, as well.”

For the pres­id­ent, the day marked an at­tempt to wrest some con­trol of a situ­ation that in­creas­ingly threatens to dis­rupt the na­tion­al se­cur­ity cal­cu­lus. Late last month, an at­tempt by lib­er­als and liber­tari­an Re­pub­lic­ans in the House to lim­it the NSA’s au­thor­ity fell inches short. To that end, the pres­id­ent an­nounced that he would work with Con­gress to re­write a key sec­tion of the Pat­ri­ot Act, push for more op­pos­ing views be­fore the shad­owy For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court, move to de­clas­si­fy more na­tion­al se­cur­ity doc­u­ments, and ap­point an out­side pan­el to ex­am­ine wheth­er the sur­veil­lance pro­grams strike the prop­er bal­ance between se­cur­ity and civil liber­ties.

Obama, as well as seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials, did their best to paint the new ini­ti­at­ives as a product of a re­view pro­cess the pres­id­ent com­menced when he first as­sumed of­fice, with Obama re­peatedly not­ing Fri­day that he had cri­ti­cized some NSA pro­grams as a sen­at­or. But just about no one was buy­ing that. And the pres­id­ent ul­ti­mately ad­mit­ted that Snowden’s ac­tions had forced the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s hand.

“The leaks triggered a much more rap­id and pas­sion­ate re­sponse than would have been the case if I had simply ap­poin­ted this re­view board,” Obama said, while adding, “I ac­tu­ally think we would have got­ten to the same place — and we would have done so without put­ting at risk our na­tion­al se­cur­ity.”

Still, Obama wasn’t ready to re­vise his as­sess­ment of Snowden, who, he re­minded the press, has been charged with mul­tiple felon­ies. “I don’t think he was a pat­ri­ot,” Obama said.

Even as the pres­id­ent was out­lining his plans, he was just as quick to in­sist that the NSA’s wide lat­it­ude to col­lect data isn’t be­ing ab­used. “Amer­ica is not in­ter­ested in spy­ing on or­din­ary people,” Obama said. The sur­veil­lance pro­grams, he said, were valu­able and “should be pre­served.” The flaw, if there was one, he said, lay in his as­sump­tion that the pub­lic would trust that the “checks and bal­ances” in place between the ad­min­is­tra­tion, Con­gress, and the courts was enough to se­cure per­son­al free­dom. In­stead, he said, after Snowden’s rev­el­a­tions, “I think people have ques­tions about this pro­gram.”

The in­de­pend­ent com­mis­sion, which will be com­prised of ex­perts from the in­tel­li­gence, civil liber­ties, pri­vacy and tech sec­tors and which will re­lease a pre­lim­in­ary re­port in 60 days, will be tasked with giv­ing the pub­lic a more com­plete pic­ture of NSA op­er­a­tions. “Let’s put the whole ele­phant out there so people know ex­actly what they’re look­ing at,” Obama said.

The NSA will be giv­en a new high-rank­ing of­fi­cial charged with pro­tect­ing civil liber­ties, while there may be some kind of at­tempt to place a sim­il­ar civil-liber­ties ad­voc­ate be­fore the FISA court, which over­whelm­ingly ap­proves gov­ern­ment ap­plic­a­tions for sur­veil­lance op­er­a­tions.

The late-sum­mer press­er may also have been an ef­fort to quell one source of con­tro­versy — the NSA pro­grams — even as oth­ers threaten to erupt upon his re­turn from a Martha’s Vine­yard va­ca­tion. He down­played grow­ing ant­ag­on­ism with Rus­sia and its pres­id­ent, Vladi­mir Putin, over the shel­ter­ing of Snowden, say­ing the two coun­tries would con­tin­ue to work to­geth­er where pos­sible. He warned about the threat posed by al-Qaida in the Ar­a­bi­an Pen­in­sula even as he main­tained that its ca­pa­city to do harm on the level of the Sept. 11 at­tacks had been decim­ated — a mixed mes­sage that has had the ad­min­is­tra­tion strug­gling of late. And he again urged Con­gress to pass a com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion re­form bill over House ob­jec­tions.

And, there’s that loom­ing budget show­down with Re­pub­lic­ans this fall. Find­ing surer ground, the pres­id­ent was quick to ham­mer those in the GOP who have called for a gov­ern­ment shut­down if his health care plan isn’t de­fun­ded. “I think the really in­ter­est­ing ques­tion is why it is my friends in the oth­er party have made pre­vent­ing these people from get­ting health care their holy grail,” Obama said. “Their num­ber one pri­or­ity is mak­ing sure 30 mil­lion people don’t get health care,” call­ing the threat a “bad idea.”

That mark­er thrown, the pres­id­ent heads off for his sum­mer va­ca­tion. But as sure as the first day of school, tur­moil on just about every front awaits his re­turn.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4380) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×