Two Parody Twitter Accounts That Perfectly Explain U.S. Politics

@GOPTeens and @SalonDotCom are the future of political satire.

National Journal
Emma Roller
Aug. 7, 2014, 1 a.m.

In this era of nev­er-end­ing grid­lock, it may seem like Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats can find no com­mon ground. But there’s at least one thing we can still agree on: It’s fun to an­onym­ously poke fun at each oth­er on the In­ter­net.

Two newly pop­u­lar Twit­ter ac­counts — @GOP­Teens and @Salon­Dot­Com — prove as much.

The first ac­count, @GOP­Teens, does a good job of skew­er­ing the hol­low way politi­cians try to ap­peal to young people. Its tweets — which are ad­orned with a logo of the Re­pub­lic­an Party ele­phant wear­ing avi­at­or shades — are littered with ex­traneous hasht­ags and buzzwords.

“#Teens: Send in a #selfie with your #Birth­Cer­ti­fic­ate to prove how #easy it was to find!” a typ­ic­al tweet reads. An­oth­er makes a pur­pose­fully lame pop cul­ture ref­er­ence: “#Teens: Let’s not #for­get who the ORI­GIN­AL #Guard­i­an­OfTheGalaxy was” — fol­lowed by a Time magazine cov­er fea­tur­ing Ron­ald Re­agan’s Star Wars pro­gram.

The cre­at­or of GOP Teens is Daniel Kibble­smith, 30. He is an as­so­ci­ate ed­it­or at Click­hole — a spinoff site from The Onion that par­od­ies vir­al con­tent web­sites like Up­worthy and BuzzFeed — and has co-writ­ten a hu­mor book, How to Win at Everything. Kibble­smith says he first pur­chased the GOP­Teens.com do­main name in Oc­to­ber 2012, but it lay dormant un­til re­cently, when he de­cided to bring the GOP­Teens voice to life.

“It’s this really spe­cif­ic voice of failed youth out­reach fall­ing on its face,” Kibble­smith told Na­tion­al Journ­al. “I pic­ture the per­son be­hind the ac­count be­ing one or more Karl Rove types who are just try­ing any­thing that they can think of — slang or pop cul­ture ref­er­ences, any­thing that they can think of — to try to get kids in­ter­ested in the Re­pub­lic­an Party.”

Most of GOP Teens’ tweets are clearly satire, but oth­ers ap­proach the Un­canny Val­ley of par­ody Twit­ter ac­counts: satire so real­ist­ic that it be­comes al­most in­dis­tin­guish­able from the ob­ject it’s sat­ir­iz­ing. There’s ac­tu­ally a law for this type of par­ody — it’s called Poe’s Law.

One ex­ample of Poe’s Law in ef­fect: Two weeks ago, Gen­er­a­tion Op­por­tun­ity — the Koch-backed group re­spons­ible for the Creepy Uncle Sam ads — hos­ted a “Creepy Carenival” out­side the U.S. Cap­it­ol in an ef­fort to con­vince young people of the Af­ford­able Care Act’s ills.

A tweet from Gen­er­a­tion Op­por­tun­ity’s ac­count pro­moted the event’s ma­gi­cian, “Milllen­ni­al Mike.” An­oth­er tweet, ac­com­pan­ied by a photo of two clowns, reads, “We’re of­fi­cially un­der­way! It’s get­ting”¦..Creepy #Creepy­Care”.

A week later, GOP Teens tweeted, “#Teens: Is #Obama­care really an #ObamaS­CARE?”

The dry­ness of the ac­count has led some people to think GOP Teens is a genu­ine ac­count (even I wasn’t sure if it was a par­ody at first). On Ju­ly 7, Kan­sas Re­pub­lic­an Gov. Sam Brown­back sent this now-de­leted tweet: “Thanks for fol­low­ing me @GOP­teens; You are the fu­ture.” And former CNN host Piers Mor­gan be­moaned one of GOP Teens’ tweets, which jok­ingly asked teens what their fa­vor­ite gun was. Mor­gan retweeted the mes­sage and ad­ded, “The fu­ture….UGH.”

But Kibble­smith says he isn’t try­ing to in­ten­tion­ally mis­lead any­one.

“Some of my read­ers don’t real­ize it’s a par­ody,” he said. “Un­forced er­rors are hil­ari­ous, but I’m not set­ting out to dupe any­body.”

Through his par­ody, Kibble­smith has achieved something few oth­er polit­ic­al Twit­ter ac­counts can boast — he’s gained real, live teen­age fans. He even star­ted mak­ing T-shirts plastered with the GOP Teens logo and dif­fer­ent slo­gans. By Kibble­smith’s ac­count, he’s sold more than 500 of the T-shirts, many to young people, who proudly tweet pho­tos of them­selves wear­ing their shirts to Kibble­smith.

Of course, this sort of tone-deaf out­reach is not lim­ited to Re­pub­lic­ans.

“I think it is ab­so­lutely a bi­par­tis­an thing,” Kibble­smith said. “I think all politi­cians — maybe with the ex­cep­tion of Barack Obama — sound pretty in­sin­cere when they try to get down and rap with the kids. But I gotta ad­mit, it’s a lot easi­er with Re­pub­lic­ans.”

Like failed youth out­reach, satire can be bi­par­tis­an, too. Jordan Bloom, an opin­ion ed­it­or for the con­ser­vat­ive web­site The Daily Caller, cre­ated Salon­Dot­Com — an ac­count that par­od­ies the left-lean­ing web­site Salon — with his room­mate, Robert Mari­ani. Much like how GOP Teens skew­ers how trans­par­ently un­cool the Re­pub­lic­an Party can be, Salon­Dot­Com deftly par­od­ies the sort of cul­tur­al hand-wringing that pro­gress­ive me­dia can fall vic­tim to.

“I used a 10 year-old pro­file pic­ture for on­line dat­ing — and I came face-to-face with age dis­crim­in­a­tion,” reads one tweet. “Is ‘Pomp and Cir­cum­stance’ a song about white priv­ilege?” reads an­oth­er.

Bloom said he was pleased with how eas­ily he could trick users in­to be­liev­ing it was real. (For ref­er­ence to an ac­tu­al Salon story — ahem.)

“That was the great thing — we were fool­ing people on both sides of the spec­trum,” Bloom told Na­tion­al Journ­al. “You would have the lib­er­als that would be ask­ing for links, and then the con­ser­vat­ives that would get out­raged.”

But un­der Twit­ter’s terms of ser­vice, par­ody ac­counts must ex­pli­citly out them­selves as par­ody ac­counts — something Bloom didn’t want to do. After someone re­por­ted the ac­count — Bloom says it was “al­most cer­tainly” a Salon em­ploy­ee — Twit­ter even­tu­ally shut down the ac­count, lead­ing many con­ser­vat­ive users to call on Twit­ter to #FreeSalon­Dot­Com. They got their ac­count back 10 days later.

“This was my first ex­per­i­ence of hav­ing the full weight of the right-wing noise ma­chine on your side,” Bloom said. “That was pretty cool to see.”

Satir­ic­al tweets aren’t ex­actly the new Can­dide, but they do rep­res­ent a new op­por­tun­ity for polit­ic­al satire, al­beit in 140-char­ac­ter bites. After all, this is how we con­sume cul­ture now — one dis­crete chunk of in­form­a­tion at a time — so it’s nat­ur­al for satire to fol­low suit.

“The con­ver­sa­tion about cul­ture is be­ing trun­cated by people who only want to look at a piece of art or mu­sic or a per­son based on the iden­tity polit­ics that that per­son holds,” Bloom said. “I don’t want to sound like I’m try­ing to be a hero or something, but I think there’s some use­ful bubble-burst­ing that ought to go down.”

Poke away.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 5152) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
4 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×