Meet the Invasive Pest Fueling Lake Erie’s Toxic Algae Bloom

This September 23, 2011 photo shows a man holding a handful of Zebra mussels near Kingston, Canada, which have invaded Lake Ontario. Zebra mussels from the Caspian Sea, introduced to North America by accident, are becoming a veritable plague releasing toxic chemicals into the Great Lakes, Canadian biologists say. The mussels hitch-hiked to Canada on the ballasts of cargo ships arriving on the continent in 1986. And in the past two decades the thumbnail-sized creatures have spread and are found in more than a third of the Great Lakes. AFP PHOTO / Kilian FICHOU
National Journal
Aug. 6, 2014, 1 a.m.

Toxic algae is wreaking havoc in northern Ohio, but it’s not doing it alone.

A toxic bloom in Lake Erie — which forced the city of Toledo to turn off its tap water for two days this weekend — was exacerbated by another environmental calamity: hordes of invasive mussels that plague the Great Lakes ecosystem.

The mollusks, known as zebra and quagga mussels, arrived from Eastern Europe in the late 1980s by latching onto boats and have since spread throughout the Great Lakes.

And, in terms of water quality, the critters are a reverse filter: They remove sediment and food particles out of the water, sapping the resources native mussels and fish need.

But they leave the dangerous elements in place. The invaders are picky and don’t absorb toxic forms of algae known as microcystis, leaving it to collect in the harmful blue-green algae blooms that collect on the surface.

“It’s basically spitting the stuff out,” explained Alan Steinman, director of the Annis Water Resources Institute at Michigan’s Grand Valley State University. “Now the blue-greens in the water column have very few competitors “¦ and they bloom.”

That’s what’s happening in Lake Erie, and this weekend, the trouble came to Toledo. More than 400,000 residents were without water until Monday morning after a toxin linked to an algal bloom was detected in an intake system. The ban was lifted on Monday, but the algae problem isn’t going away — blooms will linger throughout the summer and have been steadily making a comeback in Lake Erie for years.

The mussels aren’t the only factor behind the toxic algae. The blooms themselves are the result of an excess of phosphorous in the lake, due in large part to runoff of fertilizer from farms and other agricultural sources, as well as from septic systems and cities (the blooms grow especially quickly in shallow Lake Erie, especially on its western end). Excessive rain and storms linked to climate change have also been fingered as culprits in the recent rise in algae blooms, which were prevalent in the 1960s and ‘70s until the Clean Water Act forced the cleanup of some pollution sources.

But the presence of the mussels exacerbates the other factors, said Marc Smith, policy director for the National Wildlife Federation’s Great Lakes office.

“While all this nutrient runoff is happening, the mussels really stir things up and double down the problem,” Smith said. “There’s no easy answer to this.”

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has predicted that Lake Erie will experience a “significant” bloom this year, although it will be smaller than one that cropped up in 2013 and a record-setting bloom in 2011 that covered 1,900 square miles of the lake.

The thick green cyanobacteria won’t just pose a danger to water supply; the blooms also block out light and can kill off plant and animal life in the lake.

They come at a time when the invasion of mussels is stirring up trouble in the Great Lakes — and it’s spreading fast. They’ve been detected as far away as California and Texas and it’s estimated that there are more than 950 trillion (with a “t”) in Lake Michigan alone. It’s a concentration so high that videos have shown them stacked as much as 5 feet high.

That has the potential to upend the ecosystem by robbing fish of the nutrients they need, soaking up plankton and tiny plants before they can reach the native species. Ironically that’s left lakes clearer, but has also contributed to a die-off of fish and species up the food chain. A 2011 NWF report that looked at the “boom and bust” of the Great Lakes ecosystem found that 95 percent of the biomass of prey fish in Lake Huron had dropped 95 percent in 15 years, which in turn left bigger fish like salmon with little to eat. In Lake Michigan, the population of the tiny shrimp at the bottom of the food chain had dropped 94 percent in a decade.

And the mussels can also gather and clog up the intake tanks for water systems and industrial sites, which has caused hundreds of millions of dollars in damage in the Great Lakes region. A recent series in the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel looked at the impact of invasive species across the Great Lakes.

With no natural predators or known way to eradicate the mussels, much of the response has been focused on simply stopping the mussels from spreading any further. The Environmental Protection Agency has advised boaters travelling in waters that may have been affected to be aware of any mussels latching on and using a heated spray to ward them off.

Scientists haven’t yet found a way to eradicate the mussels without impacting the broader food system, and their vast reach makes a targeted approach difficult.

Even solving the mussel problem isn’t likely to fix the rise of algae blooms, given the myriad factors that have contributed to their growth. Environmentalists have long sought more control over agricultural runoff to reduce the amount of phosphorous seeping into freshwater bodies, a call that’s been renewed in the days after the Toledo incident.

And President Obama last month signed the Harmful Algal Blooms and Hypoxia Research and Control Amendments Act, which authorized $20.5 million to NOAA from 2014 to 2018 to study harmful blooms and look at solutions in freshwater.

Smith said the eventual solution would have to be a comprehensive effort that considered all of the causes, which in turn could clean up a number of water problems.

“To address invasive species without considering farmland or water quality won’t work. We know everything has to be taken into account together,” he said. “There’s a lot of money out there that could be utilized, but it has to be strategic and not just random acts of conservation.”

What We're Following See More »
Trump Signs Border Deal
2 days ago

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Trump Declares National Emergency
3 days ago

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
3 days ago

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."

Where Will the Emergency Money Come From?
3 days ago

"ABC News has learned the president plans to announce on Friday his intention to spend about $8 billion on the border wall with a mix of spending from Congressional appropriations approved Thursday night, executive action and an emergency declaration. A senior White House official familiar with the plan told ABC News that $1.375 billion would come from the spending bill Congress passed Thursday; $600 million would come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture fund; $2.5 billion would come from the Pentagon's drug interdiction program; and through an emergency declaration: $3.5 billion from the Pentagon's military construction budget."

House Passes Funding Deal
3 days ago

"The House passed a massive border and budget bill that would avert a shutdown and keep the government funded through the end of September. The Senate passed the measure earlier Thursday. The bill provides $1.375 billion for fences, far short of the $5.7 billion President Trump had demanded to fund steel walls. But the president says he will sign the legislation, and instead seek to fund his border wall by declaring a national emergency."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.