Who Loses Primaries? Weak Candidates

There is stronger “anti-incumbent” sentiment than in the past, but this year’s primary losers have only themselves to blame.

Rep. Scott DesJarlais, left, takes a photograph with his iPhone during an oversight committee hearing
National Journal
Jack Fitzpatrick
Add to Briefcase
Jack Fitzpatrick
Aug. 5, 2014, 1 a.m.

This week’s House primar­ies in Michigan and Ten­ness­ee could bring this cycle’s third and fourth losses for Re­pub­lic­an in­cum­bents, but don’t solely blame any “anti-in­cum­bent” sen­ti­ment per­vad­ing the Amer­ic­an elect­or­ate. Per­son­al scan­dals, Santa Claus cos­tumes, and oth­er uniquely loc­al touches will be far more im­port­ant to the most vul­ner­able House mem­bers in up­com­ing primar­ies.

Re­pub­lic­an Reps. Kerry Bentivolio of Michigan and Scott Des­Jar­lais of Ten­ness­ee are on thin ice in primary races that have been defined by their in­di­vidu­al short­com­ings. Bentivolio, pre­vi­ously a reindeer farm­er and Santa Claus im­per­son­at­or, has been called the “ac­ci­dent­al con­gress­man,” hav­ing won his seat in 2012 only after Rep. Thad­deus Mc­Cot­ter un­ex­pec­tedly failed to qual­i­fy for the GOP primary, leav­ing Bentivolio as the only Re­pub­lic­an on the bal­lot. He faces a well-fun­ded at­tor­ney en­dorsed by the U.S. Cham­ber of Com­merce, Dave Trott, on Tues­day.

Des­Jar­lais’s 2001 di­vorce pro­ceed­ings were made pub­lic in 2012, re­veal­ing that he sup­por­ted his wife’s de­cision to have two abor­tions be­fore they were mar­ried and that Des­Jar­lais, a phys­i­cian, had sexu­al re­la­tion­ships with pa­tients and cowork­ers at his of­fice and pres­sured one to get an abor­tion. He faces state Sen. Jim Tracy in an un­usu­al Thursday primary.

Des­pite a polit­ic­al at­mo­sphere that’s bad for in­cum­bents, the two Re­pub­lic­ans who have lost their seats to primary op­pon­ents — along with Bentivolio and Des­Jar­lais, who could well join them — have in­di­vidu­al weak­nesses, not at­mo­spher­ics, to blame. Rep. Ral­ph Hall, the 91-year-old Re­pub­lic­an from Texas, lost to a young­er op­pon­ent who sup­por­ted term lim­its and cri­ti­cized him for serving for so long. And though sen­ti­ments about im­mig­ra­tion and oth­er na­tion­al is­sues un­doubtedly played some part in House Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor’s sur­pris­ing de­feat, the main hit on Can­tor was that he didn’t spend enough time in his dis­trict and thus didn’t take eco­nom­ist Dave Brat’s chal­lenge ser­i­ously.

At­trib­ut­ing these losses to a na­tion­wide trend “would be a huge leap of lo­gic,” said Den­ise De­Cook, a Michigan Re­pub­lic­an con­sult­ant with the Ster­ling Cor­por­a­tion.

“There’s the Can­tor prob­lem: He doesn’t go back to the dis­trict and knock on doors and look people in the eye­ball,” De­Cook said. “But that’s not an anti-in­cum­bent thing, it’s a Can­tor thing.”

De­Cook said she ex­pects Bentivolio to lose by a wide mar­gin not only be­cause of a sense that he nev­er be­longed in Con­gress but be­cause he hasn’t cam­paigned very hard. Trott has raised about six times as much money as Bentivolio and led by wide mar­gins in the pub­lic polls.

Des­pite the bad num­bers, Bentivolio ran a quiet cam­paign and even at­ten­ded a fact-find­ing mis­sion to Cent­ral Amer­ica only a few weeks be­fore his elec­tion. It’s pos­sible Bentivolio has resigned him­self to los­ing and is fo­cus­ing on serving out his term, De­Cook said.

“I don’t think he of­ten knows what to do polit­ic­ally,” she said. “If you’re only go­ing to be in for one term, you might as well be a con­gress­man for one term and don’t do the polit­ics.”

In the end, if Bentivolio loses, it will be “com­pletely on him,” said Dave Doyle, a Re­pub­lic­an con­sult­ant with Mar­ket­ing Re­source Group. “It’s the unique cir­cum­stances of Mc­Cot­ter not be­ing on the bal­lot and Bentivolio fall­ing in­to that seat.”

In Ten­ness­ee, Des­Jar­lais faces a sim­il­arly unique set of cir­cum­stances, al­though he could still man­age to squeak out a vic­tory. After the news of his in­dis­cre­tions broke in 2012, Demo­crats thought it gave them a shot at Des­Jar­lais’s deep-red dis­trict. The Re­pub­lic­an still won reelec­tion but im­me­di­ately be­came one of Con­gress’s most vul­ner­able in­cum­bents. Tracy, Des­Jar­lais’s well-fun­ded, well-con­nec­ted op­pon­ent, an­nounced his run against the in­cum­bent be­fore Des­Jar­lais was even sworn in for his second term.

Tracy has made Des­Jar­lais’s per­son­al bag­gage an is­sue in the cam­paign, but only in a subtle way early on. In a Janu­ary 2013 in­ter­view with The Daily Caller, Tracy said he was run­ning be­cause “the coun­try is bank­rupt, fin­an­cially and mor­ally” and he was a “sol­id con­ser­vat­ive “¦ in word and deed.” In a June TV ad, Tracy told view­ers that “too many con­gress­men are short on in­teg­rity.” Tracy’s mes­sage got more poin­ted as time went on: An­oth­er ad re­leased in late Ju­ly says dir­ectly that Des­Jar­lais’s scan­dals have made him less ef­fect­ive in Con­gress.

Tracy cam­paign man­ager Stephanie Jarnagin said the cam­paign has fo­cused more on how Des­Jar­lais hasn’t seemed present in the dis­trict but ad­ded that he lost sup­port among loc­al al­lies after his di­vorce pro­ceed­ings tran­scripts were re­leased, which hurt his abil­ity to raise money. Either way, Jarnagin said, if her House race is one of the rare ones to fea­ture an in­cum­bent loss, it’ll be be­cause of the can­did­ates in­volved.

“The No. 1 is­sue is not so much what happened in the past,” she said. “It’s that [Des­Jar­lais] hasn’t shown up in the dis­trict. He doesn’t go to stuff.”

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
18 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
19 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
19 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
23 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×