James Brady Revolutionized the Gun-Control Debate. Does It Stop With Him?

The man who took a bullet for Ronald Reagan spurred the most productive effort to restrict gun ownership in history.

Former White House Press Secretary under the Reagan Administration James Brady, left, is pushed by White House Deputy Press Secretary Bill Burton during his visit at the White House June 16, 2009 in Washington, D.C.
National Journal
Lucia Graves
Aug. 4, 2014, 1:05 p.m.

Maybe you’ve heard this: On March 30, 1981, White House press sec­ret­ary James Brady was wounded in an as­sas­sin­a­tion at­tempt against Pres­id­ent Re­agan. Brady was shot in the head, los­ing about 20 per­cent of his front­al brain tis­sue, ac­cord­ing to a New York Times re­port of the in­cid­ent. The in­jury was so bad, in fact, that speak­ing in the White House Situ­ation Room the day of Re­agan’s as­sas­sin­a­tion at­tempt, Richard Al­len, then na­tion­al se­cur­ity ad­viser to the pres­id­ent, pro­nounced Brady dead.

He didn’t die that day though. He died today: Monday, Aug. 14, 2014. And in the in­ter­ven­ing three-plus dec­ades he changed the way we talk about gun con­trol forever.

James and his wife, Sarah Brady — some­times de­scribed as the “first fam­ily” of gun con­trol — be­came pas­sion­ate evan­gel­ists for the gun-con­trol move­ment, lob­by­ing for stricter laws and even­tu­ally form­ing the Brady Cam­paign to Pre­vent Gun Vi­ol­ence. Their ef­forts cul­min­ated 12 years after the shoot­ing with the pas­sage of the Brady Hand­gun Vi­ol­ence Pre­ven­tion Act, known as the Brady Bill. Signed in­to law by Pres­id­ent Clin­ton, the new law ushered in the era of man­dated fed­er­al back­ground checks and wait­ing peri­ods for many gun buy­ers.

When the law passed, the Re­agan as­sas­sin­a­tion at­tempt was still re­l­at­ively fresh in Amer­ica’s col­lect­ive con­scious, and Brady served as a power­ful re­mind­er of the need for such reg­u­la­tions. “What I was, I am not now,” Brady said at the time. “What I was, I will nev­er be again.”

It wasn’t the last gun-re­form bill Con­gress would pass, but even today, it’s the floor any sub­sequent le­gis­la­tion will stand on.

A year later the gun-con­trol move­ment would gain more steam when Clin­ton signed the Vi­ol­ent Crime Con­trol and Law En­force­ment Act in­to law. This law banned 19 dif­fer­ent types of as­sault weapons, in­clud­ing AK-47s, as well as the man­u­fac­ture and dis­tri­bu­tion of magazines hold­ing more than 10 rounds of am­muni­tion.

But the pro­gress on magazines proved tem­por­ary. In 2004, 10 years after it be­came law, the pro­vi­sion ban­ning pos­ses­sion of high-ca­pa­city magazines ex­pired through a sun­set pro­vi­sion.

In 2007, in the wake of the Vir­gin­ia Tech shoot­ing, Con­gress would call again on re­forms first en­acted un­der the Brady Bill. The NICS Im­prove­ment Amend­ments Act, signed in­to law by Pres­id­ent Bush in Janu­ary 2008, re­quired states to provide data on men­tally un­sound in­di­vidu­als to Na­tion­al In­stant Crim­in­al Back­ground Check Sys­tem, a data­base first man­dated un­der Brady’s land­mark law in 1993.

Since then, however, con­gres­sion­al re­forms have stalled.

Gun-con­trol re­form ef­forts fol­low­ing the New­town, Conn., shoot­ing failed loudly (see, for in­stance, the de­mise of an ex­pan­ded back­ground-check bill in April 2013 or the fail­ure of a re­new­al of the Un­detect­able Fire­arms Act the pre­vi­ous winter). And in the wake of it, Pres­id­ent Obama has set to work in­tro­du­cing his own ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions on gun con­trol. His dozens of or­ders in­clude guidelines for pre­par­ing loc­al law en­force­ment and schools for po­ten­tial shoot­ings, as well as rules for re­spond­ing to shoot­ings and keep­ing guns out of the hands of felons. But they don’t ap­proach what might be ac­com­plished by com­pre­hens­ive le­gis­la­tion passed through Con­gress.

Much of the prob­lem, ac­cord­ing to Sarah Brady, has to do with the in­creas­ingly par­tis­an polit­ics of the is­sue. “When we passed the Brady Law, we had sup­port of Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats and Pres­id­ent Re­agan,” she told me on the 30th an­niversary of the Re­agan as­sas­sin­a­tion at­tempt. “But the Re­pub­lic­an Party has be­come a lot more con­ser­vat­ive and more rur­al than it was 20 years ago, 15 years ago, and as a res­ult it’s kind of hard to read how some of these new­er mem­bers are go­ing to be, which is why you need to get to them and get their feel­ings on it and what’s hold­ing them back.”

More than 2.8 mil­lion people have been killed or in­jured with guns in the United States in the 30-plus years since Brady was shot, ac­cord­ing to the Brady Cam­paign’s es­tim­ates.

There’s no es­tim­ate of how many lives the pas­sage of the Brady Bill has saved. But ac­cord­ing to the group’s web­site, more than 2 mil­lion at­tempts by “pro­hib­ited buy­ers” to pur­chase fire­arms have been thwarted. And even if a tiny per­cent­age of those at­tempts would have res­ul­ted in crimes, re­call that the unit we’re meas­ur­ing in is hu­man lives.

What We're Following See More »
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×