CIA Admits to Hacking Senate Computers

In a sharp and sudden reversal, the CIA is acknowledging it improperly tapped into the computers of Senate staffers who were reviewing the intelligence agency’s Bush-era torture practices.

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 26: Committee chairman Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) (C), ranking member Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) (R) and Sen. John Rockefeller (D-WV) (L) listen during a hearing before the Senate (Select) Intelligence Committee September 26,2 103 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. The hearing was focused on the FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) Legislation.
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
July 31, 2014, 7:35 a.m.

The Cent­ral In­tel­li­gence Agency im­prop­erly and cov­ertly hacked in­to com­puters used by Sen­ate staffers to in­vest­ig­ate the spy agency’s Bush-era in­ter­rog­a­tion prac­tices, ac­cord­ing to an in­tern­al in­vest­ig­a­tion.

CIA Dir­ect­or John Bren­nan has de­term­ined that em­ploy­ees “ac­ted in a man­ner in­con­sist­ent with the com­mon un­der­stand­ing” brokered between the CIA and its Sen­ate over­seers, ac­cord­ing to agency spokes­man Dean Boyd.

The stun­ning ad­mis­sion fol­lows a scath­ing, 40-minute speech by Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Chair­wo­man Di­anne Fein­stein on the Sen­ate floor back in March, in which she ac­cused the CIA of secretly ac­cess­ing her pan­el’s com­puters that were used to re­view doc­u­ments re­lated to the gov­ern­ment’s tor­ture, de­ten­tion, and rendi­tion policies de­ployed dur­ing George W. Bush’s pres­id­ency. The power­ful Cali­for­nia Demo­crat la­cer­ated the CIA for at­tempt­ing to im­pede her pan­el’s in­vest­ig­a­tion and charged the agency with pos­sibly vi­ol­at­ing the Con­sti­tu­tion.

At the time, Bren­nan denied Fein­stein’s ac­cus­a­tions, telling NBC News re­port­er An­drea Mitchell, “As far as the al­leg­a­tions of the CIA hack­ing in­to Sen­ate com­puters, noth­ing could be fur­ther from the truth.”¦ That’s bey­ond the scope of reas­on.”

But after be­ing briefed on an in­spect­or gen­er­al’s find­ings, Bren­nan “apo­lo­gized” on Tues­day to both Fein­stein and the pan­el’s top Re­pub­lic­an, Sen. Saxby Cham­b­liss, for the ac­tions of his of­ficers, spokes­man Boyd said.

Bren­nan has sub­mit­ted the in­spect­or gen­er­al’s find­ings to an ac­count­ab­il­ity board led by re­tired Demo­crat­ic Sen. Evan Bayh, ac­cord­ing to Boyd. Bayh, an In­di­ana Demo­crat, once served on the Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee.

In a state­ment, Fein­stein called Bren­nan’s apo­logy and the ac­count­ab­il­ity board sub­mis­sion “pos­it­ive first steps.”

“The in­vest­ig­a­tion con­firmed what I said on the Sen­ate floor in March — CIA per­son­nel in­ap­pro­pri­ately searched Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee com­puters in vi­ol­a­tion of an agree­ment we had reached, and I be­lieve in vi­ol­a­tion of the con­sti­tu­tion­al sep­ar­a­tion of powers,” Fein­stein said. “This [in­spect­or gen­er­al] re­port cor­rects the re­cord and it is my un­der­stand­ing that a de­clas­si­fied re­port will be made avail­able to the pub­lic shortly.”

Fein­stein’s bomb­shell al­leg­a­tions, as well as the CIA’s charge that her staff re­moved clas­si­fied doc­u­ments from a CIA fa­cil­ity in Vir­gin­ia, were both re­ferred to the Justice De­part­ment for fur­ther in­vest­ig­a­tion. But earli­er this month, the de­part­ment said it did not have enough find­ings to launch a crim­in­al probe in­to either mat­ter.

Last week, the chair­wo­man is­sued a state­ment com­mend­ing the Justice De­part­ment for not open­ing an in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to her staff, say­ing it would “al­low the com­mit­tee to fo­cus on the up­com­ing re­lease of its re­port on the CIA de­ten­tion and in­ter­rog­a­tion pro­grams.”

The In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee voted to make a 500-page ex­ec­ut­ive sum­mary of its re­port pub­lic, but that lit­er­at­ure is cur­rently un­der­go­ing an ex­haust­ive de­clas­si­fic­a­tion pro­cess by the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion.

The Sen­ate re­port, parts of which have been leaked already, is ex­pec­ted to con­demn the CIA’s secret “en­hanced in­ter­rog­a­tion” prac­tices un­der the Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion dur­ing the wars in Ir­aq and Afgh­anistan.

Sen. Mark Ud­all, a mem­ber of the In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee, called for Bren­nan’s resig­na­tion Thursday.

“The CIA un­con­sti­tu­tion­ally spied on Con­gress by hack­ing in­to Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee com­puters,” the Col­or­ado Demo­crat said in a state­ment. “These of­fenses, along with oth­er er­rors in judg­ment by some at the CIA, demon­strate a tre­mend­ous fail­ure of lead­er­ship, and there must be con­sequences.”

Demo­crat­ic Sen. Ron  Wyden, who also sits on the In­tel­li­gence pan­el, also blas­ted Bren­nan and asked for a pub­lic apo­logy, “a full ac­count­ing of how this oc­curred, and a com­mit­ment there will be no fur­ther at­tempts to un­der­mine con­gres­sion­al over­sight of CIA activ­it­ies.”

The Amer­ic­an Civil Liber­ties Uni­on dis­missed Bren­nan’s apo­logy as “not enough” and called for the Justice De­part­ment to refer the CIA in­spect­or gen­er­al’s re­port to a fed­er­al pro­sec­utor for a full in­vest­ig­a­tion.

“These latest de­vel­op­ments are only the most re­cent mani­fest­a­tions of a CIA that seems to be­lieve that it is above and bey­ond the law,” Chris­toph­er An­ders, ACLU’s seni­or le­gis­lat­ive coun­sel, said in a state­ment. “An un­con­trolled — and seem­ingly un­con­trol­lable — CIA threatens the very found­a­tions of our Con­sti­tu­tion.”


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.