What It Means to Be a Black Female Candidate

Stacey Abrams is rising fast in Georgia. Some things she learned along the way.

National Journal
Lucia Graves
July 31, 2014, 1 a.m.

Sta­cey Ab­rams is a self-identi­fy­ing in­tro­vert, a former bur­eau­crat, a busi­ness­wo­man, and the au­thor of eight ro­mantic-sus­pense nov­els. She’s also the first Afric­an-Amer­ic­an to lead the Geor­gia state House’s Demo­crat­ic Party, and may have her sights on the gov­ernor’s chair.

It used to be the ac­cep­ted wis­dom that wear­ing mul­tiple hats holds wo­men back (al­beit usu­ally with re­gard to child-rear­ing), but Ab­rams sees hav­ing many fa­cets to her iden­tity as a strength. “I’m a tax at­tor­ney ro­mance nov­el­ist politi­cian … and a seri­al re­luct­ant en­tre­pren­eur,” she said. “That is a real­ity show wait­ing to hap­pen.” (Once, when an ex-boy­friend told her he found the premise of her spy nov­el to be im­plaus­ible, she pun­ished him by cre­at­ing a plot twist that put him in pris­on. “He lan­guishes there to this day,” she quipped.)

Ab­rams has been a named a rising star by EMILY’s List,which works to elect pro-choice Demo­crat­ic wo­men. This spring, she was one of three Demo­crat­ic wo­men honored by the group for her achieve­ments in lead­er­ship, along­side Demo­crat­ic Sens. Di­anne Fein­stein and Bar­bara Box­er of Cali­for­nia.

For now, however, she’s fo­cused on win­ning the House ma­jor­ity for the Demo­crats — and, giv­en Geor­gia’s his­tory as a red state, it’s go­ing to be an up­hill climb. Geor­gia Demo­crats are out­numbered 119 to 60, in con­gres­sion­al dis­tricts ger­ry­mandered to keep Re­pub­lic­ans in power, even as the state has be­come in­creas­ingly demo­graph­ic­ally di­verse and is mov­ing to­ward an ever-blu­er shade of purple.

I in­ter­viewed Ab­rams this spring as part of an­oth­er story on a new EMILY’s List train­ing pro­gram tak­ing place in At­lanta. (When she first ran for of­fice, a friend of hers handed her a big EMILY’s List bind­er of tips; it be­came her bible for her first cam­paign.) We dis­cussed wo­men and race and power, as well as how obstacles, some ex­tern­al, some in­tern­al, can be over­come. What fol­lows is an ed­ited ver­sion of our con­ver­sa­tion.

What do you think stops wo­men from run­ning?

We fear los­ing, and that that some­how sig­nals that we wer­en’t cap­able to be­gin with. It is easi­er to lose in private than it is to lose in pub­lic, and so there’s this fear that if you’re not go­ing to win, then why try? There’s also a tend­ency for wo­men to think that they need to be an ex­pert to win, that you have to know everything about everything — that if I don’t have a Ph.D. in every top­ic, then I’m cer­tainly not qual­i­fied to speak for people. I will tell you that my male col­leagues do not suf­fer from the same de­lu­sion. You don’t need to know everything. You need to know you don’t know everything, and be will­ing to learn about it.

Is run­ning harder for wo­men of col­or?

Wo­men in gen­er­al need to be asked to run, and wo­men of col­or ab­so­lutely have to be asked, be­cause too of­ten what you see around you in terms of lead­er­ship looks noth­ing like you. It’s hard to ima­gine your­self in a place where you don’t have a lode­star.

If you could give ad­vice to a wo­man who’s run­ning for of­fice for the first time, what would it be?

First and fore­most, know what you be­lieve and know why you be­lieve it. Part of it is just sit­ting down with your­self and un­der­stand­ing how deep your con­vic­tions run. Then, if you have the for­tune (or mis­for­tune) of get­ting elec­ted, and com­prom­ise is re­quired, if you have to con­front the real­it­ies of the bill sit­ting next to you, you’ll have a met­ric against which to meas­ure your move­ment. The second thing is to know what oth­ers be­lieve. Too of­ten we enter the polit­ic­al space think­ing it’s about us, and it’s not. It’s about the people who elec­ted you and the people you’re work­ing with or against. If you don’t un­der­stand what they’ve got and what they’re do­ing, they will beat you. But if you can un­der­stand what mo­tiv­ates them, that gives you a tool to use to get what you want done.

How did EMILY’s List help you in your cam­paign, and how do you think the group can help wo­men more gen­er­ally?

It’s about hav­ing someone else val­id­ate your ca­pa­city to lead, and that’s what EMILY’s List did for me. They helped me at the very be­gin­ning without know­ing it; they came in when I’d star­ted run­ning and helped me. But, more re­cently, when I be­came lead­er [of the Geor­gia House Demo­crats], EMILY’s List was there to help me think about my lead­er­ship. What do I need to be do­ing as lead­er to so­lid­i­fy that role, but also, how do I build my ca­pa­city to do even more? Hav­ing wo­men who look like you and sound like you, who think something of you and will tell you — that has a val­id­at­ing ef­fect that can­not be un­der­es­tim­ated.

What did you learn from oth­er po­s­i­tions you’ve held, par­tic­u­larly from your time run­ning your own small busi­ness, spe­cific­ally at NOW Corp., the fin­an­cial ser­vices firm you cofoun­ded?

People like to talk about run­ning gov­ern­ment like a busi­ness, but there are very few people who’ve ac­tu­ally had to make payroll and man­age staff. They don’t really get how that fits to­geth­er and how that fits to­geth­er in the con­text of gov­ern­ment. Gov­ern­ment is a busi­ness, but in a tra­di­tion­al busi­ness, your ob­ject­ive is to please a cer­tain cus­tom­er base that you choose. Gov­ern­ment is the only busi­ness that has to please every single per­son, and none of those people have the ex­act same needs — it’s the most per­verse busi­ness that you could pos­sibly have! So if you’re go­ing to run it like a busi­ness, you have to be will­ing to really frac­ture how you think about your cus­tom­er base. If you couple that with need­ing to un­der­stand how bur­eau­cracy works, and how laws get made, I figured I had a fairly in­ter­est­ing back­ground, and I should try it. And I did. And they let me come. And I’ve been there ever since.

What have you learned from writ­ing fic­tion, and how does it in­form your work as a politi­cian?

I think that cre­at­ive frac­tur­ing of con­ver­sa­tion is ne­ces­sary. You can’t get to new ideas if you only think about things the same way, and I try my best, wheth­er it’s in busi­ness or in polit­ics or in fic­tion or in law, to think about things us­ing both sides of the brain and be­ing as in­tern­ally dis­rupt­ive about my own ideas as I can be. When you do that, I think you find where your flaws are, where your mis­takes are made, but it also lets you get past the heav­i­ness of the con­ver­sa­tion. These are big things we’re deal­ing with — abor­tion and poverty and crim­in­al justice. If you let your­self get bur­ied be­neath the heft of what you’re try­ing to pur­sue, you’ll nev­er get it done.

Why are these dif­fer­ent iden­tit­ies im­port­ant to you? Why don’t you de­vote your­self to one thing?

If I lose my lead­er­ship, if I lose an elec­tion, if I get fired from a job, I’ve got mul­tiple backup plans. But more than that, who I am is not tied to any of those things, so I’m not go­ing to make — or do my best not to make — dumb choices try­ing to hold onto one of those things. I’m not go­ing to sac­ri­fice my eth­ics to stay the lead­er, be­cause if I lose this for some reas­on, there’s something else I can do. And if our busi­ness fails, I’m not go­ing to make dumb choices about cook­ing the books, be­cause I know I can start an­oth­er busi­ness. All of these things work to­geth­er to give me op­tions, and when you have op­tions, you can make smarter choices.

What We're Following See More »
AT LEAST NOT YET
Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Preet Bharara Learned at the Foot of Chuck Schumer
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."

Source:
DRUG OFFENDERS
Obama Commutes the Sentences of 58 Prisoners
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.

STAFF PICKS
Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"

Source:
‘NO MORAL OR ETHICAL GROUNDING’
Sen. Murphy: Trump Shouldn’t Get Classified Briefigs
3 hours ago
THE LATEST
×