Opinion

To Strengthen Retirement Security, Close the Pay Gap

The gender pay gap that shapes many women’s working lives also takes a huge bite out of their Social Security benefits.

Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., has served as the U.S. Representative for Connecticut's 3rd District since 1991.
National Journal
Rep. Rosa L. Delauro
Add to Briefcase
Rep. Rosa L. DeLauro
Aug. 5, 2014, 1 a.m.

For mil­lions of wo­men in Amer­ica, So­cial Se­cur­ity amounts to the dif­fer­ence between health and hun­ger. It provides a ma­jor­ity of the in­come that six in 10 wo­men age 65 or older rely upon to meet their ba­sic needs. For three in eight older wo­men liv­ing alone, it provides vir­tu­ally all — 90 per­cent or more — of their total in­come. But the gender pay gap that shapes many wo­men’s work­ing lives takes a huge bite out of their So­cial Se­cur­ity be­ne­fits. To strengthen So­cial Se­cur­ity’s fin­ances and wo­men’s re­tire­ment se­cur­ity, we need to close the wage gap for good.

Right now, wo­men make less than men in nearly every oc­cu­pa­tion for which wage data are tracked. One year out of col­lege, wo­men are paid 18 per­cent less than their male coun­ter­parts. Ten years out of col­lege, the wage gap leaves wo­men earn­ing 31 per­cent less.

Over a 35-year ca­reer, these earn­ings dis­crep­an­cies swell to ex­ceed­ingly large sums. Across the en­tire work­force, the av­er­age ca­reer-long pay gap is $434,000. For col­lege-edu­cated wo­men, the pay de­fi­cit av­er­ages $654,000.

These dis­par­it­ies have a pro­found im­pact on wo­men’s eco­nom­ic se­cur­ity, both dur­ing their work­ing years and in re­tire­ment. In 2012, wo­men over 65 re­ceived an av­er­age So­cial Se­cur­ity be­ne­fit of $12,520, com­pared with $16,396 for men. Wo­men of col­or are doubly dis­ad­vant­aged due to the com­bined ef­fects of the gender pay gap and ra­cial or eth­nic pay dis­par­it­ies. Afric­an-Amer­ic­an wo­men re­ceive an av­er­age So­cial Se­cur­ity be­ne­fit of $11,974, and His­pan­ic wo­men only $10,500. Is it any won­der that twice as many wo­men as men over the age of 65 live in poverty?

Along with help­ing to keep a lar­ger share of the coun­try’s fu­ture seni­or cit­izens out of poverty, clos­ing the gender pay gap would also strengthen So­cial Se­cur­ity’s fin­ances. Ac­cord­ing to a study by the In­sti­tute for Wo­men’s Policy Re­search, wo­men would have earned an ad­di­tion­al $448 bil­lion in 2012 if the gender pay gap were closed. Most of this in­come would be sub­ject to So­cial Se­cur­ity payroll con­tri­bu­tions — po­ten­tially in­creas­ing the pro­gram’s rev­en­ue by tens of bil­lions of dol­lars each year, and re­du­cing its long-term short­fall by roughly one-third.

I have in­tro­duced the Paycheck Fair­ness Act in every Con­gress since 1997. By bring­ing pay-dis­crim­in­a­tion law in­to line with oth­er civil rights law and giv­ing teeth to the Equal Pay Act, I be­lieve that it would help to en­sure a simple prin­ciple: same job, same pay. It has twice passed the House of Rep­res­ent­at­ives with bi­par­tis­an sup­port, and come only two votes shy of gain­ing Sen­ate ap­prov­al. I see the Paycheck Fair­ness Act as a cru­cial part of the com­pre­hens­ive eco­nom­ic agenda for wo­men and fam­il­ies that my Demo­crat­ic col­leagues and I have put for­ward this year. And, over the long term, it would strengthen the So­cial Se­cur­ity pro­gram on which so many Amer­ic­ans de­pend.

So­cial Se­cur­ity is a bed­rock in­sti­tu­tion of Amer­ic­an life, and the ul­ti­mate le­gis­lat­ive ex­pres­sion of our shared na­tion­al val­ues. As soon as it be­came law, the poverty rate among seni­ors began to drop. That demon­strated the pro­found pos­it­ive im­pact that good policy can have on fam­il­ies’ eco­nom­ic se­cur­ity. But to make sure it is provid­ing a se­cure and dig­ni­fied re­tire­ment to all Amer­ica’s work­ers, we need to make sure wo­men are be­ing paid what they are due.

Passing the Paycheck Fair­ness Act in­to law will do ex­actly that.

Rep. Rosa De­Lauro, D-Conn., has rep­res­en­ted Con­necti­c­ut’s 3rd Con­gres­sion­al Dis­trict since 1991. Her dis­trict in­cludes New Haven and most of its sub­urbs.

HAVE AN OPIN­ION ON POLICY AND CHAN­GING DEMO­GRAPH­ICS? The Next Amer­ica wel­comes op-ed pieces that ex­plore the polit­ic­al, eco­nom­ic, and so­cial im­pacts of the pro­found ra­cial and cul­tur­al changes fa­cing our na­tion, par­tic­u­larly rel­ev­ant to edu­ca­tion, eco­nomy, the work­force, and health. In­ter­ested in sub­mit­ting a piece? Email Jan­ell Ross at jross@na­tion­al­journ­al.com with a brief pitch. Please fol­low us onTwit­ter andFace­book.

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
14 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
17 hours ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
17 hours ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
1 days ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login