Grover Norquist Explains Why He’s Going to Burning Man

“Burning Man is a refutation of the argument that the state has a place in nature.”

A bicycle rider makes it through a dense sand storm at Black Rock City's playa during the Burning Man Festival in Nevada on September 1, 2000.
National Journal
Emma Roller
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Emma Roller
July 29, 2014, 8:25 a.m.

Grover Nor­quist — the pres­id­ent of Amer­ic­ans for Tax Re­form, which was foun­ded in 1985 with a mis­sion to fight in­come-tax in­creases — has wanted to go to Burn­ing Man since 2012.

Burn­ing Man is an an­nu­al fest­iv­al of de­bauch­ery that takes place in the middle of the Nevada desert. At­tendees, called “burn­ers,” of­ten dress up in crazy cos­tumes, waltz around na­ked, take co­pi­ous amounts of il­li­cit sub­stances, and gen­er­ally do whatever they want.

So, how did a con­ser­vat­ive act­iv­ist like Nor­quist get in­ter­ested in Burn­ing Man? He tells the story like this: A couple of years ago, Larry Har­vey — the founder of Burn­ing Man — was in Wash­ing­ton to ne­go­ti­ate with the Na­tion­al Park Ser­vice about land use for the fest­iv­al, which takes place on fed­er­al land. Har­vey later stopped by Amer­ic­ans for Tax Re­form’s weekly Wed­nes­day meet­ing, and end­ing up go­ing to din­ner with Nor­quist and his wife, Samah Alrayyes Nor­quist. “You’ve got to come out!” Har­vey told them.

Un­for­tu­nately, the stars did not align for Nor­quist that year — the Re­pub­lic­an Na­tion­al Con­ven­tion was sched­uled for the same week­end as Burn­ing Man. In Ju­ly 2012, Nor­quist tweeted, “Which idi­ot put the GOP con­ven­tion the same time as ‘Burn­ing Man’ in Nevada? Is there time to change this?”

“It wasn’t doable with sched­ules and so on be­cause the Re­pub­lic­ans put their con­ven­tion right on top of Burn­ing Man, silly people,” Nor­quist told Na­tion­al Journ­al on Tues­day. “That’s why they prob­ably lost the elec­tion.”

Two years later, Nor­quist is fi­nally cross­ing that item off his buck­et list.

In a month, he and his wife will set out for Black Rock, Nev. — a bar­ren, 300,000-acre desert that trans­forms in­to a he­don­ic met­ro­pol­is for one week every Au­gust. (For more back­ground, read Wells Tower’s ex­cel­lent story in GQ about his trip to Burn­ing Man).

After Nor­quist an­nounced Monday his plan to at­tend the fest­iv­al, many re­acted with dis­be­lief, or simply de­clared, “Burn­ing Man is dead.” But Nor­quist in­sists that the drug-filled uto­pia in the desert shares some com­mon val­ues with his own group, Amer­ic­ans for Tax Re­form.

“Burn­ing Man was foun­ded in ‘86, the same year as the Pledge, and the first Burn­ing Man had 20 people at it, and our first Cen­ter-Right Meet­ing — the Wed­nes­day Meet­ing — also had 20 people. So I think there’s a real kin­ship there,” Nor­quist says. “These are very sim­il­ar op­er­a­tions, ex­cept we tend to wear more clothes per­haps at the Wed­nes­day Meet­ings.”

Burn­ing Man re­lies on a “giv­ing eco­nomy” where at­tendees are en­cour­aged to give goods and ser­vices free of charge — a sys­tem that Har­vey has called “old-fash­ioned cap­it­al­ism.” And this is hardly the first in­stance of cap­it­al­ists like Nor­quist be­ing drawn to Burn­ing Man. In re­cent years, Sil­ic­on Val­ley’s elite, in­clud­ing Google CEO Eric Schmidt, have flocked to the event.

Nor­quist says the fest­iv­al is a good ex­ample of the the­ory of spon­tan­eous or­der. The the­ory, which was pro­moted by Aus­tri­an eco­nom­ists like Friedrich Hayek, holds that a nat­ur­al struc­ture will emerge out of a seem­ingly chaot­ic en­vir­on­ment without need for out­side in­ter­ven­tion.

“There’s no gov­ern­ment that or­gan­izes this,” Nor­quist said. “That’s what hap­pens when nobody tells you what to do. You just fig­ure it out. So Burn­ing Man is a re­fut­a­tion of the ar­gu­ment that the state has a place in nature.”

“This is a fun, ex­cit­ing, cheer­ful col­lec­tion of people be­ing free of state con­trol and do­ing stuff they want to do,” he con­tin­ued. “If some­body wants to sit in a corner and read Hayek, I think that that’s al­lowed. If people want to run around with not as much clothes as they nor­mally do, I think that’s al­lowed as well.”

Once he gets to Black Rock, he doesn’t have an ob­ject­ive. “I’m go­ing to chat with people who have done it be­fore and who are there, and go with the flow,” he said.

In the past, Nor­quist has sup­por­ted fed­er­al tax breaks for marijuana grow­ers. So, will he be par­tak­ing of the buf­fet of drugs that Burn­ing Man has to of­fer?

“I think lots of things should be leg­al that I don’t do,” he tersely replied.

Nor­quist said he needs to fig­ure out what items to bring to con­trib­ute to the “giv­ing eco­nomy,” and joked that he would bring signed cop­ies of his new book. But he ad­mit­ted that in the playa, a bottle of wa­ter is more valu­able. That’s the beauty of the mar­ket at work.

What We're Following See More »
ONLY 14 NO VOTES
House Approves Opioid Package
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The House on Friday overwhelmingly passed sweeping bipartisan opioid legislation, concluding the chamber’s two-week voteathon on dozens of bills to address the drug abuse epidemic. The measure combines more than 50 bills approved individually by the House focusing on expanding access to treatment, encouraging the development of alternative pain treatments and curbing the flow of illicit drugs into the U.S. It was passed 396-14, with 13 Republicans and one Democrat voting against the package."

Source:
NEVERMIND THE TWEETS
Trump Tells Congress North Korea Remains a Threat
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

In a letter to Congress on Friday, President Trump wrote that he's continuing the national emergency status with respect to North Korea, citing the country's “provocative, destabilizing, and repressive actions," which "continue to constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat” to the United States. In a series of tweets following his meeting with Kim Jong-un, Trump said Americans could sleep well at night because North Korea no longer poses a nuclear threat.

Source:
ZERO-TOLERANCE FALLOUT CONTINUES
Navy Document Outlines Plans For Detention Camps
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The U.S. Navy is preparing plans to construct sprawling detention centers for tens of thousands of immigrants on remote bases in California, Alabama and Arizona, escalating the military’s task in implementing President Donald Trump’s 'zero tolerance' policy for people caught crossing the Southern border." The document outlines plans for "temporary and austere" internment camps for 25,000 migrants "at abandoned airfields just outside the Florida panhandle," and in Alabama, for 47,000 people near San Francisco, and "as many as 47,000 people at Camp Pendleton" in California. The document estimates that operating a camp to detain 25,000 people for six months would cost approximately $233 million.

Source:
LASERS USED IN DJIBOUTI TOO
U.S. Military Aircraft Targeted By Lasers
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Lasers have targeted pilots of American military aircraft operating over the western Pacific Ocean more than 20 times in recent months," said U.S. officials. The lasers appeared to be coming from Chinese fishing boats in the South China Sea, said the officials, which is the setting of a "long-running dispute between China and Japan over the control of nearby islands ... The incidents likely will come up as part of a broader discussion of issues when Defense Secretary Jim Mattis visits Beijing next week and meets Chinese President Xi Jinping."

Source:
EMPHASIZES SECURITY AND JOBS
Trump Overturns Obama Orders on Oceans
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump has unveiled a new policy that depicts the world’s oceans as a resource ripe for expanded business opportunities, reversing the Obama administration's emphasis on protecting 'vulnerable' marine environments." Rather than emphasizing environmental protection, as Obama's policy did, "Trump’s directive speaks mostly to the oceans as a resource for promoting national security" and creating jobs.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login